Jump to content

Encino Stan

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    62

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Encino Stan

    [SOLD][US-TX] iStar BPN-DE350SS Trayless 3x5.25" to 5x3.5" SAS SATA 6 Gbps HDD Hot-swap Rack, $55

    in Buy, Sell, Trade

    Posted · Edited by Encino Stan
    sold

    SOLD

     

    Pulled from my Unraid server.

     

    iStar BPN-DE350SS, Black

    https://www.istarusa.com/en/istarusa/products.php?model=BPN-DE350SS

     

    The fan has been replaced with a quieter Noctua fan. The 3-pin connector is on a 20" cable.

     

    Five (5) SATA cables are included.

     

    Trays are unlocked and lockable, but I don't have the key.

     

    $55 Shipped CONUS US.

     

     

    PXL_20240205_200406170~2.jpg

    PXL_20240205_200442266~3.jpg

    PXL_20240205_201006800.MP.jpg

    [SOLD][US-TX] LSI 9200-8i (9211-8I) RAID Controller + 2 SFF-8087 to SATA Forward Breakout Cables, $18 shipped CONUS

    in Buy, Sell, Trade

    Posted · Edited by Encino Stan
    sold

    • LSI 6Gbps SAS HBA LSI 9200-8i (9211-8I) 
      • MPN: SAS9200-8i, H3-25113-03A
      • Flashed to IT-mode
    • 2 internal Mini SAS to SATA Cable 3 Feet (SFF-8087 to SATA Forward Breakout) cables. 
      • each cable handles 4 sata drives

     

    Parting out my Unraid server. This PCI Express controller handles 8 SATA III drives.

     

    $37 shipped conus US. 

    Price drop.  

    $18 shipped to CONUS.

    SOLD

     

    [Support] Djoss - MakeMKV

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    On 8/11/2018 at 7:37 PM, Djoss said:

    @Encino Stan, do you have this error for every disc?  Are you using the default container settings?

    I am using the default settings. I do get that error if I get the chance to click the "Make MKV" button. Half the time I get errors (same error I think, will have to check) during the open disc operation. There is about a 50/50 chance I have of reading a disc successfully, and the same disc may work one time and fail another.  One disc opened and had only one title that was 8 minutes. It skipped the < 2 min titles as expected, but I didn't see the 1.5 hr title.

     

    I am wondering if I have an issue with my drive, ASUS BW-16D1X-U.  I will install MakeMKV on my Win10 box and try there.

     

    What drives are people having good luck with (preferably external).

    [Support] Djoss - MakeMKV

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    On 8/11/2018 at 10:38 AM, saarg said:

     

    This usually happens when you have used a port that is already in use. 

     

    OK. Seems that I get that error if I restart the container to soon after stopping. Maybe I don't give it time to release the ports. If I wait before starting (after a stop), then I don't get that error.

    [Support] Djoss - MakeMKV

    in Docker Containers

    Posted · Edited by Encino Stan

    3 hours ago, Djoss said:

    Also, is your cache pool full?

    Cache has 298 GB free. I do see the SSD drive lights flashing when running the program.

    I was going to say that Execution Error occurs as soon as restarting container, but just now started fine.

    I am going to try another DVD and report what it does...

     

    .. OK. Read the DVD and selected just main title and only english audio and subtitles. 2018-08-10_1.png 

    2018-08-10_1.thumb.png.16451aaa09f5fae5c5e660954134c5ca.png

     

    .. click the Make MKV button and get error.  2018-08-10_2.png 

     

    2018-08-10_2.thumb.png.c6c8b387b517079ed7685fc9816c83f6.png

    [Support] Djoss - MakeMKV

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    Newbie with makemkv. First time trying to rip Blu-Ray discs. I installed this docker and am getting errors.

    Quote

    Your temporary key has expired and was removed. Please restart the application.

     

    ... followed by ...
     

    Quote

    The application version is too old. Please downlaod the latest version at http://www.makevkv.com/ or enter registration key to continue uing the current version.

     

    Is this a known issue that will resolve itself when the beta key gets updated or do I have something wrong?

    Would registering a key solve this? (And I don't see where to purchase a key.)

     

    [Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)

    in Docker Containers

    Posted · Edited by Encino Stan

    3 hours ago, nka said:

    I've search a bit but there's 81 pages... so I might have missed that.

     

    Is there a way to have multiple domain ? Like domain1.com and domain2.com with some subdomain ?

     

    I can configure it manually (already done in fact), but I can I'm not sure about the CertBot to make a renew the cert ?

     

    Thanks !

    On 3/25/2018 at 1:42 AM, geekypenguin said:

     

    Advanced view > Extra parameters then the full command is -e EXTRA_DOMAINS=<domain2>,<domain3> etc

     

    Thanks!

     

    Documented here: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-letsencrypt#parameters

    • Like 1

    12 Thousand invalid login attempts and counting

    in Security

    Posted

    On 2/12/2018 at 10:18 AM, sol said:

    Two days ago I upgraded to 6.4.1. During the process of this I made some other changes.

    I generated an SSL cert, which seems to work fine. 
    I also moved Sonarr from a plugin to a docker, which also seems to work fine. 

     

    However, since upgrading, or maybe not related at all, I have somehow exposed my server to the internet resulting in the Fix Common Problems Plugin reporting that I have over 12k invalid login attempts over the past two days.

     

     

    I wonder if there was something unique about 6.4.1. All my login attempts started within a couple of days after upgrading to 6.4.1 and the log showed they attacked every few days until I upgraded to 6.5.0. There have been no log entries of attempted login since upgrading to 6.5.  Either a coincidence or there was some vulnerability in 6.4.1.

    [Support] Linuxserver.io - MariaDB

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    MariaDB docker says there is an update. I have updated, but it still shows update available. 

      

    Pulling image: linuxserver/mariadb:latest
IMAGE ID [latest]: Pulling from linuxserver/mariadb. 
IMAGE ID [9be5c6869873]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 41 MB. Download complete. Extracting. 
IMAGE ID [b954adc8b2ea]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 817 B. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [7417f525481d]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [4e3280041f03]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [e26640012edf]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 163 B. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [43e4d6ff98e1]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [3dd04afd22dd]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 14 MB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [1ed2672d3116]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 450 B. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [a1d0ddccc53e]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 68 MB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. 
IMAGE ID [242f2575c5e6]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 4 KB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. 
TOTAL DATA PULLED: 123 MB

Stopping container: mariadb
Successfully stopped container 'mariadb'

Removing container: mariadb
Successfully removed container 'mariadb'

Command:
root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker run -d --name='mariadb' --net='bridge' -e TZ="America/Chicago" -e HOST_OS="unRAID" -e 'PUID'='99' -e 'PGID'='100' -e 'MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD'='x' -p '3306:3306/tcp' -v '/mnt/cache/appdata/mariadb':'/config':'rw' 'linuxserver/mariadb'
9cde2120a29827974f3a064185370dc9954d1e779306c3b3d759a9372e55da75

The command finished successfully!

     

    12 Thousand invalid login attempts and counting

    in Security

    Posted

    18 minutes ago, Frank1940 said:

     

    You need to post up your diagnostics file (   Tools   >>>   Diagnostics   )  with some of these login attempts in it.

    I will next time I see them. Panicked yesterday and shut tower off. Turned back on today, and only see logs for today. I guess system gets reset on boot? 

    [Plugin] CA Fix Common Problems

    in Plugin Support

    Posted · Edited by Encino Stan

    On 2/20/2018 at 2:47 PM, hmgnsd said:

    Hello, getting a strange message that I don't recall seeing when running extended tests:

     

    Warning: parse_ini_file(/boot/config/share.cfg): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/fix.common.problems/include/tests.php on line 1706

     

    I've uninstalled and reinstalled the plugin and still get the error?

    I am getting the same when running regular scan ...
    Warning: parse_ini_file(/boot/config/share.cfg): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/fix.common.problems/include/tests.php on line 1706

     

    line 1706 of test.php is "    $iniFile = parse_ini_file("/boot/config/share.cfg",true);"

     

    Confirmed that /boot/config/share.cfg doesn't exist.

    12 Thousand invalid login attempts and counting

    in Security

    Posted

    Last month (Feb) I upgraded to 6.4.1. During the process of this I made some other changes, and generated an SSL cert, which seems to work fine. 

    Haven't logged onto my system since, yesterday logged on and Fix Common Problems warned me of many logon attempts.

     

    GRC Shields Up shows that all ports are stealth. I don't have any ports forwarded in my router.

     

    [Support] GitLab-CE

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    On 7/14/2016 at 3:08 AM, thomast_88 said:

    ...this docker contains all necessary dependencies already (Redis, PostgreSQL, Nginx etc.)...

    Newbie question. If I already have Nginx and a database running in separate docker containers, does that change this install?

    For example, would I need PostgreSQL running in this container if I already have MariaDB running in it's own container?

    Auto-Creating the Shares?: appdata,domains,isos,system

    in General Support

    Posted

    5 hours ago, trurl said:

    There were some auto-created on new installs. If you are running an older install that you have upgraded in the normal way then they might not be, I'm not sure. I don't have some of those, but I don't have VMs turned on.

     

    Have you actually enabled docker? If so, was there some problem? You should be able to tell it where to put docker.img, and create an appdata share yourself. That is what I did a long time ago before there were any "automatic, system" shares.

     

    I created appdata share manually, set as cache preferred. Docker is enabled. I assume all is well. Is there a simple docker container to try out first?

    Auto-Creating the Shares?: appdata,domains,isos,system

    in General Support

    Posted 

    Are there standard shares that are supposed to be auto-created? Where would I see them?

I see in the release notes that for Version 6.2.0-rc2 there was a note that "correct logic auto-creating the shares: appdata,domains,isos,system". That leads me to think that some shares are supposed to be created automatically. The only shares I see are the user shares that I created.

    I was trying to enable docker, but I don't have a share for appdata. Is that share supposed to exist or do I manually create it? What other shares am I missing?

    Simple Static IP Question

    in General Support

    Posted

    On 3/15/2017 at 5:41 PM, Squid said:

    Personally, I'm a fan however setting static IP's within the router and keeping all the computers set to DHCP

     

    On 3/15/2017 at 5:42 PM, SnickySnacks said:

    The one problem with setting the IP static locally (without using the router) is that the router may try to assign the address via DHCP to another computer and you end up with two devices with the same IP. I believe this might happen if non-static computer A came up, got the IP address, then static computer B came up and tried to use the same address.

     

    Option 1: Set the static IP to an address outside the pool of addresses the router uses

    Option 2: Set the static IP on the router

     

    Personally, I tend to prefer option 2, since it lets me keep track of all my static IP devices from one location (the router) rather than needing to keep track of what has been assigned where, externally.

     

    Of course, if your router has a pool that starts at like 192.168.1.1, setting unraid to .250 or something is usually pretty safe as it would be rare for enough clients to be on the network to request that high.

     

    I like having each device use DHCP and assign static addresses in the router. That way if the router has to change, or if the device is moved to another environment, then everything still works.

     

    Additionally...

    I assign the static addresses with the 4th subnet starting with '1'. (192.168.1.1xx), 

    but I have my router assign dhcp from a pool from 201-249 (192.168.1.2xx)

     

    That way I can tell from a glance if I have missed assigning a device or there is a 'guest' device on my lan.

×
×
  • Create New...