Jump to content

theone

Community Developer
  • Posts

    1,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by theone

  1. I also have the latest Preclear Plugin 2016.03.22 and only have single icon in Settings page under User Utilities.

     

    In addition when I open it I have an option to clear my 2nd Cache Drive (I am using 2 cache drives BTRFS).

     

    Shouldn't this NOT be listed ? It can f*ck up my data on the cache drive.

     

     

     

  2. After reading Intel® C222 Express PCH datasheet, it seems that the xHCI controller supports 14 USB 2.0 ports of which 6 can be USB 3.0 (In addtion there are 2 EHCI controllers).

    See section 5.21 of http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/8-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.pdf

     

    I am now thinking that SuperMicro connected all USB ports (2.0 and 3.0) to the xHCI controller - meaning that it cannot be passed-through as a whole.  >:(:(

     

  3. I ran readlink on all usb devices

    Tower login: root
    Linux 4.1.17-unRAID.
    root@Tower:~# readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1
    ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1
    root@Tower:~#  readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2
    ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb2
    root@Tower:~#  readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb3
    ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3
    root@Tower:~#  readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb4
    ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/usb4
    root@Tower:~#
    

     

    It seems that USB1 and USB2 are on the same PCI device 00:14.0 although one is USB2.0 and the other is USB 3.0.

     

    If so what are the other 2 USB devices (3 and 4)?

     

  4. With some flash drives attached, please sun this:

     

    echo "unRAID - > " $(udevadm info -q path -n /dev/disk/by-label/UNRAID |grep -Po '0000:\K\w{2}:\w{2}\.\w{1}' )
    for d in /dev/disk/by-id/usb-*; do echo "$d -> " $(udevadm info -q path -n $d |grep -Po '0000:\K\w{2}:\w{2}\.\w{1}')|column -t ; done

     

    See if any device is on a different PCI bus.

    I will do it later on today when I get back home and post back.

     

    BobPhoenix,

    That is what is puzzling... all ports (internal USB 3.0, internal USB 2.0, external USB 2.0) are reporting back the same BUS 001 !

     

  5. Has anyone done the mapping on a Supermicro X10SLL-F board?

     

    lspci

    00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI (rev 05)
    00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #2 (rev 05)
    00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #1 (rev 05)
    

     

    lsusb

    Bus 004 Device 002: ID 8087:8000 Intel Corp.
    Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 003 Device 002: ID 8087:8008 Intel Corp.
    Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
    Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0557:2419 ATEN International Co., Ltd
    Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0000:0001
    Bus 001 Device 004: ID 051d:0002 American Power Conversion Uninterruptible Power Supply
    Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13fe:3100 Kingston Technology Company Inc. 2/4 GB stick
    Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    

     

    The board has:

    * 4 external USB 2.0 ports

    * 1 internal USB 3.0 port (type A)

    * 1 port internal usb 3.0 header

    * 2 port internal usb 2.0 header.

     

    When connecting a USB device (DOK) to the external USB 2.0 ports I get them all on BUS 001 but my boot disk which is connected to the internal USB 3.0 port is also on BUS 001.

     

    I do not have internal cables to USB headers so can't test all other ports.

     

    How can both USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 reside on the same controller?

     

    edit:

    I found and added an internal USB 2.0 header and still the test DOK is shown as USB 001 !!!

     

    Are all the motherboards' USB ports connected to the same controller?!

     

  6. Thx it worked ... but is it really necessary to install another web server? is for the unraid gui already a server?

     

    but i works now, and really good compared with the builtin qemu stuff.

     

    Cheers

     

    Just remember not to upgrade unRAID to a new version if it has a new kernel until I release/compile a new VirtualBox package, otherwise you will be still without VirtualBox until I do.

     

  7. Had some issues with my cache drive yesterday and ended up reformatting it. Now when I try to start the swap I get "swapon failed: Invalid argument". I am creating the swap on /mnt/cache as recommended and I didn't have any issues with the plugin until I reformatted the cache drive.

    Any ideas?

     

    Tried to do it manually via SSH and encountered the same error:

     

    root@VOID:~# swapon -v /mnt/cache/swapfile

    swapon on /mnt/cache/swapfile

    swapon: /mnt/cache/swapfile: found swap signature: version 1, page-size 4, same byte order

    swapon: /mnt/cache/swapfile: pagesize=4096, swapsize=4294967296, devsize=4294967296

    swapon: /mnt/cache/swapfile: swapon failed: Invalid argument

     

    Try running swapoff on this swapfile and then swapon again.

     

  8. Thanks for the headsup. So i take it this fixes the Dynamix web interface going down?

    http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=44637.msg442500#msg442500

     

    I cant use virtualbox plugin without crashing the webinterface..

    I have been running virtualbox for the past few 5 years (at least) and have not had it crash the webUI. I did have segfaults due to lack of memory.

    I am not running any Dockers.

     

    Your problem seems to be reappearing in the forum and might be due to docker issues.

     

    do you get the problem when running without Virtualbox?

    do you get the problem when running without Dockers?

     

×
×
  • Create New...