CyberIntellience

This is the solution! I was using firefox as thats my main browser. This time I rebooted using firefox but logged in using Google Chrome. I was able to start array successfully. Now the question remains is why?

So i had a power outage last night. Turned on unraid box and tried to start array. It was trying to do a parity check but around 19% it started saying stale configuration. I decided to reboot using unraid GUI. I tried to start array again but got "stale configuration", didn't even bother with parity check. My unraid box is hooked up to a surge protector and power outage happened in the middle of the night, only minor background usage was going on from docker containers. It seems like docker containers are up, I can access some of them (the ones with web GUIs). What should I do? I did a quick search and saw that usually when this came up there were missing disks, I don't have that problem. Disks look fine in unraid (nothing shows up in red, no disks missing or out of order). In terms of errors the only ones I saw in system log are: - kernel: serial 0000:00:16.3: Couldn't register serial port f0e0, irq 19, type 0, error -28 - kernel: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT4._GTF.DSSP], AE_NOT_FOUND (20220331/psargs-330) Unraid version: 6.11.5

I did make a basic sanity online search as well as going through all the advanced settings page for my router/modem combo. Sadly nothing stood out. I feel like I now understand why the kubernetes team gave up on dockershim and no longer support docker. Docker's networking features are limited and "not great". Its fine for developer workstations and small scale isolated deployments (don't need to depend on non-docker deployed services), its not so good for more serious deployments. Docker mostly just gets in the way. The main good part about docker is building apps, push docker images to dockerhub(s), and finding pre-built images (on dockerhub) is easy. I've been using docker regularly since about 2014 at work. I use LXC containers in proxmox and you can have as many network interfaces as you want attached to a single container. The annoying part of LXC is there is no real ecosystem of pre-built and well-tested images like there is for docker...

Thanks. Looking at the instructions of "complex networks" it looks like I cannot use this wireguard plugin. There is a step that is specifically for configuring static routes on your router. There are instructions for pfsense (its nice these are included). Sadly I am using consumer grade, ISP provided hardware and cannot switch over to my own hardware at this time. As far as I could tell there was no option to configure static routes in it. Previously I used to have OPNSense back when I had a reliable WiFi AP, I used the built-in wireguard plugin for VPN which worked pretty well. I think I will try to spin up a VM or LXC container on another box with wireguard on it. Maybe I'll also move over pi-hole DNS server as well.

honestly no idea, I must have just been trying random things before I figured out that wireguard was just not working at all (i didn't even realize at first it was in the inactive state). I changed this and it appears to be working now. Although I'm not sure if this was the fix or the fact that I disabled access to macvlan in docker settings. I'll try re-enabling this docker feature and see if things break. Now just need to figure out how to configure clients correctly so they have access to entire LAN. Seems access to pihole running on unraid (but with IPv4 from home router) isn't working just yet.

These steps did not work for me. I'm currently using Unraid version 6.11.5. The network change I made was to my static ip, I switched it to a new one and after saving changes moved it back. For wireguard the change I made was to the port used, i then changed it back. To confirm there was nothing weird going on, after the first failure I restarted the entire unraid box. wg-quick up wg0 [#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard [#] wg setconf wg0 /dev/fd/63 Warning: AllowedIP has nonzero host part: 192.168.1.1/24 [#] ip -4 address add 10.253.0.1 dev wg0 [#] ip link set mtu 1420 up dev wg0 [#] ip -4 route add 10.253.0.3/32 dev wg0 [#] ip -4 route add 192.168.1.0/24 dev wg0 RTNETLINK answers: File exists [#] ip link delete dev wg0 wg-quick down wg0 wg-quick: `wg0' is not a WireGuard interface