SNDS Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Hey folks, While I am waiting on my build parts to arrive in order to start tinkering with Unraid, I did some searching on the forums here with mixed results so I wanted to see if the community would be willing to give me some perspective and insight on the cache pool before I get rolling. Is there a limit on how many drives can be in a cache pool? Is there a best practice for the size of a drive? I am using this machine as a Plex server/media sourcer (newsgroups mainly), if that helps. What's the word on NVMe cache pools? Is it any better to use the faster I/O on those devices for my use case (see #2) even if it will over-saturate the array when migrating files? I haven't purchased the cache drives yet because I'm unsure about the above and it will guide my purchase there. Thanks folks! Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 There are many ways to answer your questions and different people will have different uses. Do you have a good idea of the ways in which people typically use cache? How do you intend to use cache? 1 Quote Link to comment
jpowell8672 Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1. Up to 24 devices in the cache pool 2. Depends on amount of data you will be grabbing and how often you want the mover to transfer the data to the array. I would go for a minimum of 256gb ssd. I use 2 1tb m.2 drives in btrfs raid 0 for high I/O and speed but you could do a mirror for protection or just go with one single drive with no loss protection. 3. NVMe is absolutely better but not needed if you don't need the higher I/O and speed. 1 Quote Link to comment
SNDS Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) I don't know how others use the cache specifically. But I know, that for my sake, I want to be able to use newsgroups (apps like Sonarr/Radarr/Lidarr/SABnzbd) and I know they can take a toll on the random read/write of drives when using them conventionally, so I suspect it may be good to have a good cache for writing files coming from newsgroup sources as they could be large and one doesn't want to hammer the actual array until it's time to offload. I could see files up to 25-30gb downloading up to 5-8 files at any given time during much of the day/evening depending on the requests and needs. I'm also considering a LANCache but that won't be a constant download, most likely I'll download a bunch of stuff up front then the LANcache will be refreshed after I have a LAN event at the house. --edit-- Supplemental context: the main use cases for my server are in order of priority - Plex/Newsgroups Downloads/LANCache/Game Servers Edited September 24, 2019 by SNDS Quote Link to comment
SNDS Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 *BUMP* Anyone have thoughts on the drive size and pool size? I'm thinking of going @jpowell8672's route and use dual 1TB NVMe drives in Raid 0 for newsgroup services and LANCache use cases. As an aside, what's the max that one can do for parity drives? I was thinking of getting 2 4TB 7200RPM drives for parity. Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 13 hours ago, SNDS said: use dual 1TB NVMe drives in Raid 0 Are you sure you don't mean raid1? Quote Link to comment
jpowell8672 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 5 hours ago, trurl said: Are you sure you don't mean raid1? Im running 2 Samsung m.2 nvme 970 pro 1tb in raid 0 for the speed and I/O because these are premium quality m.2's which are less likely to fail. Yes I know any can fail at any time but I regularly backup to my array so if 1 or both died I would be fine and not need the raid 1. I get the faster speed, I/O & 2tb of space. Quote Link to comment
SNDS Posted September 25, 2019 Author Share Posted September 25, 2019 3 hours ago, jpowell8672 said: Im running 2 Samsung m.2 nvme 970 pro 1tb in raid 0 for the speed and I/O because these are premium quality m.2's which are less likely to fail. Yes I know any can fail at any time but I regularly backup to my array so if 1 or both died I would be fine and not need the raid 1. I get the faster speed, I/O & 2tb of space. This. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.