-
dAigo started following [6.8.2] nested Hyper-V not working
-
[6.8.2] nested Hyper-V not working
No issues in 6.7.2. Existing VMs (Server 2016) with hyper-v enabled won't boot after update -> stuck at TianoCore Logo Booting into recovery mode works, booting from a install DVD to load virtio drivers and modifiy the bcd works. Removing "hypervisorlaunchtype auto" from bcd makes the VM boot (but disables hyper-v) How to reproduce: (in my case, I hope its not just me ...) 1) new VM with Server 2016 Template 2) Install Server 2016/2019 3) enable hyper-v and reboot. It should either not reboot, boot into recovery or come back with a non working "VMbus" Device in Device manager. Testet with cpu paththrough (default) and cpu emulation (skylake-client), i440fx (default) and q35. Coreinfo.exe always shows vmx and ept present in windows. (see screenshot)) Tried to add vmx explicitly without any change, but as far as windows goes, its always enabled. <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/> Without kvm_intel active, the unraid-server notices it and says it should be enabled. # lsmod | grep kvm kvm_intel 196608 8 kvm 380928 1 kvm_intel I did not get the chance to test 6.8.0 and could not find a link/archive. I would test 6.8.0 to see if that qemu/libvirt version works. Installing hyper-v creates a "VMbus" device in windows, that is not working if you remove "hypervisorlaunchtype auto" from bcd. I think qemu also uses a "VMbus" device to make Windows VM compatibility easier. Maybe thats part of the "Hyper-V" option in the unraid templates? Have not tried other hypervisors or windows 10 hyper-v. As far as kernel options go, "iommu=pt" is a needed workaround for the cheap marvell controller. I'll try to to install the next server in english for better screenshots unraid-diagnostics-20200301-1112.zip
-
-
Unraid OS version 6.7 available
I did not follow Betas or RCs, but from the Post that was linked on page 1, it looks, those that were effected changed controllers. Disabling VTd is not an option for me, so it won't help. I am not saying it should or can be fixed, but a note that this has happened so some people may be helpful. And if you follow the link to the bugreport, it was changed to a specific controller. It matches my controller and not those that have no issues. summary: - amd_iommu conflict with Marvell Sata controller + amd_iommu conflict with Marvell 88SE9230 SATA Controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1810239 [1b4b:9230] 02:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9230 PCIe SATA 6Gb/s Controller (rev 11) Yes, I knew that before I tried it. I had no issues until 6.7.0. I don't mind, just feedback for those that might also have that exact model.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7 available
Same issue here, during boot it tried to access the drives but eventually gave up. Havent tried anythig that could change something, like a diffrent PCI-Slot or ACS override. Reroll worked. Agree on having a note in this thread or the release notes. It seems this is a known "potential" issue since RC and has not been fixed for those that are effected. IOMMU group 1: [8086:1901] 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (x16) (rev 07) [8086:1905] 00:01.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (x8) (rev 07) [1b4b:9230] 02:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9230 PCIe SATA 6Gb/s Controller (rev 11)
-
Unassigned Devices - Managing Disk Drives and Remote Shares Outside of The Unraid Array
First, I want to thank you for taking over or at least stepping in while gfjardim is inactive, much appeciated. Second, I would like to renew my feature request for adding NVMe support to this plugin. origial request & additional info He said he will look into it, maybe thats the reason he is absend, still looking maybe As I wrote, I suppose there would be some recoding/testing involved to resolve the missing /dev/disk/by-id issue, as it is used quite often in the code from what I can tell. Lime-Tech startet to look into support for nvme as cache devices, but even if/when that comes, you would not mix nvme with normal sata ssd in a cache-pool, so nvme outside of the array will still be a valid option I think. From what I can tell so far, apart from the naming issue that prevents it from beeing identified by the plugin every other tool/command (format/mount) should work as it does for a sata/ahci device. If you need more info about nvme, I explained the manual process of identifying an individual nvme device (at least in my case) HERE I would of course be willing to try inofficial releases and provide output/logs where needed.
dAigo
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited