July 6, 20205 yr So I set up my unraid server over the last week or 2. Everything went well. Finally got around to running a read check (no parity drive yet) and got 168 errors on one drive. There umc errors I believe, Diagnostic attached, but still. I had funds and "planed" on adding a parity drive this month, but given the status of that disk, I'm guessing the best course of action would be to move some data around so that I can remove that data disk and replace it. And just have to add a parity drive at a later time when funds become available again. Or if there's something else I could do, I'm open to suggestions as what to do. I haven't tried replacing the sata cable yet, but I will. But I'm doubting thats the issue, its an old drive. Thanks. p67-diagnostics-20200706-1515.zip
July 7, 20205 yr Community Expert 10 hours ago, baracas said: and got 168 errors on one drive Since the diags are after rebooting you can't see which drive and what type of errors, I assume disk3 since it appears to be failing, you can run and extended SMART test to config, then copy all the data you can or use ddrescue.
July 7, 20205 yr Author Yeh, sorry I didn't specify its disk 3. I'm in the process of moving data off of it to other places. Extended smart tests error out. I had heard that read errors weren't necessarily the end of the world. But if I were to put parity disk in the array with a disk getting read errors like that, what would happen during a correcting parity check? I don't exactly know myself. But just seems, with my limited knowledge, unwise to leave a suspect disk in a array for long term. Maybe after zeroing it out or something, it may still have a home as a unassigned device or something. idk. Thanks for responding.
July 7, 20205 yr Community Expert 31 minutes ago, baracas said: But if I were to put parity disk in the array with a disk getting read errors like that, what would happen during a correcting parity check? Now it wouldn't be able to sync 100% because of the read errors. 32 minutes ago, baracas said: But just seems, with my limited knowledge, unwise to leave a suspect disk in a array for long term. Correct, parity needs all others disks except one to recover, so a known bad disk should be replaced ASAP or if another one fails you'll be in trouble.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.