DougShields Posted November 14, 2023 Share Posted November 14, 2023 I was doing some research today, thought I would pass this along. Looking at the SD-PEX40163 8 Port SATA III to PCIe 3.0 x1 NON-RAID Expansion Card SD-PEX40163 Uses Two ASM1064 connected to a ASM1182e PCI-e Bridge and the SI-PEX40165 8 Port SATA III to PCIe 3.0 x1 NON-RAID Expansion Card SI-PEX40165 Uses Two ASM1064 connected to a ASM1806 PCI-e Bridge The ASM1182e and the ASM1806 are PCIe 2.0 bridge chips, so the description of the card as being PCIe 3.0 x1 is wrong. The ASM1064 is a PCIe 3.0 chip, but that doesn’t matter once it’s behind the PCIe 2.0 bridge chip. ASM1806 ASM1182e ASM1064 It looks like the 16 port SD-PEX40164 uses Four ASM1064 with an ASM2806 which is PCIe 3.1, but for double the price. I've e-mailed Syba USA to see if they have an explanation, but I don't expect a real answer. Background: This is for legacy spinning rust, the main storage is NVMe, the good slots have NICs in them, so I'm looking at PCIe 3.0 x1 cards for good reason. Quote Link to comment
ConnerVT Posted November 14, 2023 Share Posted November 14, 2023 Anything that is taking 1 PCIe lane to 8 SATA ports must be using a multiplier. Quote Link to comment
DougShields Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 On 11/14/2023 at 4:25 PM, ConnerVT said: Anything that is taking 1 PCIe lane to 8 SATA ports must be using a multiplier. Not necessarily - usually it's a multiplier, but that is not the only possible solution. A multiplier splits at the SATA level, a bridge splits at the PCIe level. It is effectively the same as having additional controllers. In this case two ASM1064 controllers which have 4 ports each. With the obvious limitation that they must split bandwidth. Some of the LSI SAS HBAs are actually very similar where they plant 2 controllers on 1 card in order to double the port count while also doubling the capacity and cost. Quote Link to comment
ChatNoir Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 11 hours ago, DougShields said: Some of the LSI SAS HBAs are actually very similar where they plant 2 controllers on 1 card in order to double the port count while also doubling the capacity and cost. Which can be fine as long as you double the number of PCIe lanes. Here, it is still 8 SATA ports on a x1. Unless I made a mistake on my (early morning) math, even HDDs will have their max bandwidth seriously limited. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.