Jump to content

segator

Members
  • Content Count

    112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About segator

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. the release comes with docker or just a binary. Wireguards runs on the kernel, the docker or my app only send the commands to the kernel. so the performance is native as unraid plugin. - Looks like node addition is unrestricted. to be able to add a node you need the clusterID, but the security of course should be improved. - How trustful is this free service kvdb.io? you are right, maybe we should upload data encripted then problem solved. - How is key management handled between peers? public keys are uploaded to the configuration manager and shared with rest of nodes of the cluster - Is it possible to update/revoke keys? nope - Any control on what nodes can access, a single device or a complete LAN? both are supported Hey @bonienl I don't expect this app as a replacement of what already exists on unraid, what we have now in unraid is what wireguard offers and thats great. What my app does is simplify big node cluster deployment. try to configure 50 nodes peer to peer between them and the half have dynamic public IP that changes 1 time a week. Is not something people in unraid will need, only some nerds like me. I didn't built that even in high security in mind, I only wanted something to simplify the deployment and allow dynamic public IP provided by internet companies. If I have time some day I will add to UPNP and UPD hole punching support so people won't need to open ports on their routers.
  2. I'm not a fan of GUI's I undertand for lot of people can not be interesting, i'm not trying to say that this implementation is better than the current one, is a diferent alternative my app provides: - Automatic configuration on all the nodes of the cluster (new/update/remove nodes) - Support for dynamic IP: it update the endpoint of the node that the public IP changed an the rest of the nodes.
  3. Hey @bonienl you are completly right but first I want to ensure what I wants works then I will try to help admin's to add those modules. What I'm trying to achieve is install kubernetes on unraid, but I have some problems with ipset and some networking modules.
  4. Have a look on the repo https://github.com/segator/wireguard-dynamic there are instructions and explanation, if you have questions after read that let me know
  5. Guys have a look on my app, I published a year ago This app automatically link your nodes, and in case you have dynamic public IP it detects changes too. https://github.com/segator/wireguard-dynamic Now it works fine on unraid
  6. Hello guys someone can give me instructions to build the kernel and package for unraid 6.8? I need to add some modules to kernel Thanks!
  7. Wireguard++ I created a simplified app to create wireguard mesh networks with docker, maybe can be used as application for unraid, but first we need the kernel module! https://github.com/segator/wireguard-dynamic I use wireguard for network overlay for my multisite kubernetes cluster. Now I would like to be able to add baremetal unraid as a worker
  8. It works awesome!!! on my asrock ep2c602, but it seems the fan control don't see one of the FAN's CPU_FAN1_2, but it's weird because in the sensors page I see it and his values.
  9. Hi to everyone, sorry to take this topic abandoned, I decided 1 year ago to don't use anymore unraid(No snapshot support, Switched to glusterFS) and I Forgot to answer replies. Well I see pretty interest in this docker, I don't know the situation of Xpenology right now, it does support latest Synology versions? Now i'm going 2 weeks to japan, when I return I will try to take time to update and simplify the docker image.
  10. Hi guys, I create a first version of Xpenology on a Docker(Running inside a VM) Install Xpenology it's a mess on, so I simplfied the process you only need to execute one docker command and you have your Xpenology instance working on any Host machine (with KVM support) https://github.com/segator/xpenology-docker I Created this docker because I wanted to have power/beauty Synology UI but I wanted Hard drive managment of unraid. So you can access your files using NFS/glusterFS from xpenologyDocker to your unraid Host and get all the awesome features of DSM. I didn't push the final image to the docker hub because I don't know if could be ilegal to push and image with xpenology on it. So you need to build it before, but it's very simple and easy.
  11. Hi guys, I finally create a first version of Xpenology on a Docker https://github.com/segator/xpenology-docker Check it all, I have DSM & hyperbackup with unraid server working
  12. guys I find out something you will like DSM 6.1.3 + ETH Virtio + Hyperbackup working(yes the data is in the unraid host mounting with glusterFS) in the Proxmox thread on xpenology forum someone compiled a version of jun loader with virtio driver works perfectly. And Playing with petaSpace I find out that internally use glusterFS and works also with hyperbackup so I tried to create a glusterFS docker over unraid server and mount it in the xpenology VM and hyperbackup works I thinking to create a docker with the DSM Ready to use image for all of you. I think lot of people could be interested.
  13. I am looking for a solution I can have the benefits of unraid + snapshots - JBOD - Parity Drive - Only spin up disks where files been used are located - See all drives as a single volume - If 1 or more disk fail only lose data of these disks. - SSD Cache Write Disk -Also would be interesting have SSD Cache Read Disk (avoid spin up drives on more readed data) - Snapshots For the moment I only be able to have all this features using glusterFS + LVM, but I would like to have the simplicity of unraid OS(Pendrive OS based), UI and notifications of disk failures and SMART
  14. OS: Unraid 6.2 Pro CPU: Dual Xeon E5-2670 - SR0KX stepping Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602 RAM: 32GB ECC buffered 1333 mhz quad rank Case: nanoxia deep silence 5 Drive Capacity: 16x3.5 (5 hot plug 11 intern) (Motherboard only have 14 sata, I will need a HBA in the future), 1 have 5.25 bay empty so I can add a enclosure 6x2.5 if i want Power Supply: EVGA SuperNova 850G2 Fans: 1 Rear, 2 cpu fan, 3 HDD fan Parity Drive: 8TB Seagate Archive Data Drives: 8TB seagate archive 2x2TB Seagate 4TB WD red 6TB WD Red 2x3TB WD Green Cache Drive: 1TB Seagate (normal drive) Array Capacity: 28TB Services: Plex,Deluge,TVHeadend,Jenkins(automated video encoding to microHD after download),Rancher(Docker host clustering UI),(Test Purpose)Windows 2012 Server, Centos, RancherOS, Windows 7(Rendering machine),crashplan,duplicati Used for media center and cloud storage server and lab-server, I usually work with simulating clusters to test different cases so I need to create multiple VM. And My GF need a lot of power to do 3d render. I know the case it's not the best but I can't handle waste 300$ for a case... and I had some problems find cheap cases with EEB form factor this case can handle with the 5x3 enclosure 16 HDD, for me it's enough. very very silent!!! it's difficult to know the server is turned on by ear. very good performance, first days I was trying to have 2 VM gaming and work perfect! no errors about power consumption I'm more or less over 100W in idle and 370W at full
  15. Hi sorry it's 850W the psu about maybe i'm wrong but i thought your power supply is limited to the sai output, it isn't? my sig is fine is exactly the machine were i having this trouble. I though the problem was the power supply but I changed the sata cable of the 3 drive that I get disconnections and changed to an other sata controller, ran parity check and no errors and no disconnections. It's weird to think about this 3 cables have problems, and I have more HDD pluged to this "problematic sata controller" and are working fine. So i'm not sure what is the problem