Jump to content

Issues after replacing failed HDD


Userpaul

Recommended Posts

Unraid 6.5.3

After replacing failed HDD with new hdd and rebooting a parity check and rebuild ran okay. I did have a considerable number of parity issues on two hdds when complete but everything looked okay. All files present. After running parity check again to correct errors I now have some issues i have not come across before. My replacement hdd shows that it has files 720gb used 1.28tb free. Original disk was 750gb. But i cannot access the files or see them.

This seems to be the issue?

"Dec 5 17:44:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS warning: reiserfs-5090 is_tree_node: node level 0 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 5 17:44:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS error (device md14): vs-5150 search_by_key: invalid format found in block 27557505. Fsck? Dec 5 17:44:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md14): Remounting filesystem read-only"

 

Any help or suggestions would be appreciated

 

Thank you

 

Paul

 

https://screenshots.firefox.com/7yaWZJaxmsYSmYK4/tower

tower-syslog-20181205-1903.zip

Link to comment

You need to check filesystem on disk14, but current syslog doesn't show the rebuild, depending on what exactly you mean by this

10 minutes ago, Userpaul said:

I did have a considerable number of parity issues on two hdds when complete but everything looked okay.

rebuilt disk might be corrupt/missing data.

Link to comment

Running now

 

 

reiserfsck 3.6.27 Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/md14 Will put log info to 'stdout' ########### reiserfsck --check started at Wed Dec 5 19:39:32 2018 ########### Replaying journal:

Response

Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/md14' in blocks [18..8211]: 6 transactions replayed Checking internal tree.. finished Comparing bitmaps..Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped 3 found corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree ########### reiserfsck finished at Wed Dec 5 19:41:08 2018 ########### block 154707197: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (154707197), whole subtree is skipped block 65798147: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (2) expected the problem in the internal node occured (65798147), whole subtree is skipped block 177125720: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (3) expected the problem in the internal node occured (177125720), whole subtree is skipped vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs.

 

I'm reading this ..http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php?title=Check_Disk_Filesystems

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...