uldise
-
Posts
962 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by uldise
-
-
46 minutes ago, Taddeusz said:
Are you running on Unraid?
Yes.. long time already, with a few dockers..
-
@Taddeuszany hints, what to do next?
-
22 minutes ago, Taddeusz said:
Yes, that’s correct.
just did that - 1.4.0-3 is working just fine. then i upgraded to latest - and it's not working - looks like mariadb is not running at all.
catalina log snippet below. if i open docker log, it's full of mariadb restarting every one second...
19:11:38.010 [http-nio-8080-exec-5] WARN o.a.g.e.AuthenticationProviderFacade - The "mysql" authentication provider has encountered an internal error which will halt the authentication process. If this is u 19:11:38.014 [http-nio-8080-exec-5] ERROR o.a.g.rest.RESTExceptionMapper - Unexpected internal error:. ### Error querying database. Cause: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server. ### The error may exist in org/apache/guacamole/auth/jdbc/user/UserMapper.xml ### The error may involve org.apache.guacamole.auth.jdbc.user.UserMapper.selectOne ### The error occurred while executing a query ### Cause: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
and mariadb.log is full of this:
/usr/bin/mysqld: One can only use the --user switch if running as root
-
2 minutes ago, Taddeusz said:
It shows the version number in the lower right corner of the login screen.
so small i'm currently on 1.3.0, so l must upgrade to 1.4.0-3, then i can upgrade on latest. is docker tag number 1.4.0-3 ?
-
sorry for stupid question, but how i can get version number of currently running guacamole? i simply won't update very frequently and just saw red warning on first page..
-
1 hour ago, chris_netsmart said:
I would like to confirm that the following devices are not up to the job
i'm not sure about your question - if you add LSI card, then you will see group number. if it on it's own group then you should pass it to the VM.
-
On 10/30/2022 at 10:55 AM, chris_netsmart said:
is that Unraid see them as Vm Hard disks and not a physical hard drive.
that's true - if you have such config, forget about SMART monitoring, disk spindown..
you must pass-through whole disk controller to get these features working.
On 10/30/2022 at 10:55 AM, chris_netsmart said:I did try and pass through a PCI controller but this just course unraid and proxmox to crash
look at IOMMU group of you controller - if there are many devices in same group, you are in trouble. as per your pic, i see group "11" more than once.
if you pass this one device, then all others in this group will be inaccessible to Host.
there are some options to split PCIe devices to each own group, but it depends on you motherboard used.
-
9 hours ago, chris_netsmart said:
or does plopkexec just act like a boot OS, and as I have pass through my USB drive then it will automatic see this and start my unraid server - as if it was still on a bare metal
this.
-
7 hours ago, crash987_9 said:
Are there any nay benefits to having proxmox running on the metal with everything in a VM, or is it better to just run unraid on the metal and setup VM computers inside unraid
it depends..
if you have to restart unraid, then all your VMs/containers will do the same..
i'm running unraid on top of Proxmox, and it runs just fine - for me Proxmox is with more options cos it's pure debian. so on Proxmox VMs/LXC, while on unraid storage and Docker.
if you run unraid as VM it's recoomended that you pass-through all needed devices to VM.. look at your hardware for this option..
-
simply try safe mode, then remove incompatible plugin as requested..
-
IMPORTANT: Activation Code redemptions cannot be processed until 11/30/2021 at 12:01 AM PST.
- 1
-
it depends. look at Noctua as example. 120mm fans have more static pressure than 80mm.. comparison between various types of fans: https://noctua.at/en/nf-a12x25-performance-comparison-to-nf-f12-and-nf-s12a
-
35 minutes ago, whipdancer said:
Usable PCIE lanes?
Yes, AMD Epyc have 128 PCIe links for one CPU, but Intel 64.
i'm not about platinium or any other high-end CPUs..
-
i just noticed, that this strange Icons are only on Compact layout. if i turn it off, then images are just fine.
-
1 hour ago, JonathanM said:
No, but it's the same on two physically different machines.
the same for me. Chrome browser on Ubuntu.
-
17 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
these results are after updating the expander to latest firmware
how you update the firmware? do you need any special hardware to do that?
i think i got the same expander as you from link you posted on great deals, but i still had not a chance to test it.
-
it's a two different generation boards.. i recommend go for H12, and Rome or Milan CPU..
-
Container paths is wrong, see here: https://hub.docker.com/r/uldiseihenbergs/meshcentral
-
On 6/6/2021 at 4:19 AM, tjustice86 said:
I don't see any files under my meshcentral-data folder unless I check from within the container itself.
then it's something wrong with volume mapping. all config files should be accessible by host in mapped folder.
-
i will as you again - are your network 1Gbit?
and you can run iperf3 on Esxi host too, see here: https://williamlam.com/2016/03/quick-tip-iperf-now-available-on-esxi.html
-
@1da are your network 1Gbe? if yes, then ~200Mbit is really crap speed.. when i was on ESXi, and now on proxmox, i'm getting > 9Gbit on 10Gbit network - all default settings with one virtual nic with VMXnet3 Adapter type.
so, looks like you need to resolve your network problems first...
-
remove your NIC bound's at all and set MTU back to default, and test it with iperf3, to see that network is not a bottleneck..
-
9 hours ago, Ford Prefect said:
this is a set from a reputable Seller from DE: Link
Thanks for that. i need a dual port one, and found one on serverschmiede.com
-
i'm interested in this too, but from Europe
[Support] jasonbean - Apache Guacamole
in Docker Containers
Posted · Edited by uldise
typos
OK, looks like i somehow fixed it myself. what i did (just for reference) :
1. there was a problem with my reverse proxy config, looks like it changed with this version.
old version that works till version 1.4:
new version, works with version 1.5:
2. after upgrading to 1.5 this time mysql started just fine, but there was an errors in mysql.log:
2023-05-05 20:45:18 0 [ERROR] Incorrect definition of table mysql.event: expected column 'definer' at position 3 to have type varchar(, found type char(141). 2023-05-05 20:45:18 0 [ERROR] Incorrect definition of table mysql.event: expected column 'sql_mode' at position 14 to have type set('REAL_AS_FLOAT','PIPES_AS_CONCAT','ANSI_QUOTES','IGNORE_SPACE','IGNORE_BAD 2023-05-05 20:45:18 0 [ERROR] mysqld: Event Scheduler: An error occurred when initializing system tables. Disabling the Event Scheduler.
after quick googling i found that it should be fixed with this command inside docker container:
mariadb-upgrade -u root -p
BUT, this command was not found in docker image used, so i installed it myself with command (again, inside docker container) :
apk add mariadb-server-utils
and executed mariadb-upgrade command above and it fixed my mysql installation.
looks like all is working just fine now, quick docker restart shows no more errors in mysql.log.