landS

USD $350.00 + shipping (OBO) SOLD 1 Unused Norco 4224 with mounted: 1 120MM center plate 3 unused 120mm NF-P12 Noctua fans 2 unused 80mm NF-R8 Noctua fans Purchased in August 2012. Opened to mount the fans, center plate, and felt tape. Side panel marked with permanent marker saying Norco 4224 KEMPER. This has sat unused in my closet since then. I had planned on placing a virtualized Windows server into this machine – this will not happen anytime in the near future. I did NOT retain the original shipping box. I paid $395 for the case, 48.49 for the shipping, 11 for the 120mm fan plate, 19.98 for each 120mm fan, and 14.85 for each 80mm fan - A grand total of about $550. Item(s) Located and Shipped from NW Indiana, USA. No International Shipping. Local pick-up/exchange offered. Paypal accepted (Cash if local pickup OK). Buyer is responsible for paypal fees and shipping costs – UPS or FEDEX are preferred. I have sold a number of items on Tomshardware under the name Chris Kemper FYI - I seldom check PMs

http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=29670.0

I REALLY like the Q25 - this is just a little bit bigger than that, allows for LARGE air coolers and full sized graphic cards

Thanks Dirtysanchez. If no manufactures want to build it... I will likely make 2 of my own possibly using 3 3 in 2 or 2 5 in 3 iStarUSA hot swap racks. I have 2 fractal design cases, but these would be SO MUCH smaller.

What kind of interest exists in the community for the following? Sent to BitFenix, Lian-Li, Fractal Design, and Cooler Master on 11/27. My Fingers are crossed: I have an idea for a case that caters to both GAMING and NAS. In the same dimensions the BitFenix Prodigy you can fit 9 hot swappable 3.5 Hard drives with crossflow cooling utilizing a custom 140mm fan shroud, backplate, and air channel. The top conceals a slot loading optical drive. The PSU tray can be modified for easier wire management than the current gen BitFenix Prodigy. This gives just enough room to allow even the largest GPUs on the market to be installed. What would it take to see you place this on the market?

The BitFenix Prodigy has JUST enough room for the following: -Open up PSU endplate to allow for easier wire management -4 external 5.25 on the left hand side of the case (for 2 3 in 2 hot swap racks) -2 external 5.25 on the front (for another 2 in 3 hot swap) -1 front Noctua 140mm Intake -1 rear Noctua 140mm exhaust -A flat plate on the top .... OR -6 external 5.25 on the left hand side of the case (for 3 3 in 2 hot swap racks -2 front Noctua 120mm Intake Does anyone know of a case on the market like this today? (mITX, allows large PSUs, allows Great airflow and low noise, and has 9 hot swaps in a SMALL package) 1 difficulty - the hot swaps need the airflow to be perpendicular to most hot swap cages.

Test Parity Check Results 1 (P) + 3 + 4...Good 2 (P) + 1 + 2...Errors 3 (P) + 1.......Errors 4 (P) + 3.......Good 5 (2TB)+1.......Errors Found. Disk 1 (or its location on the Motherboard, or its cable, or its location in the ICYDOCK is BAD). Rather than instantly delegating the spot as bad - time for 1 more test where I place the parity drive into the DISK 1 bay. 4 (P) + 3.......Good - I hope Thanks for all the help everyone!

Just an update Test Parity Check Results 1 (P) + 3 + 4...Good 2 (P) + 1 + 2...Errors 3 (P) + 1.......Errors 4 (P) + 3.......Good 5 (2TB)+1.......In Progress (expecting Errors) If my expectations are met, Disk 1 will be trashed. It's location on the motherboard will be delegated to preclear tasks ONLY.

Stop Array Utilities/New Config Assign, start, parity Check Parity + Disk 3 + Disk 4 = ZERO errors post Parity Check (So Parity, 3, and 4 are all likely good) Stop Array Utilities/New Config Assign, start, parity Check Parity + Disk 1 + Disk 2 = ~1,800 errors and growing during Parity Check - at this point I stopped the parity check Stop Array Utilities/New Config Assign, start, parity Check Parity + Disk1 => Now Rebuilding Parity - Sync. Will run a parity check tomorrow am. Again - you have my many thanks!

oh dang, despite your clear instructions dgaschk, in my excitement i moved onto test 2 pre-parity check. I am checking the parity on disk 3+4 now. These disk's used % did NOT change post New Config Array start ---Thanks again Crew

First Run Results: Assign parity, disk1 and disk2 STARTED, 3 disks in array. Parity is Valid:. Last parity check 15911 days ago with no sync errors. HOWEVER - Disk 1 has gone from over 90% full to 1% ..... Onto the 2nd test Stopped array new config assigned Parity + disk 3 (as 1) + disk 4 (as 2) Start

Ah - that makes sense. Thank you!

Goggling 'unraid New Config Utility' returns very different results than 'unraid New Config' - I promise I was not being purposefully daft on this point. Just to confirm my understanding - this will kill the parity drive then rebuild the parity information when I start the array to the parity drive (with hopefully no data loss). Repeat these steps 3 or 4 times. What should I look for at the conclusion of each run? http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ ******** OR do you mean that I should say forget about saving the data and: run1 = parity + md2 + md3 +md4 ...if an issue, likely the parity drive problem ...if not an issue run 2: run2 = md1 (as parity) + md2 + md3 +md4 ...if an issue, likely the md1 drive problem what would runs 3 and 4 be? ******** OR something else entirely? Thanks again!

1 ram module - I ran memtest from 3pm to 9am with zero issues Do you happen to have a link to 'new config utility' ?

attached - thank you syslog-2013-07-23.txt

Moved to new thread during debugging: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=28652.0

As per the WIKI, I am here to seek advice MD1 = 1 corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree. 1 - what is the next step? 2 - a couple years back this same drive required a - reiserfsck --fix-fixable /dev/md1 3 - MANY parity runs with corrections have been run Additional info: Despite a UPS, after a mid-parity check power out, my production servers parity has not normalized. http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=28598.0 Steps Taken: 1 - Multiple Parity correction runs in different hardware configurations (all SMART and SYSLOGS look clean and good) 2 - Update from 4.6 to latest 5rc and redo 1 above 3 - Overnight memtest with no errors 4 - reiserfsck on 4 data disks MD2, MD3, and MD4: No Corruptions Found MD1 = 1 corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree.

bump - another parity check corrected 689 errors. thoughts?

Syslog Attached syslog.txt

- Pulled pre-cleared drive - powerdown & restart - reran parity with correction - Parity updated ~4000 times to address sync errors - powerdown & restart - reran parity with correction - removed all drives from ICYDOCK, used all new SATA cables, used a previously unused SATA cable that was hiding behind the MOBO tray - Parity updated ~5000 times to address sync errors - powerdown & restart - reran parity with correction - disconnected the ethernet cable - Parity updated 800 times to address sync errors - reconnect ethernet - powerdown & restart - reran parity with correction - after a few seconds, 15 corrections have taken place Syslog in next post ANY OTHER IDEAS?

'New permissions' Took about 3 days to run - all accessible now. Thanks crew

Frank1940 - thank you. This could be the issue... Ill kick it back off and leave the browser open overnight.

Well.. Now we can access BackupFolder and SOME of the subfolders.... very very strange.

Thanks dgaschk - sadly I am still struggling. I can add a new public share and access that with no issue from any of our computers but the BackupFolder which has always been accessible in the past is no longer. I am trying to run 'new permissions' again.

I can navigate via the network as the workgroup is tied out (TOWER\) and read write to Flash & Sub-folders Disk 1-4 When I navigate to BackupFolder (our Share name) either directly or via Disk1-4 I receive: Windows cannot access \\TOWER\BackupFolder You do not have permission to access \\TOWER\BackupFolder. Contact your network administrator to request access. The Share is setup under SMB, it is set to Export Public, Any Ideas? Thanks!