• [6.12.9] CIFS: VFS: directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf


    unCoreX
    • Solved Urgent

    Updated my main unraid server. At the end i got this information in the log. And it still growing.

    I did reboot again after the update, but is still there.

    This is no warning, just some information, but like to know what it means :)

    Something I should be worried about or is this just some info in the new Kernel? Can i hide this or is it a easy fix for this?

     

    image.png.77d61e6e0a23c91351accd2e56998a0f.png

    EDIT:

    This has something to do with the SMB share. I just shutdown the containers that i know are using my SMB (I have two NAS)
    And then start it again, the message came back.

    I did teste with other containers that not use SMB, like Heimdall, Dozzle. No messages.
    So maybe this has something todo with the Unassigned Devices plugin?
     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    11 minutes ago, anotherdud3 said:

    I don't fully trust this now, I'll have to go a different way to transfer data, don't have the time to be checking terrabytes worth of data to see if it all copied over correctly and possibly adding duplicates I can't see too. 

    You shouldn't get duplicates because Unraid doesn't allow that.  The issue was with file listings, not with files not getting written or getting corrupted.  File handling was not an issue.

     

    Do a transfer and only copy missing files to save time if you can.  Be sure to upgrade to 6.12.10-rc.1 first.  It does not have the problem.

    Link to comment

    You can use rsync or freefilesync that will list both sides and copy only what's missing. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    54 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

    You can use rsync or freefilesync that will list both sides and copy only what's missing. 

    Thanks, I was aware of rsync etc but wasn't sure if it could see smb shares on a remote device, freefilesync couldn't so had to go sftp and go that way, now chugging along. 

    Guessing you can do it with rsync I'm just clueless on how to do it, freefilesync works with sftp, only a one time sync so will leave it at that. 

    Edited by anotherdud3
    Link to comment
    40 minutes ago, anotherdud3 said:

    Thanks, I was aware of rsync etc but wasn't sure if it could see smb shares on a remote device, freefilesync couldn't so had to go sftp and go that way, now chugging along. 

     

    You can transfer to a share using rsync/Freefilesync, you just have to mount the share to Unraid first. Kinda like a mapped drive in Windows. You can use the Unassigned Devices plugin to take care of the mounting, then rsync or use Freefilesync for the transfer.

    Edited by anibis2
    Link to comment
    24 minutes ago, anibis2 said:

     

    You can transfer to a share using rsync/Freefilesync, you just have to mount the share to Unraid first. Kinda like a mapped drive in Windows. You can use the Unassigned Devices plugin to take care of the mounting, then rsync or use Freefilesync for the transfer.

    I'm using Unassigned Devices plugin already, but freefilesync still can't see the remote share, remotes in the unraid file manager is there and see the shares but they're not visible in freefilesync, checked multiple places. 

    Link to comment
    2 minutes ago, anotherdud3 said:

    I'm using Unassigned Devices plugin already, but freefilesync still can't see the remote share, remotes in the unraid file manager is there and see the shares but they're not visible in freefilesync, checked multiple places. 

     

    It looks like Freefilesync adds /mnt/user as the source storage by default; this won't pick up the remote shares. You'll have to change that to just /mnt, then you'll be able to access /mnt/remotes from Freefilesync. Using /mnt/user will only give your Unraid shares. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    12 hours ago, dlandon said:

    Please update to 6.12.10-rc.1.  It should fix this issue.  It's available on "Next".

     

     

    I no longer see this issue when rsyncing to a remote smb share on 6.12.10-rc.1. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    9 minutes ago, anibis2 said:

     

    It looks like Freefilesync adds /mnt/user as the source storage by default; this won't pick up the remote shares. You'll have to change that to just /mnt, then you'll be able to access /mnt/remotes from Freefilesync. Using /mnt/user will only give your Unraid shares. 

    Well I feel stupid for not noticing that when creating the container, thanks though appreciate your help 

    Link to comment
    20 hours ago, dlandon said:

    Please update to 6.12.10-rc.1.  It should fix this issue.  It's available on "Next".

     

    Hi,
    So far so good. No more errors. I will report back later after some more testing :)

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    8 hours ago, unCoreX said:

    Hi,
    So far so good. No more errors. I will report back later after some more testing :)

    Well have been testing and no more error and the SMB is working normally. Thanks for the fix.

    Link to comment

    Just wanted to add to this thread that I experienced the same error on an SMB linux client when using the 6.1.0-20 kernel (against Unraid v6.12.4 as the SMB server). From other advice, disabling cache on the share made no difference (I'm not willing to downgrade to SMBv1 as per other suggestions).

     

    Rolling back to 6.1.0-18 alleviated the issue.

     

    In order to function correctly in 6.1.0-20, I had to remove the 'noserverino' declaration in my fstab entry for the mount. It will be interesting to see how the behaviour goes vs the mover/inode changes that it was originally there to mitigate.

     

    Link to comment
    3 hours ago, bruce_ said:

    Rolling back to 6.1.0-18 alleviated the issue.

     

    In order to function correctly in 6.1.0-20,

    These versions don't make any sense.

    Link to comment
    12 hours ago, dlandon said:

    These versions don't make any sense.

    They are the linux kernel versions on the client device (that is mounting the Unraid SMB share). Sorry, I guess it could have been clearer.

    Edited by bruce_
    Link to comment



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Status Definitions

     

    Open = Under consideration.

     

    Solved = The issue has been resolved.

     

    Solved version = The issue has been resolved in the indicated release version.

     

    Closed = Feedback or opinion better posted on our forum for discussion. Also for reports we cannot reproduce or need more information. In this case just add a comment and we will review it again.

     

    Retest = Please retest in latest release.


    Priority Definitions

     

    Minor = Something not working correctly.

     

    Urgent = Server crash, data loss, or other showstopper.

     

    Annoyance = Doesn't affect functionality but should be fixed.

     

    Other = Announcement or other non-issue.