Brad McConnell

I view that as a more intrusive option to someone's time compared to simply hitting an "x" on a banner message. I'm operating on an assumption that the greeting is sent with the same mechanism as the update notifications. Since this is a community driven project, if you'd like to see the subscription or opt-in/out methodology, maybe submit either as a feature request or possibly look at the source and see if there's a mechanism that could be leveraged or write a module and provide it back to the community. Since it's a minor action to click the close "x", in my opinion, I don't think it would justify the lines of code to enable/disable notifications based on say "holiday" criteria vs. update notifications.

I think there are other things to worry about rather than being upset because someone says "Happy New Year"

Can we please get a vetting mechanism for applications within CA? It's getting just absolutely silly checking new apps. Repackaged apps with no value to unRAID, nothing even tested with unRAID templates. CA is turning into a RSS feed for dockerhub, and has lost relevance to unRAID.

20 apps later by someone that's spamming the repository... we need a check/balance mechanism. The apps are even being flagged as dead projects. Someone is just fluffing their numbers and it's making it difficult to find decent new apps to add.

How hard would it be to code a thumbs up/thumbs down or rating feedback mechanism the entries/applications. Lately CA seems to be flooded with certain contributors effectively uploading pretty much generic Dockerfile configurations, and no reputable support links to other than projects Github project (without Unraid specifics) and it's making it difficult to discover new apps to add without weeding through the effectively default configurations that don't tend to work OOB.

My apologies - I did type it with correct capitalization, but since we're on the old way of doing things, it capitalized the entire subject line.

I think the subject line says it all. You may have your fans, but you guys really SUCK at running a forum. There were script kiddies from the 90's that managed things better than this. Is it really that hard to index active support articles at the top?

Just hit the limit myself and missed the fine print of the 28+2 and annoyed with the "unlimited" statement that isn't true - I have a disk shelf with room for another 13 drives. I can shuffle around and repurpose hardware, but I wasn't expecting to.

Perfect! Thank you.

Thank you - how in the world is this not a default? That resolved the width issue. Regarding "Home" fair enough - I just have to adjust muscle memory to not look for the same categories on the left hand pane. Noted, and saw that previously. I understand the simplicity side of the UI, but at the same time - the App stores tend to be a bit more descriptive than 3 letter acronyms for some obscure open source project that may be world changing. I liked being able to see a highlight of the description beyond the dev and the repository. For instance, using the Home as an example, Spotlight Apps have up to two lines of description. My opinion - Top Trending and Top New Installs should show that same snippet of information. Thank you for your time!

On the old system, I didn't have to go into each category to see. I may be using the wrong terminology/phrasing but before I believe there was a new apps section and a trending apps section (regardless of category) and that's what I'm trying to reference. Regardless of browser width, I don't seem to get more than 4 across (even maximizing a browser on a 4k display). Looks like by default I get 18 per screen without paging.

Agreed, UI redesign is not at all friendly. Removal of the trending apps and new, newly released kind of takes away the benefit of using the CA plugin.