Sonova_BeachBum

Hi, I have never experienced this issue before and hope to find some help. I run an HP DL 380 Gen9 with a P420ar raid card with PCI expander. There are currently 19 existing SAS drives that appear to be functioning as they should. I have added two drives to the system and neither of them are reporting to Unassigned Devices. I can hear both drives spin up and the activity lights indicate they are detected. They also appear as present and healthy in the storage manifest in HP's ILO. This system has been online for well over a year and I have successfully added new disks as recently as January. The only variable I can think of at the moment is the recent upgrade to 7.2.4 from 7.2.3 last week. This is an excerpt from the log that shows that unraid does recognize the event when I inserted them into the drive bays and my two attempts at refreshing UD. Apr 7 01:11:18 VISION kernel: hpsa 0000:03:00.0: Acknowledging event: 0x80000000 (HP SSD Smart Path configuration change) Apr 7 01:11:34 VISION kernel: hpsa 0000:03:00.0: Acknowledging event: 0x80000002 (HP SSD Smart Path configuration change) Apr 7 01:11:34 VISION kernel: hpsa 0000:03:00.0: scsi 1:0:21:0: masked Direct-Access HP EG1200FDJYT PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0 Apr 7 01:11:49 VISION kernel: hpsa 0000:03:00.0: Acknowledging event: 0x80000002 (HP SSD Smart Path configuration change) Apr 7 01:11:49 VISION kernel: hpsa 0000:03:00.0: scsi 1:0:22:0: masked Direct-Access HP EG1200FDJYT PHYS DRV SSDSmartPathCap- En- Exp=0 Apr 7 01:12:21 VISION unassigned.devices: Refreshed Disks and Configuration. Apr 7 02:45:16 VISION unassigned.devices: Refreshed Disks and Configuration. Has anyone else ran into something like this? Please help me figure this out. Thank you -Greg

Greetings, quick question about IPMI Tools. Is there support for ILO? I searched "HP" and "ILO" in the section and both returned zero hits. I apologize if you have covered this previously. I appreciate the intent of why this tool was created. ILO is a powerful little system. I would love to have granular fan control by the same means which would let me channel the data it generates into a log aggregator or dashboard. Especially any method that allows me to escape HP's garden. Thanks.

Hi Guys, I came across a broken link in the HELP function in the GUI and just wanted to send a note in case it has gone unnoticed. I did not think it warranted a bug report so I am entering it here. The broken link I found is in Main/Settings/Devices in the expanded help text of the GUI for a btfs cache pool. Specifically the link for BALANCE MANPAGE has moved on their site. The information is now located at https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-balance.html. I included a screenshot of the location I am referring to. I've been using Unraid for about two and a half years and I am very pleased with it. Any problem I have had have been of my own making. Cheers! (Greg from the Space Coast of Florida)

root@MEDIASYNC:~# zpool import pool: cache id: 1735300694171723445 state: ONLINE action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier. config: cache ONLINE sdh1 ONLINE pool: disk5 id: 4102616346420463541 state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: disk5 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas md5p1 UNAVAIL invalid label pool: disk5 id: 14652328161973356707 state: ONLINE action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier. config: disk5 ONLINE md4p1 ONLINE pool: disk1 id: 3172973332698465298 state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: disk1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas md1p1 UNAVAIL invalid label Yeah, ultimately I think it's time to completely retire the server. I got three years of life out it for about $250 total. It wasn't the fastest of it's generationbut it had a lot of heavy lifting capability. Gen 9 is really the plae to start with retired HP Enterprise gear. IPMI without using Java, EFII, lower overall TDP. I can view som e of the drives in MC and will try to save what I can. One last question please, Formatting is never an advised recovery option, which wa stated by a wise man in an earlier thread I saw. In this case with few easy options available, do you have an idea if it might work to restore the partition table while leaving the data intact since it's ZFS to ZFS formatting? Just an "off hte record" guestimate? Thank you for your help with me today. I appreciate your time and effort. -Cheers!

root@MEDIASYNC:~# zpool import pool: cache id: 1735300694171723445 state: ONLINE action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier. config: cache ONLINE sdh1 ONLINE pool: disk5 id: 4102616346420463541 state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: disk5 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas md5p1 UNAVAIL invalid label pool: disk5 id: 14652328161973356707 state: ONLINE action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier. config: disk5 ONLINE md4p1 ONLINE pool: disk1 id: 3172973332698465298 state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: disk1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas md1p1 UNAVAIL invalid label

I thought this might be significant. It's the first status that pops up when launching gdisk on one of the volumes. Is this normal? ***Partition table scan: MBR: protective BSD: not present APM: not present GPT: present Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.***

blkid /dev/sda1: LABEL_FATBOOT="UNRAID" LABEL="UNRAID" UUID="272B-4CE1" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" /dev/loop1: TYPE="squashfs" /dev/sdf1: LABEL="disk5" UUID="4102616346420463541" UUID_SUB="11759275404662384013" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="a5baf8a1-01" /dev/sdd1: LABEL="disk1" UUID="3172973332698465298" UUID_SUB="12413462718045097097" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="a5ba988d-01" /dev/sdb: TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/md5p1: LABEL="disk5" UUID="4102616346420463541" UUID_SUB="11759275404662384013" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/md1p1: LABEL="disk1" UUID="3172973332698465298" UUID_SUB="12413462718045097097" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/sdg: TYPE="zfs_member" PTUUID="16b2fbf0-f299-4bac-bc0c-51aba9ee5d7d" PTTYPE="gpt" /dev/md4p1: LABEL="disk5" UUID="14652328161973356707" UUID_SUB="13778812108514822478" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/loop0: TYPE="squashfs" /dev/sde: TYPE="zfs_member" PTUUID="a073e81f-77af-4d65-9cc8-b50153f0f20a" PTTYPE="gpt" /dev/sdc: TYPE="zfs_member" PTUUID="b8860f57-0511-4e4f-a915-d178b783a598" PTTYPE="gpt" /dev/md3p1: LABEL="disk5" UUID="11974352758200759327" UUID_SUB="8033002180000953218" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/sdh1: LABEL="cache" UUID="1735300694171723445" UUID_SUB="4228319297741014893" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="a5c0740a-01" /dev/md6p1: LABEL="disk4" UUID="528979897614096157" UUID_SUB="10279172848350455314" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member"

mediasync-diagnostics-20240710-1013.zip

Yes, They are all 1.2TB. They are all set to "MBR 4Kb aligned". Perhaps it is not a a noted bug. I have been up all night on this and came across several mentions of an issue involving disks formatted ZFS over a former XFS type. Diagnostics coming shortly once system boots. I should also note that one issue from the 30,000 foot view is the RAID controller. It's a legacy HP with no HBA option. The disks are all set to RAID 0 and it will not pass through driver serial numbers. It's a hassle but i've been successfully working around it for a few years.

Hi folks, I can really use some help getting this problem resolved. I am on 6.12.1 with 1 parity, 1 cache, and 5 data disks in a zfs hybrid array. I was actually in the process of backing up my cache disk to swap it with a larger one when we had a power outage. When the system was powered up and the array started again three of the disks in it were showing "Unmountable, Unsupported". I believe that the problem is a result of a previously reported bug. When using fdisk to view the drive info I noticed that all three of the problematic drives show the "Disklabel type" as "dos" and the "Type" as Linux". The other drives show as GPT and seem to operate as they should. Using gdisk on one of the affected drives yields this result: ***Partition table scan: MBR: MBR only BSD: not present APM: not present GPT: not present *************************************************************** Found invalid GPT and valid MBR; converting MBR to GPT format in memory. THIS OPERATION IS POTENTIALLY DESTRUCTIVE! Exit by typing 'q' if you don't want to convert your MBR partitions to GPT format! *************************************************************** Warning! Secondary partition table overlaps the last partition by 33 blocks! You will need to delete this partition or resize it in another utility."** So this leads me to my post here today. I believe the solution is to repair the partition table on the affected disks and import the zpools to restore everything. Testdisk has saved my butt on many occasions in the past but I am not comfortable using gdisk. Can I simply use the Format function in the GUI without destroying the data on the disks? Is gdisk a better choice and if so, what are the steps in repairing the part table? Is there something better than either of those previous two options? I would really appreciate some help and guidance with this issue. I need help. To quote Maude Flanders "Won't somebody please think about the children?" -Cheers and Thanks Greg

Hello, This is a fresh install and the system was working fine several days ago. I got home last night, several days after last successful session. It is version 6.12and I have included the diagnostic zip file. Please note that there are several other items that appear to be minor conflicts with the HPE DL360 Gen7 that this is running on. i've got one DHCP link to the WAN and one static 10GB link using DAC to my desktop. the 10Gb is the 10.10 network. I really appreciate any help on this. i'be neem running another instance of Unraid on my Gen9 HP box for the past two years and it's running great ,knock on wood> Thanks -Greg Sonova_Beach_bum mediasync-diagnostics-20230625-1508.zip