-
-
Frage zum Ugreen NAS DXP4800 Plus mit Intel Pentium Gold 8505
Nach einigem Suchen schließlich die Option CTRL-F1 gefunden, die ins erweiterte BIOS führt. Leider auch hier nur einige Einstellungen zu den C-States und nichts zu ASPM. Hast du die o.g. Einstellungen von einer 4800+? Eventuell gibt es doch FW-Unterschiede...
-
Frage zum Ugreen NAS DXP4800 Plus mit Intel Pentium Gold 8505
Komme ich, ist nur etwas nervig, da im Keller verbaut. Im BIOS gibt es nur leider quasi keine Einstellungen zu den C-States, alles was dort ist, ist C5 im Power-Tab und das war bereits aktiviert. Habe ich eventuell eine ältere Firmware? Hier: 16.1.27.2167.
-
Frage zum Ugreen NAS DXP4800 Plus mit Intel Pentium Gold 8505
Bisher noch kein powertop, vielleicht wegen früherer schlechter Erfahrungen. Ist aber auch 10+ Jahre her... Lohnt sich denn auto-tune und ist es akzeptabel gefahrlos? Hier die Ergebnisse vom lspci, wovon hättest du denn gerne Screenshots? 00:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 12th Gen Core Processor PCI Express x4 Controller #0 (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) LnkCap: Port #5, Speed 16GT/s, Width x4, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk- 00:06.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 12th Gen Core Processor PCI Express x4 Controller #2 (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) LnkCap: Port #5, Speed 16GT/s, Width x4, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 51b8 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) LnkCap: Port #1, Speed 8GT/s, Width x2, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Alder Lake PCI Express x4 Root Port #5 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) LnkCap: Port #5, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 00:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Alder Lake PCI Express Root Port #9 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) LnkCap: Port #9, Speed 8GT/s, Width x2, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L1 <64us LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Aquantia Corp. AQtion AQC113 NBase-T/IEEE 802.3an Ethernet Controller [Antigua 10G] (rev 03) LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 16GT/s, Width x4, ASPM not supported LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 04:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Phison Electronics Corporation PS5013-E13 PCIe3 NVMe Controller (DRAM-less) (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) LnkCap: Port #1, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L1 unlimited LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ 05:00.0 SATA controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1164 Serial ATA AHCI Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0]) LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x2, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <4us, L1 <64us LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+ Powertop:
-
Frage zum Ugreen NAS DXP4800 Plus mit Intel Pentium Gold 8505
Wie ist denn euer Stromverbrauch so mit der DXP4800+? Habe das gleiche System hier mit Unraid laufen und mit drei 16TB-Platten immerhin ~50-60W, selbst im Spindown. Als Alternative hatte ich jetzt einmal das Aoostar WRT Pro mit Ryzen-CPU ausgemacht, das immerhin laut Test ~25W bei Idle verbraucht, immerhin ca. 100€ Unterschied pro Jahr.
-
[Plugin] unbalanced
Thanks for the info, juggling it will be then... As for the reasons, I tried unraid after ditching a Synology NAS (very good software, weak hardware) and a SFF PC for an all-in-one solution on a Ugreen 4800+ NAS. At first I thought, unraid would be good but there were several issues (mostly docker & compose related, clunkyness with compose, a docker apparently writing to rootfs despite not being mounted there, leading to complete unresponsiveness) that led me to believe TrueNAS could be better. Probably, in a few months/years/days I will think, "man, this unraid looks slick, if only TrueNAS would not be such a stickler with its ZFS volumes...".
-
[Plugin] unbalanced
Ok, that I could have done before. 🙂 I'd like to migrate away from unraid and I planned on having a backup of the important files (personal photos, documents, ebooks, etc.) on disk1 and the recoverable files (music, videos, etc.) on disk2, so that I can temporarily remove one disk after the other from unraid to the new system. I have the important files backed up as during this period they would not be parity protected.
-
[Plugin] unbalanced
Just checking if this is the right thing for the task at hand: I have three disks @16TB each (one of them parity) and would like to have my files sorted by folder into disk1 & disk2 (e.g. folder A is only on disk1, folder B only on disk2) to prepare for a data migration. Would that be possible, even if folder A is bigger than the total free space on disk1 (but not bigger than total space), e.g. could the plugin move data around to free space so that folder A fits onto drive1?
-
Dynamix File Manager
Love the file manager and it saved me tons of tedious work so far, but one thing that would be great if (especially for longer operations) if not only a percentage and remaining time (which both are often/always wildly off) are shown but also "x of y GB transferred" and/or "x of y files transferred".