copper

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

copper's Achievements

Noob

Noob (1/14)

2

Reputation

  1. Hi! Did you manage to control it somehow? I have similar issue
  2. hello, I am leaving this as a comment on how I set up collabora on nextclout with reverse proxy with valid ssl locally. configuration for reverse proxy in NGIX proxy manager: and My main issue was that somehow Collabora and nextcloud containers were not able to resolve DNS names. Simply Collabora was not reachable from nextcloud container by domain name. I really didnt know why (I have a custom unraid DNS setup that is able to resolve duckdns.org addresses) That why I came up with another solution: In advance docker container configuration (in container edit) you need to add the Extra Parameter: for collabora: and for nextcloud so both nextcloud and collabora can resolve those domains into IP address and SSL certs will be added by NGIX. With those change docker will update /etc/hosts with proper IP resolving names without even DNS setting up. Hope this helps some of you
  3. Hi I have done some testing in this topic recently. Please take a look maybe it will help you all
  4. Hello, I feel like the topic was discussed quite a bit in other forum threads, but still, in my opinion it was not a clearly answered to some of mine questions. Thats why I decide to investigate on my own. I do not agree that when Bitrot is detected on array we are screwed up our Bitrot affected data without any backup. This is how I tested it: - I add rather small pendrive (32gb) formatted in ZFS (uncompressed and not encrypted) to array (I suppose that brtfs will work as well): - I created text file : root@home:/mnt/disk2# cat 123.txt abcdefgh_123_elo - I intentionally broke one bit in this file. How? You cannot simply modify an file since it will end up modified and not corrupted. I used here operation on raw disk data. I created a bunch of raw sectors out of /dev/sdX using linux dd command - in my case - sda is my pendrive: dd if=/dev/sda of=/mnt/user/test/sector bs=512 count=2000000 2000000 * 512 gives us 1 GB of raw disk data stored as file named sector . For the next sectors I used -skip=already readed sectors option. and I used Hex editor to locate my file and its content stored as raw data (I used Vim here but other might work as well). at around 9GB I spot: I changed manually only one bit (from 63 to 62) in those found sequence so in ASCII hex representation it was abbdefgh_123_elo. Then I used scrub. root@home:~# zpool status -v ... pool: disk2 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scan: scrub repaired 0B in 00:00:01 with 1 errors on Tue Mar 12 14:49:47 2024 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 md2p1 ONLINE 0 0 2 errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files: /mnt/disk2/123.txt So basically I achieved the detected corruption of 123.txt file. just for confirmation: - I ran Unraid parity check with UNCHECKED Write corrections to parity which gives me 1 error during check. - I stopped Array, removed disk from array, start array, and emulated 123.txt file worked well: - I added once again the same pendrive to the array to rebuild it and everything worked as suspected. So conclusion? - Run ZFS Scrub (or Btrfs equivalent) first to detect any possible errors - if errors is detect you can check Unraid parity check but WITHOUT Write corrections ! ! ! - if you enable it you update the parity drive with corrupted data - rebuild the corrupted drive to possibly a new one Hope this helps some of you. Regards
  5. If You want to wipe out all configs for docker, after removing docker container, just delete appdata/<name of your container> folder and reinstall container. Are you setting it with SSL certificate or not? out of configuration it look like you are setting it without. I am not sure why you might have such issue. Anyway many peoples are using nextcloud without SSL and just by typing IP address and port. Maybe it will suits you?
  6. First point is about fact that you do not have ssl certificate on site. Take a look maybe here 2nd point is to add redis database. Take a look about 3rd point I spotted it as well yesterday. But I think it’s nothing to be worry about.
  7. Hi 👋 I am using Nextcloud-ffmpeg and I do not spot any errors/warnings that in my opinion I should be worry about. I followed instruction from container support but I think you are aware about it. So what are those error you mentioned?
  8. If someone faces a similar issue I suggest moving the main Array device to XFS and changing "Docker vDisk location:" in Docker settings to docker-xfs.img as well. At least on my setup, it fixed the issue with disks that were unable to spin down due to constant activity. although I am not sure if that was the root cause of my issue- I changed my setup quite a bit recently.
  9. Hi, Did You manage to resolve this? I think that I am facing a similar issue - itop reports: I was looking at posts on the topic: which was similar but not the same. What is bothering me a bit is constant disc activity due to this message. Is there a way to fix it or docker to stop reporting this?