Display Network-Name instead ofp Network-ID in GUI?

[tescher]

Hi all,

I'm new to Unraid, but it' s a great product.

My question is regarding docker. I have created a custom network with docker network create traefik_proxy

I've installed my traefik as a yml (see below).

Sadly in the GUI, the network ID is displayed, but not the network name. Can I fix this?

 

this is my stack:

 

---
version: '3.7'

services:
  traefik:
    image: traefik:v2.11.0
    container_name: traefik
    volumes:
      - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
      - /etc/timezone:/etc/timezone:ro
      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
      - ./config:/etc/traefik
    labels:
      - "traefik.enable=true"
      - "traefik.http.routers.traefik.rule=Host(`traefik.xxxxxxxxx.xx`) && (PathPrefix(`/api`) || PathPrefix(`/dashboard`))"
      - "traefik.http.routers.traefik.entrypoints=websecure"
      - "traefik.http.routers.traefik.tls.certresolver=default"
      - "traefik.http.routers.traefik.service=api@internal"
      - "traefik.http.routers.traefik.middlewares=auth@docker"
      - "traefik.http.middlewares.auth.basicauth.users=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
    networks:
      - traefik_proxy
#      - default
    ports:
      - "80:80"
      - "443:443"
    restart: always

networks:
  traefik_proxy:
    name: traefik_proxy
    external: true

 

Edited February 27 by tescher

[JT Marshall]

I’m having the same issue.

 

[alozzi]

Were you able to resolve it? I'm facing the exact same issue. I do not know how to display the network name instead of its ID.

Thanks!

[JT Marshall]

Sure didn’t. It’s not a deal breaker, just makes the ui look weird. It only stresses me out when I’m checking in on a docker issue so I haven’t spent too much time on it. 

[alozzi]

If you only need to run one docker service (not a complex compose stack), you can do so by creating the container through Unraid UI (Add Container) or using the docker CLI. It worked for me; The network name is displayed correctly.
I wasn't able to achieve the same result through compose.

Edited March 10 by alozzi

[JT Marshall]

That’s a work around that I’ve used before. I prefer using docker compose due to its portability but that’s a totally viable alternative.

[sage2050]

looking for a solution to this as well.