Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Unraid

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Disk unmountable, check filesystem missing from gui, can't find superblock

Featured Replies

All of a sudden one of my disks gave me the dreaded error of unmountable, no supported file system :(

 

Disk 4 - HUH721010AL4204_7PH0NGHC (sde)

 

Check xfs filesystem is totally missing from the gui for this disk, but there for all the other array disks?

Running a check from the CLI comes back with could not find a valid secondary superblock

 

Where do I go from here apart from just replacing the drive?

 

Diagnostics zip attached

darkstor-diagnostics-20230810-2128.zip

Edited by zer0zer0

  • Community Expert
3 hours ago, zer0zer0 said:

apart from just replacing the drive?

That won't help, start the array in maintenance mode and post the output of:

xfs_repair -v /dev/md4p1

 

  • Author
12 hours ago, JorgeB said:

That won't help, start the array in maintenance mode and post the output of:

xfs_repair -v /dev/md4p1

 


It’s going to take a while 😃

 

why /dev/md4p1 and not /dev/sde?

1 hour ago, zer0zer0 said:

why /dev/md4p1 and not /dev/sde?

The md part makes sure you keep parity valid, if you alter the sd device you would need to rebuild parity. The Xp1 part designates which disk and partition to target, if you scan sde it will miss the filesystem because it's inside the first partition.

  • Author

Same result unfortunately :(

 

Sorry, could not find valid secondary super block

Edited by zer0zer0

  • Community Expert

Are you sure that this was ever formatted? Kind of strange that the filesystem is set to auto, assuming it's still sde post the output of:

fdisk -l /dev/sde

 

  • Author
5 hours ago, JorgeB said:

Are you sure that this was ever formatted? Kind of strange that the filesystem is set to auto, assuming it's still sde post the output of:

fdisk -l /dev/sde

 

 

It was definitely formatted with xfs and then all of a sudden just threw that error

 

root@DARKSTOR:~# fdisk -l /dev/sde
Disk /dev/sde: 9.1 TiB, 10000831348736 bytes, 2441609216 sectors
Disk model: HUH721010AL4204
Units: sectors of 1 * 4096 = 4096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 14CEF3CF-1F72-48D2-8C97-83C61932AE02

Device     Start        End    Sectors  Size Type
/dev/sde1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem


 

  • Community Expert

That start sector is wrong, should be 64, something messed with your partition/disk, you can try running testdisk to see if it finds the old partition.

 

 

  • Author
9 hours ago, JorgeB said:

That start sector is wrong, should be 64, something messed with your partition/disk, you can try running testdisk to see if it finds the old partition.

 

 

 

Hmm, all of the other disks also start at 8?

 

Device     Start        End    Sectors  Size Type
/dev/sdb1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem
/dev/sdc1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem
/dev/sdd1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem
/dev/sde1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem
/dev/sdf1      8 2441609210 2441609203  9.1T Linux filesystem

 

Edited by zer0zer0

  • Community Expert

My bad, missed that you are using 4Kn disks, with 512E disks the partition starts at sector 64, but since with 4Kn each sector is 8 times bigger, 64/8=8, it just means that's not the problem, if you are certain the disk was formatted with xfs you can try running a file recovery util like UFS explorer to see if it can recover any data, just to scan the disk you can use the free trial.

  • Author

So, it won't rebuild from parity?

 

That data is only recoverable using testdisk or similar?

  • Community Expert
11 hours ago, zer0zer0 said:

So, it won't rebuild from parity?

If parity is in sync the result will most likely be the same, but you can try, unassign the disk (keep this disk intact), start the array, see if the emulated disk mounts, if it doesn't try running xfs_repair on the emulated disk.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.