woocash

I guess that was the fastest and finest diagnosis of any problem I had ever. 160MBps now Worked like a charm, appreciate it! Curious about that cache being disabled everywhere, even though in BIOS it's enabled. Will investigate further and update this post if i find the reason. Wonder if maybe DiskSpeed or other benchmarking tool i used, disabled it to get more "pure" results.

Yes, read speed from data disk is the same as write speed to parity disk - around 45-49 MBps. Not sure if I named it correctly - basically in my array there is one 8TB data drive. I added another identical 8TB new and empty drive to the array as parity disk. I clicked "Parity-sync/data rebuild" to fill parity disk with parity data. Since then the speed of this process is very slow. The caching is enabled in BIOS. Looking through diagnostics I found lsscsi.txt which showed queue_depth of both my 8TB drives as 1, which if i understand correctly means NCQ is disabled. On the other hand in unRaid settings, NCQ is set to be enabled. Could this be the problem? I do attach diagnostics below.

I am, the data drive has read speed matching the write speed of parity drive. Currently 47,9 MBps. If it helps diagnostically, I'm running 6.7.0-rc7

Thanks for the answer. In disk settings, the Tunable(md_write_method), is since 5 minutes after the installation set to "reconstruct write". Is it possible that the disks do not use the setting, or have it reset somehow? Can i verify the method that is actually in use?

Hi there! Let me start by saying that i am just trying unRaid for the last few days and like it a lot! I do have a question about parity calculation though. My HW is HP Microserver gen8 with G1610T CPU, two WD REDs 3 TB, two shucked HGST HE 8TB and 128GB SSD for cache. In my PC al HDDs bench slightly below 200MBps, in unRaid while doing parity calculation with only 2x8TB connected (2x3TB are unmounted, and not associated) the speed I am seeing is 40-50MBps. Is this to be expected? CPU load is never greater than 20%, so what is the bottleneck here?