emotion_chip

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

emotion_chip's Achievements

Noob

Noob (1/14)

3

Reputation

  1. Ok, great that worked for me... I updated to the new version of the plug-in Upgraded to 6.12.6 from 6.12.4 Restarted like normal and everything came up as expected. Thanks for the quick fix!
  2. Sorry, next time I try to troubleshoot I'll download the diagnostics info... I thought it would be helpful to show that other people were having the same issue as cardo
  3. I am also having the same issue described... I have the 8156 Realtek USB LAN Adapter. It worked fine in 6.12.4 and doesn't work in 6.12.5 or 6.12.6. I am also seeing eth122 thing showing up and I think it was listed as "shutdown" or something like that... I assumed that was because I had my built-in network cable as part of bond0 and it couldn't fine eth0 (usb) so eth1 (PCI) took over. I tired deleting my network config and that didn't make any difference. I didn't try removing the plug-in and reinstalling, I can try that next time I get a chance. I have reverted back to 6.12.4 and everything works fine.
  4. Ok, thanks... looks like there's already a post in there about someone having the same issue
  5. I just got the USB LAN Adapter working in 6.12.4 a couple of weeks ago and now when I upgrade to 6.12.6 it stops working (device does not exist on reboot). I have the RTL8152 Drivers plug-in installed. Reverted back and it works fine. Anyone else having issues? (I saw the note about system hang with using jumbo frames, didn't see that setting, but haven't had any systems hangs)
  6. Every time a new unraid version comes out I try to see if all the issues with macvlan are sorted out and it sounds like it's still not? I can't even tell to be honest. So I'm still on version 6.11.5 It's not even clear to me what I can or cannot do on ipvlan that I can do on macvlan, I setup most of my Dockers years ago so I have no idea why I did something a certain way... I currently am using macvlan and I have have dockers setup as br0, bridge, or host. It sounds like bridges are what are causing trouble? Are br0 and bridge both bridges? The dockers I setup using br0 are so they can have a separate IP from my unraid, is that no longer an option? What's the easiest/safest way to update the dockers so I can upgrade to a newer version.
  7. My smb-fruit.conf is as follows # global parameters are defined in /etc/samba/smb.conf # current per-share Unraid OS defaults vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr #fruit:resource = file #fruit:metadata = netatalk #fruit:locking = none #fruit:encoding = private fruit:encoding = native #fruit:veto_appledouble = yes #fruit:posix_rename = yes #readdir_attr:aapl_rsize = yes #readdir_attr:aapl_finder_info = yes #readdir_attr:aapl_max_access = yes #fruit:wipe_intentionally_left_blank_rfork = no #fruit:delete_empty_adfiles = no #fruit:zero_file_id = no # these are added automatically if TimeMachine enabled for a share: #fruit:time machine
  8. Yea, I've tried tweaking the SMB fruit settings ad nauseam, it's frustrating to see yet another release version and yet another thread that just basically says here are some settings you can randomly try, good luck!
  9. I can’t figure out where my bottleneck/issues are with accessing shares on my Mac. My Unraid specs are as follows: Intel® Xeon® CPU E3-1225 v3 @ 3.20GHz LENOVO ThinkServer TS140 (Moved motherboard to a different case) LSI 6Gbps SAS HBA LSI 9211-8i IBM ServeRAID 16-Port 6Gbps SAS-2 SATA Expansion Adapter Plugable 2.5G USB C and USB to Ethernet Adapter Unraid 6.11.1 (updated drivers to work with 2.5G USB) Using the “SpeedTest-By-OpenSpeedTest” my network speed comes in around 2300 Mbps or around 287.5 MBps so that’s my theoretical max speed I’m using “Blackmagicdesign Disk Speed Test” to test local and share speeds. Running my SSD drive locally I can get 465 MBps / 375 MBps read/write I’m only trying to troubleshoot caching speeds, I understand reading/writing directly to the array is a different story. Unless I’m mistaken, writing to a share that is using the cache should not have any overhead, correct? I made a “cache only” share so only the cache speed is tested. I go back and forth between using NFS shares and SMB shares. Sometimes SMB is faster but it’s VERY inconsistent and overall is less stable (Finder will crash/hang) and file browsing is VERY slow. I’ve had a test speed one time of 252/197.4 read/write but right now I’m only getting 190/152 and earlier I was only getting like 50/30 and sometimes ever slower. Ultimately it doesn’t matter what the speed is on SMB shares… they are effectively unusable because of the slow browsing speeds and constantly crashing the Finder. With NFS on the other hand I can browse folders and files pretty much instantly. The speeds are very consistent when connecting to a share. I almost always get 175/90 read/write. What is very odd is if I take the same SSD and remove it from the cache and just share it as an unassigned drive I get less consistent speeds.I recently got 191/176 but right now I’m getting 171/167. So I can get higher than the 90 writes over NFS but no idea why that’s only when it’s not part of the array.