• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

daemonix's Achievements


Rookie (2/14)



  1. Did you get anywhere with this? I just got something similar on an Epyc Milan unraid system.... kernel:[1220181.434892] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 31 on CPU 104. kernel:[1220181.434893] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? kernel:[1220181.434893] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel:[1220250.396968] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 21 on CPU 12. kernel:[1220250.396969] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? kernel:[1220250.396970] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
  2. Anyone has a mirror of the last (or any!) "openvpn_client_x64.plg" File? I have it running on 3 boxes and it works great. Im building a new box so I need to install it. Is there another openvpn client for the bare metal unraid?
  3. After rebooting I got this error too: internal error: qemu unexpectedly closed the monitor: 2019-10-31T16:26:57.823841Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device pcie-pci-bridge,id=pci.7,bus=pci.1,addr=0x0: Bus 'pci.1' not found syslog: Oct 31 16:26:58 Tower kernel: vfio-pci 0000:af:00.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=none
  4. Everything regarding GPU passthrough was ok with my unraid servers (I have 3 servers all with Linux and Win passthrough VMs, for CUDA) but now one system will not boot any VM with passthrough. It works (randomly?) one the first boot after the install of a VM but then the GPU stops working (no CUDA calls work) at a random point. Error attached below. Any idea what this can be? I even upgraded to the latest RC unraid but no luck. Any troubleshooting advice?
  5. I realised that at some point (I;ve been using unraid on multiple server for months now) I lost access to https. http works and everything else seems the same. nmap says ports are open but I get a "ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED". What can be the problem?
  6. hello, Anyone managed to run a VIVE pro via unraid? Im having trouble with the multiple USB on one ID and the hardcoded address doesnt work. (seems that the new camera on top of vive is not working on the correct speed) Any ideas? Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0781:5567 SanDisk Corp. Cruzer Blade Bus 001 Device 003: ID 413c:2105 Dell Computer Corp. Model L100 Keyboard Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0557:7000 ATEN International Co., Ltd Hub Bus 001 Device 007: ID 0557:2419 ATEN International Co., Ltd Bus 001 Device 072: ID 0bb4:030e HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 073: ID 0bb4:030a HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 074: ID 0bb4:0306 HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 075: ID 0bb4:030a HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 076: ID 0bb4:0309 HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 077: ID 0bb4:030b HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 001 Device 078: ID 28de:2101 Bus 001 Device 079: ID 28de:2101 Bus 001 Device 080: ID 28de:2300 Bus 001 Device 122: ID 045e:00cb Microsoft Corp. Basic Optical Mouse v2.0 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 024: ID 0bb4:030e HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 002 Device 025: ID 0bb4:030a HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 002 Device 026: ID 0bb4:030c HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.) Bus 002 Device 027: ID 0bb4:030a HTC (High Tech Computer Corp.)
  7. hi all, a full "reset to manufacturer settings" on the HP 380 BIOS helped a lot!!!! ? definitely no overhead and higher CPU clock speed. CPUs are 2699v4 so turbo speed seems to be 3.6Ghz. At the moment I can see some cores going up to 3.2-3.3Ghz but I think its ok as the full turbo is for some cores only?!?! (right?) Regarding Proliant seetings, here is a tour of the BIOS and the possible settings. -At the moment I run the "Balanced" setting from the BIOS and the Performance setting on unraid Tweaks. The custom options seem similar to the settings you posted above but Im not sure. There is no TURBO setting on Unraid though!!! So with basic/auto 'balance performance and savings' mode: no overhead to non-pinned/non-isolated cores at all!!!
  8. you are correct! indeed HP-2699v4 CPU is not going up to turbo speed, while the other one is OK. pcc-cpufreq on HP and acpi-cpufreq on the Supermicro (the one that performs OK) How do I get intel_pstate on unraid? Both unraid setups are very basic with just VM and one docker (syntching) running.
  9. testing update!!! I think my HP Proliant has a configuration problem or something... I run sysbench on my 'workstation' hardware based on supermicro and 60 core VM rum with almost ZERO utilisation on the remaining cpus Look at this results from a dual 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6154 CPU @ 3.00GHz': (BLUE ON htop is just docker/syntching, nothing to worry about). This time I had NO emupin and all 60 vCPU are isolated. Look at the sysbench latency too, nice and cool. Whats should I do on the HP 380g8 as a troubleshooting steps? reset BIOS settings? thanks
  10. yes exactly. The cores are the same its a numbering issue, this is why I added the image as it was weird for me to understand. As you can see the emupin are almost free (a bit of activity on one core) and the remaining unraid (un-isolated) cores are almost maxed out! even the webGUI is slower
  11. So I isolated 80 cpus, from that I gave 4 to emupin and 76 to one VM. As you can see it seems that the leftover cores for unraid are going crazy instead of the emupin cores.. At times (htop image) unraid WEBGUI is extremely slow and you have to wait 10 sec to refresh the VM or docker page. append isolcpus=2-21,46-65,24-43,68-87 initrd=/bzroot
  12. another question: Is it better to get all the vCPUs from one physical CPU for a single VM? or half from CPU0 and half from CPU1? Im thinking about memory 'channels' etc on dual Xeons
  13. really appreciate this!! Is there a rule for the emupin? the move vCPU on the VM the more emupins?