AndrewSatellite Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Hi all. I am new to unRAID and a bit hesitant to ask, but I am curious as to why I can't seem to add. I am pretty sure if I add 2x 1TB and 1x 256GB into a single cache pool, I would total 2.256TB + - of storage. unRAID seems to think it creates 1.1TB. I am sure i have only pooled it and not used any parity or other features, but I just can't be sure. Have made some unbelievably embarrassing mistake? Kind regards, Andrew Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 It's a btrfs limitation: https://lime-technology.com/forums/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=480420 Quote Link to comment
NewDisplayName Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 (edited) (u dont want to add them all as cache) so more space can be used. Like 1 cache device (best is ssd) and rest in array. "Standard" Config would be like this: 1x cache (e.g. SSD) - for fast writing to array 1x parity (so if one drive of the array fail, u wont loose anything) and as much array drives as u want/have/need Edited March 8, 2018 by nuhll Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 You have to use btrfs raid0 if you want the full capacity with no redundancy. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 15 minutes ago, trurl said: You have to use btrfs raid0 if you want the full capacity with no redundancy. Actually, single profile, raid0 will result in 512GB (256 + 256), only the single profile can use the full 1.25TB. Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: Actually, single profile, raid0 will result in 512GB (256 + 256), only the single profile can use the full 1.25TB. He has 3 disks adding to 2.25. That would be single as well? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 8 minutes ago, trurl said: He has 3 disks adding to 2.25. That would be single as well? Read to fast, though it was 1 + 256, in this case 1.1TB for raid1 is correct, raid0 should use all the space. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.