Kilrah

https://www.servethehome.com/lsi-sas-2008-raid-controller-hba-information/ Shows as 5GT/s, so Gen2 in the log

SAS2008 is PCIe2 so if it was listed as Gen3 that'd have been a listing error

That's a PCIe2 card, working as such. Quadro might get downgraded because of it, or you have to check BIOS settings

What cards are we talking of?

Looks like mine is already on 3.0.2, did nothing. Current template already has a secret key variable in the advanced section.

I meant more "see how much data there is, compare to typical drive read speed" but that works too. That was in response to you seeing it used to be fast and now it's slow, if that was both with the same options then either you now have much more data or something's going wrong if it now takes longer for the same amount of data. Don't know of one but you could probably make a script that checks whether rsync succeeded or errored and retries if it errored.

One of your drives keeps disconnecting, seems to be sdk. You didn't post full diagnostics so can't really give more details.

Clearing the secure boot keys was the issue, you don't want to do that.

I would run checksum once or twice a year to verify that the data hasn't been corrupted for some reason, but also in a way that it only shows discrepancies instead of updating so I can verify which side is correct. Would also check how long it should take to read that amount of data and check it takes about the expected time when it runs to hopefully catch a failing drive that's slower than it should.

Probably want to remove --checksum, that means each side will need to read the entirety of each file on both sides every time it runs.

The repo has a rule about it, you may or may not agree with it but it's there and submissions need to follow it. If you don't agree then you don't submit. If you do anyway don't be surprised if you get refused. Even more so when OP demonstrated his lack of care/concern by asking where the rules were and being pointed to them, showing he didn't even bother with the basics.

No, but you should be posting in that app's support thread.

In theory yes but the process is known to commonly lead to low quality, and people to often not take the time to verify and fix that. If someone had to write something themselves they will have had no choice than to put in the effort to write it. When they use AI "just post the output, it saves me time and effort" becomes possible and tempting, and experience shows people often do that. You might not but the fact that people do means that when AI use is obvious there will always be an amount of suspicion and lower trust.

Not enough detail. Show your template

A failure would usually come with other signs, e.g. smart errors, a disk being disabled which would come instantly. Array status is essentially a "summary".