Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Unraid

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

mythic

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Hi! I tried to follow space invaders Route Containers Through WireGuard – Advanced Docker Networking guide, but could not reach any docker containers on my lan after setting them up using the bult in vpn tunnel. Problem is when setting up vpn tunneled access for docker post up post down settings are created in the vpn conf file to exempt the lan ip range but not the tailscale one. Now that tailscale is built in they should probably also be except by default or you will have a loot of users wondering why this is not working as expected. You don't have to use a exit node for the dockers to be unreachable on lan if you have tailscale running, if not setting up the exceptions you just have to have the use tailscale subnets option ticked for them to be unreachable. When adding these lines to the conf file everything works as expected and should probobly be set by default or set after checking what ip range tailscale is using: PostUp=ip -4 route add 100.64.0.0/10 dev tailscale1 table 200 || true PostDown=ip -4 route del 100.64.0.0/10 dev tailscale1 table 200 || true
  2. I have the same issue but my time is fine and i have been trying different NTP and this still happens for me on Unraid 7 rc1.
  3. I noticed the same, went back to 6.12.13 it was better but still every few seconds everything starts to lagg and core 0 is swamped then back to normal for a few seconds and back again. Ran htop and it was zfs cache master plugin. Removed the plugin and now all is fine again. Will hold out on both the plugin and the 6.12.14 update for a while. Maybe ill try again in unraid 7.
  4. Coming from Synology and miss this setting. I think it make a hard link if you copy a file to the same drive. So both speed and space saving. First thought ZFS deduplication was the same thing but it seems like its not, and that ZFS deduplication is really resource heavy in contrast.
  5. This was something i miss coming from a Synology NAS, they have a trash for every share that is system wide so not only SMB like the Recycle Bin plugin. Really miss that so i hope this is still under consideration.
  6. I believe the most significant challenge Unraid faces in attracting more customers is not a lack of marketing but the complexity of its setup. I ventured into it a few months ago, and just the initial step of obtaining a supported USB key required substantial research. Then, when you acquire a modern, reputable brand key, it's often too large for the setup to proceed, necessitating the use of external applications and manual installation to make it work. Expecting people to use 16GB sticks today is akin to asking them to revert to using floppy disks. Beyond that, there's inadequate settings information in the os; the wikis are somewhat outdated. The main resource becomes scouring through old YouTube videos for guidance. The absence of setup wizards and the high risk of errors, along with limitations like no WiFi connectivity from the host, compound the issue. Although I appreciate the operating system, I cannot recommend it to less tech-savvy friends. This, in my opinion, is Unraid's most substantial barrier to increasing revenue, not marketing. Marketing will naturally follow if the software becomes easy to set up and stable. Challenge a typical Windows user to install it with a RAID, a VM, and a Docker container without making mistakes or needing to search the internet for help. Achieving that level of user-friendliness and revenue will follow.
  7. I have yet to try Unraid so im not entirely sure what im saying has bearing, building my server right now. But as i have read mover can be made to move all files and files of a certain age when a fill rate of the drive is reached. My whish would extend i bit more than just choosing Array A move to B if % fill. But also Move A to B and B to C if % fill until % fill is reached starting with last used files. If this was possible i could have Fast nvme raidz array A slower sata ssd raidz array B and even slower hdd raidz array C. And the files would drip down based on use, and not move back and forth like a read/write cashe, killing the ssds. So if like array is 90% filled then empty to 80% fill. And so forth. That would be perfect and i would not have to manually monitor what needs to be placed where.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.