bwestpha

Sure - sorry nas-diagnostics-20231026-1505.zip maybe not related, but if i see the logs directly after hitting a new vDisk size and starting Docker, I can see this message from the Logs window: Oct 26 15:14:37 WNAS root: Stopping Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD DNS Server Configuration Daemon: stopped Oct 26 15:14:37 WNAS root: Starting Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD DNS Server Configuration Daemon: /usr/sbin/avahi-dnsconfd -D Oct 26 15:14:37 WNAS avahi-dnsconfd[2777]: Successfully connected to Avahi daemon. Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS emhttpd: shcmd (650): /usr/local/sbin/mount_image '/mnt/user/system/docker/docker.img' /var/lib/docker 30 Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS kernel: loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 62914560 Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS root: mount: /var/lib/docker: mount(2) system call failed: File exists. Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS root: dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call. Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS root: mount error Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS kernel: BTRFS warning: duplicate device /dev/loop4 devid 1 generation 3484667 scanned by mount (2831) Oct 26 15:14:38 WNAS emhttpd: shcmd (650): exit status: 1 //deleting by old vDisk (backuped) and creating a new one seemed to work. but this would mean loose all my containers and i would have to re-create them, right?

Hi there, i have a quite similar problem to this thread here: My docker img file seems to be out of space (no idea why exactly) - and therefore my docker service will not start. I already tried to stop the service from web gui, (or just set it to stop since it was already down) and change the vDisk size to 50GB instead of 20. But basically nothing happend -the disk was not resized and the docker daemon was not able to start again . any way i can fix this without re-creating all docker containers again as stated in above solution?

Totally agreed!

Hey guys, currently I have the following issue / setup: I have a Chenbro RM41416 case with 5x16TB, 1x 10TB, and 2 SSDs in it. As I started with my build (and still) the WifeAcceptanceFactor is a huge thing... So I decided to exchange the standard redundant PSU (which was loud as hell) with a customer PSU, which does absolutly fine. I also exchanged the clip-in coolers (4x 80mm) right behind the backplane with 3x Noctua 120mm fans to keep the case silent and kind a cool. To be honest, this didn't really worked out well. In my opinion the fans are too far away from the actual HDDs and have not enough pressure to prevent the disks from heating up. The chassis itself is really heavy and I'm not really happy with the current state. So my next idea would be to switch back to a pretty large customer case - the Fractal Design 7 XL case. This would offer me to place fans right in front of the disks and place even more large fans to pull out the air on the back, top , and bottom if needed. (it has some more benefits like getting rid of old backplates and this legacy-proprietary Chenbro stuff, or not needing so many custom adaptions since im using mostly consumer hardware etc) My question now is: How problematic will it be to just replace the case - but with that, the backplate and the connection to the mainboard. Now: The SAS connector from my Supermirco X11SSH-CTF is going directly to the SAS backplate of the Chenbro and there the Disks are connected via SATA to that backplate. When switching to the Fractal, I would assume that I will connect some of the disks directly to the SATA ports of the mainboard and some of them have to go thru the SAS port again as well. First: Is this enough to replace the backplate ? Second: At this point the backplate handles the power management of the disks via 1 molex connector to each row (4HDDs), is it also enough to get one of these: Is there propably any better way to handle this connection stuff ? Third: Does Unraid have some pitfalls here? (Any other doubts if this will help a little in cooling and organizing this build ? ) Thanks Ben

IMHO there is something wrong when calculating speeds and showing them in the frontend: Here an example from my home: In this case, it seems like decimal point is somehow shifted. Upload is correct, but download is far away from real values. I have a 1gig download stream and when testing directly via speedtest.net, i always get around my 1100 Mbit/s. This is very similar to the values in the frontend, but the comma is in the wrong place // And as a suggestion: You should add a hint on WHAT exactly you need for a "speedtest.net server" metric, IP adress? Hostname? or an server ID from an XML file hosted here: https://c.speedtest.net/speedtest-servers-static.php . For all others: It's the XML file and the 'id' attribute in it.