Drowsy
-
Posts
17 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by Drowsy
-
-
binhex-delugevpn stopped working out of the blue so i installed binhex-deluge and copied the data over with binhex-krusader and it was working again.
binhex-deluge now stopped working too (webgui doesn't load) . If i backup my current deluge data, wipe the dockers and re-install them how do i prevent it from happening again? I'm still on 6.8.3
-
2 weeks ago i updated the container and my torrents where gone so i reverted to 14.2.5.99202004250119-7015-2c65b79ubuntu18.04.1
which fixed everything.
Is it safe to update? Which instructions should i follow to correctly update? -
Solved! Thanks a million Joe, it's working like a charm again
-
Hello everyone,
I am a happy unraid user since early this year, but today i ran into a slight problem.
Today i switched from a DSL line to a fiber line, but unraid had a static local network IP and i forgot to change it to a dynamic one before the internet got changed, so i can't connect to the webgui. I hooked up a monitor and keyboard to the server and booted it up but i lack the linux knowledge to invoke the proper commands so i can change the static IP to a dynamic IP and re-integrate it into the local network. My question is, how do i change this without changing the rest of the configuration or damaging the array.
I'm not sure if additional information is required, but i am using a pre-build tower (MD-1510/LI) ordered from limetech.
Daan
-
Personally, I have an unresolved split level issue. I've posted about it here a few times. No-one here had any useful responses which means, to me, mo-one here has any idea why the problem occured. I then emailed Limetech with a detailed explanation of the problem and I got no response. This is a customer with a pro license who sent an email for support so there is no question if this was a support issue or not. So, from my side of the fence, support from Limetech isn't good at all. Even a quick response to say "I will look into it so look for the fix in future release" would be better than nothing.
I commend the users here who are attempting to create documentation and support beyond responding to questions here. Personally, my view is that Limetech is a company that is making money from it's users. In that sense, the company should have the proper manuals and support in place to support the product it sells. I just don't have much motivation to spend time adding support for a product I don't have a financial stake in. I'll check in here when I have some spare time I'll check out the "user" forum.
With the fairly recent advances in HTPC's and disk sizes, I really don't expect unRAID to be the only game doing what it does for too much longer. Flexraid Live is in active development (with a developer doing it for free and still providing much more active forum support) and the Drobo basically does what unRAID does on a file storage level so there are other similar solutions appearing and I expect there to be even more interest (maybe Microsoft since I they must get earfuls about how WHS is great except for file duplication) in the future to give drive failure protection on large file servers without relying on a true RAID array.
I very much agree with that.
In a free market there is one thing that strongly influences the way companies treat their customers: competition. Right now there is no other competing management utility for the modified MD driver. I can understand why people refrain from creating such utility out of loyalty for Limetech. That's commendable! But all loyalty has some reasonable limits. Like, give the guy three years to make whatever money can be made undisturbed, and after that -- it's fair game. It's already been over four years. It's high time somebody untertakes a project for another management utility on top of the modified MD driver. I would invest in such project without hesitation. Create competition and see how most of the grievances expressed in this thread will magically disappear.
Those are nice assumptions, but they are just that. In this free market you speak of people will do anything to gain, anything. Software, patent and license wise it ain't that simple though. I like to think Limetech management unplugged the phone and are working there creative magic somewhere on a dusty attic creating something wonderful and worth the wait. It is this assumption of my own that made me invest here and now and what i find appealing all together.
Like others have mentioned, what u seek is available --sign a support contract.
-
this is looking awesome!
-
It's responses like this that make this such an amazing community. Honestly, I have found such few forums where people will take the time to write up such a detailed response that is coherent and easy to follow.
There are a few Hero members on this board that deserve a huge Thank You from novice members such as myself and from Lime-Technology. If it were not for these members, I most likely would not have purchased an Unraid license. I understand Tom is hard at work in the background improving things and does not have time to respond to all posts, but when he does it is very much appreciated. In the end though, it is the active and knowledgeable forum members that are driving sales for this product. Please, keep up the great work!
I couldn't agree more, that was also the reason for me to buy this product. This community is unique.
Thank you all!
-
I had a similar question and Tom mentioned by e-mail they are planning another RB-1200 build soon
-
cheers m8 - got confused there for a sec
-
Another newbie question;
How come there is a reference to the pre-clear script - shouldnt Unraid peform a pre-clear by default?
I thought the script was purely there to safe time so that the array doesnt need to be down.
[Support] Flight777 - "Just Works" Container Repository
in Docker Containers
Posted · Edited by Drowsy
I cannot get it to work sadly and i am not sure where the problem is.
I have a p1 cable hooked directly into unraid. According to the unraid logs its recognised.
Landis Gyr E350 Screen;
It does capture data on /dev/ttyUSB0
postgres logs;
Seems ok
But the dsmr log is full of errors:
I've read the topic, i tried to delete the serial reference in the docker settings but that was already removed when i installed the image.
Can anyone see what the problem is? Feels like dsmr docker can't really access /dev/ttyUSB0 even though there is a path.