whitephoenix117
-
Posts
22 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by whitephoenix117
-
-
So I have an interesting diagnostic update.
Home assistant is still collecting data from the APC UPS daemon, but the card on Unraid is broken. Meaning, Unaird is still communicating with the UPS.
-
Restarting restored the proper functionality 🤷♂️
But after a day or so it stopped again, was able to repeat this behavior 2x
-
I also lost mine in the dashboard recently, but it's showing as a USB device.
-
I'm not sure if this is the correct place for a feature request. I would like to use this plugin to only backup my flash drive. It would be nice to have a global option to skip/disable docker & appdata.
Current workaround
- point app-data to an empty directory
- turn each docker to "no"
My only concern with this is that every time I install a new docker I need to remember to disable its backup.
-
Due to the lack of encryption I would prefer not to use Unraid connect. I had tried using the appdata backup plugin but I couldn't find an option to leave all my docker containers running. I don't want to restart them every day, week, etc and I'm already backup up my appdata separately.
-
I'm trying to make the flash drive readable by a backup app that not running as root. What am I missing?
root@Tower:~# ls -la /boot/bzroot -rw------- 1 root root 30157108 Dec 1 09:49 /boot/bzroot root@Tower:~# chmod o+r /boot/bzroot root@Tower:~# ls -la /boot/bzroot -rw------- 1 root root 30157108 Dec 1 09:49 /boot/bzroot root@Tower:~#
-
On 7/9/2023 at 5:55 AM, JorgeB said:
post the output of:
losetupalso having the same problem
NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE DIO LOG-SEC /dev/loop1 0 0 1 1 /boot/bzfirmware 0 512 /dev/loop2 0 0 1 0 /mnt/cache/system/docker/docker.img 0 512 /dev/loop0 0 0 1 1 /boot/bzmodules 0 512 -
6 hours ago, JorgeB said:
That looks about right with default writing mode, you can try turbo write, should be faster at the expense of all drives spinning up for writes.
Thanks!
Sure enough enabling reconstruct write did improve the speed. The parity delay mentioned is not unique to ZFS but it I have never noticed it before so then:
- When I looked at write speeds the past all the disks happened to already be spun up
- The effect is somehow worse with ZFS?
-
I added a new ZFS drive to my pool and started to move data over, its quite slow. Drive should be between 150-250 MB/s but its been hovering at +/- 50. There seems to be something bottlenecking a 1 or 2 single cores, screenshot below shows just 1 but sometimes its 2.
-
1 hour ago, primeval_god said:
cant it be configured to backup to multiple locations to handle both your onsite and offsite?
It can, but using Syncthing saves me from wiregaurd, DDNS, port forwarding, etc on the remote client. It's also very simple to add multiple remote clients. I think the compromise here is to enable the trash can feature for Syncthing, I really only want to manage versioning in 1 place and, from what I can tell Duplicacy is far superior to syncthing in this regard. Enabling the "trash" will at least protect me from accidental deletion.
Its not in my previous post but I also have nextcloud running inside the share, so I will have many layers of versioning
- Nextcloud version/ trash can
- Duplicacy replicates of above
- Syncthing "trash can"
-
RAID is not a backup. Sync is not a backup. But what if I use both of them together
Question is. Does this approach qualify as a 3-2-1 backup?
Proposed Solution
-
Unraid Array, single parity
-
Share 1 (Critical Primary)
- Disk1
- Disk2
- etc
-
Share 2 (Critical Backup)
- Disk3
- Disk4
- etc
-
Share 3 (Non-Critical)
- All disks
-
Share 1 (Critical Primary)
Implementation
- All data, applications, etc would write to Share 1.
- Duplicacy would then be utilized to creation versioned backups of the data between Primary --> Backup.
- Syncthing would be used to mirror Share 2 to an offsite location.
- Shares 1 & 2 would be protected by Dynamix File Integrity plug-in
I think this would give me 3-2-1
-
3 copies
- Share 1, Share 2, offsite
-
2 physical disks
- disk 1/2 + disk 3/4
-
1 geo-redundant
- Offsite
-
Unraid Array, single parity
-
Just came across this in my search for a similar solution. While I haven't tried it, I think running 2 syncthing instances both pointing to different shares would work for both of our use cases.
@avp2306 FYI Unraid array drives are readable outside the array
Goals
- Maintain Unraid array flexibility compared /w ZFS (add/ remove drives, different sizes, etc)
- Protect against drive loss
- Protect against bit-rot
Proposed Solution
Shares 1 & 2 should be protected by Dynamix File Integrity plug-in
-
Array
-
Share 1 (Critical Primary)
- Disk1
- Disk2
- etc
-
Share 2 (Critical Backup)
- Disk3
- Disk4
- etc
-
Share 3 (Non-Critical)
- All disks
-
Share 1 (Critical Primary)
All data, applications, etc would write to Share 1. Syncthing would then be utilized to mirror data between Primary --> Backup. This would also allow for file versioning utilizing sync things own service
This would likely be acceptable for my use case as my "critical" data is maybe 10% of my total storage, so disks 3 + 4 in the backup would also be utilized to store other data in the array.
Would love some feedback from the Unraid Experts!
-
On 2/11/2023 at 6:30 PM, Pulteney said:
When you manually start the array you get a popup window where you can select resend or cancel. If I choose resend I get this degraded state, and only a reboot fixes it.
Pressing cancel instead of resend seems to work just fine.
This is my experience in Firefox atleast.
This!
Can confirm I had the same issue, also in firefox. If you click cancel everything is good. Resend causes the bug
Unraid 6.11.5
-
I bought 5 refurbished ST16000NM001G drives, I'm per-clearing them all before adopting. One of them is finishing the final post-zero read extremely slowly. Wondering if I should trust this drive at all.
Suspect Drive
Successful Drive
-
I have the same issue, but a different use case.
Personally I will probably use a user script on array start; but I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it. It's just what I'm most familiar with.
-
57 minutes ago, Geck0 said:
@whitephoenix117
Nicely done.
If you ever figure out how to stop PS5 controllers from disconnecting from bluetooth when playing Steam games, I'd love to know.
Use an xbox controller 🤣
-
2 hours ago, ghost82 said:
the checkmarks are greyed out because probably he has the unraid usb plugged in a usb controller in iommu group 19 (I bet it's the sandisk ultra usb 3.0).
Enable acs override, reboot and post the whole diagnostics not only xml.
Thanks! I hadn't thought about this. SanDisk was my boot drive.
I had ACS override turned on for my GPU, I moved it to "both" this was able to split it up, and bind it to VFIO
I updated my VM settings
Now My Xbox Controller is Working
(its the little things)
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, ghost82 said:
Why you set the wifi on slot 1? put it on bus 5, slot 0, function 0.
I tried, I get an error message
QuoteXML error: Invalid PCI address 0000:05:00.0. slot must be >= 1
7 hours ago, ghost82 said:As far as bluetooth, it's a usb device,
Thanks on 2nd review of the intel doc's you're right. It's USB
I passed through just the device
<hostdev mode='subsystem' type='usb' managed='no'> <source> <vendor id='0x8087'/> <product id='0x0aa7'/> </source> <address type='usb' bus='0' port='2'/> </hostdev>
I can't figure out how to passthrough the entire controller as a PCI device...
it appears, but it still has an error
IOMMU's
-
I'm struggling a bit with the same problem; also have a Gigabyte Extreme x570 WIiFi. hoping you might be able to help. I can get wifi, but not bluetooth...
Unraid 6.10.2
IOMMU
IOMMU group 22:[1103:2680] 04:00.0 SCSI storage controller: HighPoint Technologies, Inc. Device 2680 (rev 01)
IOMMU group 23:[8086:24fb] 05:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168NGW [Stone Peak] (rev 10)
IOMMU group 24:[8086:1539] 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I211 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03)
XML
<hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'>
<driver name='vfio'/>
<source>
<address domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
</source>
<alias name='hostdev2'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x01' function='0x0'/>
</hostdev>Windows Devices
WiFi is showing, no bluetooth
[Plugin] Appdata.Backup
in Plugin Support
Posted
I'm have all Docker's disabled on purpose. Any chance of disabling this error, or at least making it configurable? It ends up emailing me every time it runs.