camprman

I'm having the same issues. I looked to see if my cache were going to read only, but so far I'm not having that issue. I'm attaching my diagnostics after a reboot, and trying to update a docker. Thank you! ETA: I can write to cache, so I don't know what's going on. tower-diagnostics-20230628-2056.zip

Thank you for trying. I understand their requirements. It doesn't change that I prefer NZBGet, and I'll continue to use it for as long as I possibly can.

There has been a fork with the NZBGet: https://github.com/nzbget-ng/nzbget Details: Note: this repo is a fork of the original github project nzbget/nzbget originally written by @hugbug. He deserves all the credit for this software. Since he has now archived the project, I've combined my changes (surgical fixes to accomodate the intentially-malformed 'wtf' NZB headers, which result in the infamous 'abc.xyz' file names) and merged several pull requests from the original repo. Paul, 2022.11.28 I'm hoping that LinuxServer will point to the fork. I'm guessing no, but I can hope.

Were you able to resolve this? If so, what did you have to do?

Just sent you a PM

Do you still have a 1015 available?

Ok, we can close. I don't have an answer as to why it was this way, but I said screw it, backed up the USB, and wiped it clean. Put my pro key back on and booted. Just have to redo some stuff, including drives, but it's functional, and with a clean boot.

I just upgraded from 6.1.9 to 6.3.5. I have 4 SDD drives in the cache pool or at least I did. Now I'm seeing unassigned under Cache, and while I can see the drives, I can't select them. I tried creating a New Config, but again I can't select any drives for cache. I'm sure I'm missing something, just not sure what. Please help

But to answer your question no WebUI at all, until I found the advice I needed to at least get it to maintenance.

Within 5 minutes I found a post advising how to get the server into maintenance mode. I am at that point, so at the very least, I have a little light.

I am stuck. I have searched here and while others have had the error and suggested running xfs_repair, I'm not able to see it run. I have no webpage, so I can't put it into maintenance mode, and while I'm able to telnet in, when I enter the command and hit return, nothing appears to happen. Attached is a screenshot of the error.

Thank you johnnie.black. That would have been the absolute worst. I ran reiserfsck on both disk8 and disk9 with no corruptions and not having to do any rebuilds. New drives should be here tomorrow.

Here you go. The device is sdl. tower-diagnostics-20160819-1805.zip

Just my fear of losing files. I'm not afraid that the swap-disable feature will delete data so much as I'm worried about Mr. Murphy.

I've been very lucky over the years, but my luck has finally ran out. I knew I had a drive failing but being on a fixed income, I had to wait to buy a new drive. The drive has now failed, and without looking or thinking I bought 2 new 4tb drives. Right now my parity drive is 3tb and the drive that has gone down is also 3tb. From all that I've read it appears that since I didn't think before I ordered my only option is to do a swap-disable. Right now the emulated drive is functional as expected, but I just don't have the room to try to copy everything off before doing the swap. I'm more than a little nervous, and just wonder if there is anything I can do short of copying before doing the swap-disable? I suppose you could say I'm a little overwhelmed at the moment.

Strange, I haven't had that issue at all. I have rebooted/powered on/started/and shut down from ipmi. If that didn't work for me, it would truly be an epic fail. Maybe I just got lucky?

Just a quick add, that I passed that very same NEC USB card to my Unraid VM with 0 issues. Fast too!

Strangely enough, no. Did you have issues with Samsungs?

I should add that flashing the onboard SAS to IT mode was very simple and painless. I got this MoBo for the same price as the model without the SAS onboard, so that is why I went this direction. Price truly was the winning factor for me. I couldn't be happier with this setup.

OS at time of building: v5.0-beta12a CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1240 Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1155 80W Quad-Core Motherboard: Tyan S5512WGM2NR RAM: 2x Kingston 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM ECC Unbuffered DDR3 1333 (PC3 10600) Server Memory Total: 16GB Case: NORCO RPC-4224 4U Rackmount Chassis Power Supply: SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W ATX12V V2.3/EPS 12V V2.91 SLI Ready 80 PLUS GOLD Certified Modular Active PFC Power Supply SATA Expansion Card(s): None yet Cables: 2x NORCO C-SFF8087-4S Discrete to SFF-8087 (Reverse breakout) Fans: Stock Parity Drive: WD 3TB 5400 RPM SATA 64MB Cache Data Drives: 1 3TB, 2 2TB, 3 1.5TB More to come Cache Drive: 1TB 5400 RPM 32MB Cache Total Drive Capacity: 9.5TB Esxi 5 running with Unraid virtual, and Windows 2008 R2 server I absolutely love this server especially coming from the Frankenstein I had. I had an old pc P4 1GB with poor cooling. This is a phenomenal server. I plan to add/replace to 3TB or 4TB as time and funds allow.

4 VMs and I haven't even made my 1240 break a sweat yet! LOL

I would go with the E3 1230. Other than that, everything sounds awesome. The 1230 has hyperthreading where the 1220 does not.

JimWhite is using this board for his esxi server and passing through to Unraid. He did have to put the SAS into IT mode. Definitely not saying one is better than another, just loved the price I got, and the options I will now have.

This mobo is incredibly interesting....pls link to your new thread when you start it. I love that it has the SAS2008 onboard. That would free me up to pass thru more PCI devices to my guests. Hmmmm....you've made me a little jealous Yea I definitely had looked at that board as well. The one thing that occurred to me though, and maybe I'm wrong, but if you decided to go the tyan route, wouldn't it be cheaper and with possibly some advantages to going the sister model without the Integrated SAS ports? Assuming you weren't in some odd position getting the SAS model for significantly less than the normal price difference between it and the non-SAS version, buying the non-sas mb + a SAS card for 60ish would net you some spare cash. The non-SAS version has an extra 8x port that wasn't dedicated to the integrated controller, so you haven't lost or gained anything there. And you're dealing with actual SAS connections on the card so if you did want to break out an expander, it'd probably be easier, not to mention cleaner than having 14 sata ports in that one corner. That being said, its still a very attractive option, amd I'm (very) slightly kicking myself on buying my x9scm, not because it's not a fantastic board, but because I'm having to screw around to fit a 16x length card in one of the 8x's (hooray for odd solutions). I got the MoBo on sale, so that is what really put it over the edge. I had been going back and forth, but with the sale price, it was a no-brainer.