rdubs

Members
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rdubs

  1. Yah, I couldn't find any unraid dockers that are compiled with mono or any other way for me to run an aspx page though. I suppose I could make my own image, but that would be a lot of reading and exploring, I have no idea how lol.
  2. Ah, bummer! Ok, well I put a windows vm machine with IIS to host for now. How can I forward my ssl protocol to this webserver instead? My current nginx config looks like this server { listen 80; server_name _; return 301 https://$host$request_uri; } # main server block server { listen 443 ssl default_server; root /config/www; index index.html index.htm index.php; server_name _; ssl_certificate /config/keys/letsencrypt/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /config/keys/letsencrypt/privkey.pem; ssl_dhparam /config/nginx/dhparams.pem; etc I would want to bypass the nginx serving the pages now, but maintain the SSL encrpytion to the new vm host though Thanks!
  3. Hi, how can I run an aspx website with this docker? The fastcgi protocol is already enabled for php, so it should just be some config file changes right? I'm not sure if the fast cgi mono server is included in this docker? Thanks for any help!
  4. Ah ok thanks. Is the php.ini not exposed in this container for some reason? I also need the mysqli extension enabled if possible.
  5. Hi, I'm wondering how I can enable Bzip2 with this container? A lot of php tools require this functionality. (I'm not sure where the php.ini is stored for the docker environment?)Thanks!
  6. --Edit: I was able to add skip-grant-tables to the cnf file in the mysql folder. This allowed me to properly use the bash to reset the password. Thanks!
  7. Hi, What would be the procedure for resetting the root password on this docker? I installed it a while ago and no longer remember what it was set to. The information I found online suggests to run the mysql server with the parameters, " --skip-grant-tables " in order to allow for a new root password to be established; however, I don't know how to do this inside a docker environment. Thanks!
  8. Hi, after some searching around the forums I figured out how to run vmware inside a windows 10 vm/kvm. However, it doesn't seem to work with 64 bit architecture. It says the host doesn't support vt-x. I'm guessing that's because the host is already passing it through to kvm, but is there any work around to this? Or is nested limited to 32 bit vms?
  9. Ah thanks for the info. I'll need to research a bit more on how to effectively handle them in a windows environment then
  10. For the sake of learning, could anyone share with me why that above string was causing each file to be independently wrapped?
  11. Ah! Well that's easy and anti climatic lol. Thanks for the info
  12. As a preface, I'm basically brand new to linux and learning as I go. Mostly googling my way around at the moment. I'm currently in a situation where I want to be able to compress a directory on the unraid server and then import it to my windows machine and decompress it(using 7zip for now). I'm using the following command: tar cv -C /mnt/user/Backup/Test . | xz -2vzf --threads=0 > /mnt/user/media/test This is to take a folder from backup and create the .xz on the media share. The actual shares and file names are just temporary to make sure the function is working before I start doing my large real files. This command works but it literally wraps every single file, so when I start unzipping on my windows machine, I have to go through and unzip the directory, then the file inside etc. I'm used to non tar stuff where you just unzip the original file and everything is open and available from there. I tried messing around without tar'ing it first, but this seems to be mandatory as xz complains the target is a directory otherwise. How can I go about achieving a normal compression structure, as I'm accustom to in windows? Or alternatively how can I decompress this on windows without having to manually extract each and every directory/subdirectory/file etc?
  13. Ah okie, thanks for the info. Hopefully we can implement a different FS for the cache pool in the future to utilize KVM better. Now I just need to know which piece of information about COW is correct
  14. I just added 2 ssd's to my cache pool and put them in raid 0. I am now running my vm disks off that. My first question is about COW - In the release literature it says to disable COW since it negatively impacts vm performance; however, here in this post https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=45484.0 jon says to have it enabled? Can someone verify for me which solution is preferred. Secondly, is there any way to change my cache pool from btrfs to something else? I have read quite a few articles stating kvm has poor performance with that file system. Thanks for all the help as always!!
  15. Awesome thanks! Appreciate all the amazing support here, and I'm learning a lot along the way
  16. Ah ok thanks for all your help! I really appreciate it
  17. Hmm, something is odd on my end then. My etc folder only has a letsencrypt folder inside it, nothing for fail2ban. Also not in the root /etc directory with the cron data in case you meant that one. Edit: I did get the status command working though, thanks!
  18. First off, thanks for the docker! Working great. One semi issue though - where are the fail2ban config files? I see the jail.local but the other configs? I have it working with a htpasswd but it doesn't log anything. I've tried changing the log level with ssh + docker exec but it's not generating a file. There's the access log from nginx but I'd like to be able to see fail2bans stuff directly, like banned ips. I checked iptables -L to see if I could check banned ips, but not seeing there either. Although it is definitely working, I've tested the functionality
  19. Perhaps I was mistaken and had a peripheral device on the network at the time I setup the docker. I just went ahead and re-read the host vs bridged explanation for dockers and I understand now what they meant. Thanks for clearing that up
  20. I just installed the nginx-letsencrypt docker. It's working but I don't understand a quirk about it. It's set in bridge mode, it's drawing an ip from the dhcp(192.168.1.7); however, everything is binding to the unraid default ip of 192.168.1.6. The default landing page is pulling up on 192.168.1.6:5110 (the port I assigned, mostly just for now since 80 is taken on that ip by the unraid webui). Basically, why is it binding to the unraid box ip when it's in bridged mode and successfully drawing an ip from the dhcp?
  21. I had this problem originally, and it was a function of windows trolling. Try closing your file explorer and entering "net use * /delete" in an elevated command prompt. Did the trick for me
  22. I'm starting a new thread here since my last one ended up being a bit of a run on and the problem was never solved. How can I modify unraid so that it accepts the traffic control commands? As of now, it seems that wasn't included in the kernel. The kvm <bandwidth> tags in the xml don't help either because those are just short hand for calling on tc. I don't want an OS level or router based solution, so I would really prefer to add kernel support to this function. Thanks!
  23. Ah ok, thanks for the explanation and the help, I really appreciate it! The system has 16 gigs available. I have 7 gigs to this vm, and 5 to another, but since just this 1 vm is so demanding I haven't even been running the other for now. I am curious about older windows versions as well, just because I see the 6.2 build having a lot of discussion/issues with win 10 performance. I'm not sure how that reflects upon my stable version but I imagine it can't be great at this point. Do you know if win 8 is perfected in kvm yet, or is 7 the most stable? A lot of performance increases in the later windows compared to 7 but I'm not sure how much time the kvm development people need to really get things hashed out.
  24. Well, it seemed to help kind of. Utilization in the vm is better(about 10% less than before), but still getting bad spikes. Dashboard actually spikes up to 99% util from just the 1 emulation. I noticed you removed one of the cores, are we just leaving that to unraid? I'm trying to google about cpu pinning atm to better understand what the changes being made are as well