Reda.Saiko

I have the same issue with the B550 Taichi and the temp plugin. I haven't been able to find a solution, I am now considering swapping my PC and NAS motherboards to test if I get more luck with Asus.

Hello, Thank you for your awesome plugins. Everything was working as intended in my system until I upgraded hadrware. Now the System Temp and S3 Sleep have somme issues. OLD HARD: R3 Pro 2200GE + Asus TUF B450M Pro S + Corsair TX750M NEW HARD: R7 Pro 4750G + Asrock B550 Taichi + Corsair RM650i Now, the System Temp plugin detect eberything at first, but when I click on save all the sensors disappear. But the big issue for me is the S3 sleep plugins, the system doesn't wake up correctly, some cores are stuck at 100% usage and I can't access the array even if the GUI works. Any idea of what I can do to solve these issues?

Hi, PM sent.

I will try this and update. For now I have been able to get 2.5gbps download by deactivating bridging, but my VMs are left without LAN (using an USB Wifi for now).

Sorry, I am really lost here. I think I have missed something. With these settings, I get 1 gbps download and 2.5 gbps upload. And with these settings, I get 2.5 gbpsboth ways. Thank you for helping me here it's really appreciated.

Thank you a lot. So with this setting no need ti disable the bridging? For now I am testing with bridging to No and my speed is 2.5 2-ways, but like you I have some dockers and vms.

Wow, Intel 2.5GbE NIC is faulty (every model, even the V3 with the pretended hardware fix...isn't fixed) and Realtek one have this issue. So I just have to forget about any motherboard native 2.5 NIC and get myself a PCIe card like the Intel X540? In the other topic the solution is: But I don't relaly dunerstand the subnet part, I will try now with the bridging disabled to see it it works.

I have the same issue, if possible, can you please explain in details how you did solve it (I don't really understand the subnet part). This would help a lot of people like me who avoid Intel 2.5GbE nic known for its issues just to get this.

Done, these are the results. PC SIDE SERVER SIDE

I have been trying to do this but I really don't know how to, any useful link that shows the process? This will help a lot.

Hello there, I have been doing some Lan test this week and found something weird. After using some dockers in Unraid to test Lan speed (SpeedTest-By-OpenSpeedTest and another one), I found that my "Download" speed is capped to 1Gbps when my "Upload" speed is around 2.5 Gbps. This is my actual setup: - Unraid server running on a B550 mobo with the Realtek 2.5Gb Lan running at 2.5 full duplex. - Main desktop with Marvell AQC111C (5GbE running at 2.5 full duplex). - Secondary desktop with the infamous Intel 1225-v running at 2.5 full duplex. - Everything connected to a 2.5 GbE switch. - Switch connected to the router for internet. - Everything is showing 2.5 Gbps software side. I don't understand, since I am on a 2.GbE setup, I think my speed should be 2.5GbE both ways, I don't know if it's related to hardware or software. What do you think? Any solution? Is it normal?! Thank you for reading.

Hi there, I have been struggling with a weird issue in my server for the last week, I think it started after updating from 6.9.3 to 6.10.3, but I am not really sure (I don't check the logs usually). The log is filling with errors from one of my computers in the network, and only this one (I have 2 desktops and 1 laptop). After a few days, I decided to reset everything and clean install windows in the computer causing the error and, after I finished configuring everything, installing my softs...etc I got the errors in the log again (Attached image 1). So I have been checking the log for the whole day (what a nice Sunday ^^) and, at least, I have figured that this time, unlike before reinstalling windows, the error is only triggered by Bitdefender Total Security scanning hkey_users s-1-5-21-xxxxxx (Attached image 2). Again, this is only happening with the same computer, the weird thing is that my 2 desktops have 100% similar settings/software installed, the difference being AMD vs intel (intel being the one filling the log). Running a scan with Bitdefender in the AMD computer doesn't trigger the log error. I have added a new drive and moved a few shares to it this week, so I don't know if I can roll back safely to 6.9.3 to check if the issue will be gone. I can also restore an image of my windows installation created just after the clean install, but for now I am not doing either until I got other people advices. What do you think? Any idea of what's causing those errors? And why on 1 computer only? Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Hi, Sorry for the delayed answer, I was a little too busy. I used another combo and ECC works. More details here: https://pcpartpicker.com/b/FqTCmG#cx4086185 Hope it helps.

Hi there, Planning this build for an Unraid NAS + Windows 10 VM. I have searched for weeks about the topic but still have some unanswered questions, hope I will get more chance here. The NAS usage will be normal file server (planning to reach 60 Tb not counting parity) , and the Win10 VM will be used for Digital art software (Clip Studio Paint) with a Wacom Cintiq Pro 16 (this device support touch functions). I want to use ECC memory, and I am concerned about USB and GPU passthrough, latest Nvidia drivers and stuff. The parts: CPU: Ryzen 5 3600/3600x - Ryzen 7 2700/2700x. Used 2nd gen Ryzen is the same price as new 3rd gen, which one is better? Especially concerned about motherboard choice and ECC compatibility. MB: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI). ECC support is listed with Ryzen 3000. Nothing about the 2000 series. Does anyone know if this board REALLY support ECC functions? I mean not just running the rams but running them with their error detecting/correcting function. Any other tested board? ECC RAM: KSM26ED8/16ME. Only ECC memory present on QVL of Asus and Asrock motherboards that list support of ECC. HBA: LSI 6Gbps SAS HBA Fujitsu D2607-A21 FW:P20 9211-8i IT Mode. Cheapest 8i HBA card I have been able to find. Should I be wary of something? Cables: SAS to SATA. Regular 1 SAS to 4 SATAs cables. What do you think? Any feedback will be appreciated. Thanks for reading.