Mattaton

Members
  • Posts

    112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Mattaton's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

8

Reputation

  1. I need some help with getting my unifi-controller container accessible via swag. I think because the unifi-controller webui uses https without a cert, then nginx can't resolve it and I get a 502 error from Cloudflare. From my nginx unifi conf file: include /config/nginx/proxy.conf; include /config/nginx/resolver.conf; set $upstream_app 192.168.75.13; set $upstream_port 8443; set $upstream_proto https; proxy_pass $upstream_proto://$upstream_app:$upstream_port; I've tried changing the $upstream_port to just 443. The container has port 8443 set as the webui port. This is definitely the url for accessing the webui locally: https://192.168.75.13:8443/ Swag is on my proxy network, and the unifi-controller container is on br0 with a specified IP. The nginx error logs say: 2023/01/02 15:49:42 [error] 1943#1943: *15046 connect() failed (113: Host is unreachable) while connecting to upstream, client: -publicIP-, server: unifi.*, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://192.168.75.13:8443/", host: "unifi.domain.com" 2023/01/02 15:49:45 [error] 1943#1943: *15046 connect() failed (113: Host is unreachable) while connecting to upstream, client: -publicIP-, server: unifi.*, request: "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://192.168.75.13:8443/favicon.ico", host: "unifi.domain.com", referrer: "https://unifi.domain.com/" I have a FreeIPA server being accessed the same way, specifying an IP address as opposed to the name of a container, and it works fine. The big difference is the FreeIPA server does not use https. Any suggestions are appreciated! Thanks!
  2. I wrote down what NerdPack had installed prior to uninstalling and then installing NerdTools. Everything that NerdPack had installed is not listed on NerdTools. Should I assume all of these things are built into unRAID now? I didn't write down the entire name of the package, but here is what I had: sysstat perl mcelog kbd iperf (I see from the pinned comment that this is included with unRAID) Thanks! UPDATE: Okay, I see from the 6.11 release notes that all but the kbd package is included. Maybe I wrote that one down wrong?
  3. So, did you use swag? I have reverse proxy set up for several dockers already. For instance, it works fine for NextCloud, but I used the included NextCloud conf file in nginx (plus I had SpaceInvaderOne's video guide). There isn't an included conf file for SearXNG, so I've tried to build one based on NextCloud, but no matter what, the docker list always says the external port for SearXNG is 8080, whereas it's 443 for NextCloud. I'm most definitely a novice when it comes to this stuff, so extrapolating from other things doesn't always go well. ๐Ÿ˜„ If you used Swag, can I see what your nginx conf file looks like? Thanks!
  4. @irishjd did you ever het this working? I'm in the same boat. I have Swag pointing at it, but I get the same "502 Bad Gateway" as @elvismercado when I try to access it via https. I can get it to work with http, but not with https. There has to be something in the SearXNG settings that we're missing.
  5. Thank you so much! That did it! WOO! ๐Ÿ™‚ And my phone just started autp-uploading photos like mad! ๐Ÿ˜„
  6. Bumping this since it got buried pretty quick... I've had Nextcloud working fine for well over a year, but now my devices say the server is unavailable. Checking the server, NC is stuck in maintenance mode. If I manually turn maintenance mode off, the web ui then says there's an update to the mail app. When I try to update it, it says an error occurred and it goes back into maintenance mode. The "detailed logs" after the failed update says: So I'm stuck with either a mail update screen or a maintenance mode screen. Both result in a server that is unavailable/offline. I just updated to the latest nextcloud version, hoping that would knock out the issue, but no luck. I don't use the mail app, so I'm also fine if that could just be disabled to get around this. I still consider myself an unRAID/docker novice, but I can follow instructions. ๐Ÿ˜„ Thanks for any help!
  7. I've had Nextcloud working fine for well over a year, but now my devices say the server is unavailable. Checking the server, NC is stuck in maintenance mode. If I manually turn maintenance mode off, the web ui then says there's an update to the mail app. When I try to update it, it says an error occurred and it goes back into maintenance mode. The "detailed logs" after the failed update says: So I'm stuck with either a mail update screen or a maintenance mode screen. Both result in a server that is unavailable/offline. I just updated to the latest nextcloud version, hoping that would knock out the issue, but no luck. I don't use the mail app, so I'm also fine if that could just be disabled to get around this. I still consider myself an unRAID/docker novice, but I can follow instructions. ๐Ÿ˜„ Thanks for any help!
  8. So, make fun of me, I can take it, but I am not comfortable with CLI-based solutions. I feel like it's way too convoluted compared to GUI solutions. Yes, I do come from a primarily Windows workflow and have very limited knowledge of Linux-like environments. But, I love unRAID. ๐Ÿ˜„ Currently I am using SyncBack Pro on Windows to copy data from shares, over the network, and then back to the shared external drive plugged into the unRAID box. Obviously, this is slow (45-ish MiB/s) and I know I could do much better with a backup solution running directly on unRAID. Basically, I want a simple mirror to run nightly. Nothing overlay fancy yet, but I would like everything to be one-to-one. No compression or obfuscation. I found talk of Borg, and it supposedly has a GUI, but when I got into it, it still seems very CLI and config file based. Any help is appreciated!
  9. We have a Veeam v11 backup running on a Windows Server 2016 machine. It backs up 3 Virtual Machines to our unRAID NAS. I am getting these errors fairly often, but not every time. Here's an example: Agent: Failed to process method {Transform.Patch}: An unexpected network error occurred. Failed to flush file buffers. File: [\\AP-ARCHIVES\BU_APServers\AP_VM_Backup\AP-Files.4d02479f-1280-4619-adcd-acd4831be3c4D2022-02-24T190053_66FD.vbk]. Agent: Failed to process method {Transform.Patch}: An unexpected network error occurred. Failed to flush file buffers. File: [\\AP-ARCHIVES\BU_APServers\AP_VM_Backup\AP-AD.9afa42e3-468c-499a-904a-c931eaa3112aD2022-02-24T190053_ED77.vbk]. I've also attached a screenshot of the Veeam report. You can see at the bottom it still says Success for all 3 VMs. So weird. Veeam support wants me to run Wireshark on our network to make sure specified ports are open, but since it runs sometimes, it doesn't seem like it'd be a port issue. Our external IT firm agrees that it doesn't seem to be a port issue. They blame the unRAID NAS since they aren't familiar with unRAID. And they could be right. I've just never had trouble with running backups to unRAID with apps other than Veeam. Has anyone out there used Veeam with unRAID? Thanks! ap-archives-diagnostics-20220309-1537.zip
  10. I use RDP for Windows. I'd love something similar for MacOS. I'm completely new to MacOS, in general, let alone VMs. Splashtop and NoMachine are meh, too. I like how RDP uses my local display resolution as though I just connected that display to the actual machine.
  11. Sorry. I'm late to the party. I see what you're talking about now. If it has a graphics card passed through (and with it, its graphical horsepower), will VNC access be smoother? Good question. And this is me speculating, because I don't know...my limited understanding is that VNC acts as its own display with drivers, etc. like a real graphics card. I'm not sure that the horsepower from a graphics card will affect VNC access at all. It seems like they'd be separate to me. When I access my Windows PC via VNC, it's still more sluggish than the physical hardware experience, even over the local network.
  12. I would think it'd be night and day. Any computer is more sluggish accessed via VNC.
  13. Myself and others have had the exact same problem. I'm a complete newb and I eventually got it going through the messages in this thread. Although, I did end up doing the VM manually rather than via MIAB.
  14. I'm gonna have to buy you your drink of choice for all this knowledge you're slapping me with. ๐Ÿ˜„ Very much appreciated, sir! I'll be putting all this to use this evening! Well, most of it anyway. ๐Ÿ™‚