May 2, 201412 yr This just started happening and I have no idea why. My parity check just completed today and there were 0 errors When I try to rename a folder on the tower I get a message in windows saying that it is in use by another program. I even rebooted the tower and I still get the same thing. I am using 5.0.5. I have not updated UNRAID in about a month. Really lost on this one. Any ideas on where I can look? Thanks
May 2, 201412 yr Could be a problem on the Windows side. Try renaming it with MidnightCommander(MC) or the command line in unRAID and see if you get a "in use" type of error.
May 2, 201412 yr Author I was wondering if Windows could be the issue. I will try it from a different computer and see if I get the same problem.
May 2, 201412 yr Author It is definitely just the one tower. My other 2 towers are just fine. I have no idea why this is happening.
May 2, 201412 yr Author I logged on with putty and tried this: root@Tower:/mnt/disk4/Data# mkdir Test mkdir: cannot create directory `Test': Read-only file system root@Tower:/mnt/disk4/Data# Why would this happen? My parity check finished yesterday with no errors at all. Please help
May 3, 201412 yr Could be a reiserfs problem, search for dgaschk as they link to a check file systems wiki that may help Sent from a mobile device, sorry for any typos.
May 3, 201412 yr http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php?title=Check_Disk_Filesystems Just 'Check' don't try to FIX until you check back in with results...
May 3, 201412 yr Author It appears to only be disk4 on tower #1 I am running the check now Will post results
May 3, 201412 yr Author Here are the results: root@Tower:~# reiserfsck --check /dev/md4 reiserfsck 3.6.24 Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/md4 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Fri May 2 10:01:56 2014 ########### Replaying journal: Trans replayed: mountid 164, transid 6364468, desc 795, len 1, commit 797, next trans offset 780 Trans replayed: mountid 164, transid 6364469, desc 798, len 1, commit 800, next trans offset 783 Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/md4' in blocks [18..8211]: 2 transactions replayed Checking internal tree.. \/ 16 (of 20//140 (of 160-/ 40 (of 170-block 179078502: The level of the node (28559) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (179078502), whole subtree is skipped /152 (of 160|/ 1 (of 170/block 181121860: The level of the node (38251) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (181121860), whole subtree is skipped finished Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs. Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped 2 found corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree ########### reiserfsck finished at Fri May 2 10:24:14 2014 ###########
May 3, 201412 yr Okay. NOW YOU NEED AN EXPERT...to quote the Wiki: "Important Note!!! Do NOT run reiserfsck with the --rebuild-sb or --rebuild-tree switches, unless you are instructed to, by the instruction of a previous run of reiserfsck, or by an expert user! They are last-resort options, to repair a severely damaged Reiser file system, and recover as much as possible. They almost always create a lost+found directory and place in it the files, directories, and parts of files it can recover. It will then be up to you to rename them and restore those files and directories to their correct locations. Many times it will be possible to identify them by their contents, or their size." I'd probably run "reiserfsck --rebuild-tree /dev/md4", but that's 'cuz I have backups and love living on the edge. But I'm not that expert to tell you to do the same. There are a number of experts here...they'll chime in shortly, I'm sure.
May 3, 201412 yr Author OK hopefully an expert will chime in. I have to go to bed. Too tired to stay up I will be checking once I get up. Hopefully this can be resolved Thanks for your help
May 3, 201412 yr Author Here are the last of the results: Pass 1 (will try to insert 466798 leaves): ####### Pass 1 ####### Looking for allocable blocks .. finished 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% left 0, 105 /sec Flushing..finished 466798 leaves read 466658 inserted 140 not inserted ####### Pass 2 ####### Pass 2: 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% left 0, 18 /sec Flushing..finished Leaves inserted item by item 140 Pass 3 (semantic): ####### Pass 3 ######### ... ownload/Games/PC Game ISOs/Grand Theft Auto 4/Grand.Theft.Auto.4.Disc.1.isovpf-10680: The file [483973 483991] has the wrong block count in the StatData (8989304) - corrected to (8151192) ... ownload/Games/PC Game ISOs/Grand Theft Auto 4/Grand.Theft.Auto.4.Disc.3.isovpf-10680: The file [483973 483994] has the wrong block count in the StatData (8704456) - corrected to (6440504) Flushing..finished Files found: 111324 Directories found: 11756 Broken (of files/symlinks/others): 2 Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files): ####### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) ######### Looking for lost directories: Flushing..finished78, 75 /sec Pass 4 - finished done 465925, 61 /sec Deleted unreachable items 380 Flushing..finished Syncing..finished ########### reiserfsck finished at Sat May 3 04:10:17 2014 ###########
May 4, 201412 yr hmmmm... So it sounds as if your array's file structure is back to stable. (i'd run ReiserFS with JUST the 'check' option again, just to be sure) Unfortunately, it looks as if it deleted some data, and didn't have enough to even put it in Lost and Found.Pass 4 - finished done 465925, 61 /sec Deleted unreachable items 380
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.