Jump to content

JonathanM

Moderators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JonathanM

  1. 7 minutes ago, wgstarks said:

    This is one of the ones I got

    Ah, you said S02, so that's what I searched. How many total have you scraped? I'm almost 4,000K

    You can search with the string I posted to see if that's what you already tried.

    Try 3aa2514dffbff1e65dda107914a51557dd2f7326 for 03

  2. 1 minute ago, ghammer said:

    I have 128GB, 2 sticks are EXPO, and 2 are XMP but same speed and timing, so not sure if that matters. I will 2 first and go from there down to 1. Thanks!

    What speeds are you running? With 4 sticks the processor is only rated for 3600, regardless of the rated memory speed.

  3. 13 minutes ago, wgstarks said:

    Actually it looks like Sonarr is smarter than I am. Watched a few minutes of several episodes and they’re all the 2020 series anyway even though the torrent file said 1978.

    Is this what you got? 91e1975f6df6e48542f4921f045a6854621f1bc8

  4. Running Unraid as a guest is not officially supported. It's not forbidden, but any issues you encounter will need to be sorted out by collaboration with other like minded users, if you feel there is an issue with Unraid you will be asked to recreate that issue running baremetal before Limetech will look at it.

     

    With that in mind, I moved your post to the specific area on these forums where running Unraid as a guest is discussed. Hopefully someone familiar with your questions can help you out, and you can browse around to see what others have dealt with.

  5. 34 minutes ago, quietwalker said:

    So now the next question is: shoud I rebalance my nvme cache pool to "single mode", using the btrfs function to be able to remove one of my 2 nvme drives? Is that correct?

    No, single mode aggregates the space of the drives, interleaving writes where possible for speed.

     

    You need RAID1, where the drives are duplicated, so you can then remove 1 and still have your data.

  6. 6 hours ago, Tethgar said:

    This plugin is the biggest waste of time

    Currently the primary use of preclear is to stress test the drive.

     

    Many, many, many years ago when preclear was authored, adding a drive to the array kept you from fully starting and accessing the rest of the array until the clear operation was done. This was a total pain, meant that adding a drive kept you offline from all your data for potentially days. That was the reason for preclear, which was command line only.

     

    Now, adding a drive allows you to use the system normally for the entire process, and the new drive is available to format after the clear is done. This plugin can work to accelerate that, and allow formatting to be done almost immediately, but it's very sensitive, any writes to the cleared drive before it's added to the array will invalidate the preclear status, forcing the normal clear process to happen.

     

    So, yes, if something writes to the drive after the preclear is done before it's added to the array, the preclear time is "wasted", but the statistics about drive performance and any errors happen before you commit to putting the drive in the array, which means you should find out if the drive has issues before you put the rest of your data at risk by adding a failing drive to the array.

     

    I'd say that information is still valuable, regardless of whether you still have to wait several hours to format the drive.

  7. 1 hour ago, knights_of_pine said:

    i use appdata backup plugin to back up my containers appdata folders.

     

    i am getting the following error when it runs:

    image.png.5a7daf8c7ca75182d67fde46d3405e7e.png

     

    can someone help me correct this?  thank you!

    Pretty sure you just need to specify an exclusion for that path. It's out of the ordinary for the normal way of doing things, so it trips up the defaults in the backup plugin. It does not ever need to be backed up, it's simply a way for multiple separate binhex containers to share information.

  8. 52 minutes ago, MrCrispy said:

    Can you give more details on this

    I don't know the exact details, but some of the major things are a single partition starting at a specific offset, I think 64 or 2048, something like that.

    54 minutes ago, MrCrispy said:

    I just wasn't sure it would be writeable, support other disk operations on the file system - but you are saying it does, right?

    Yep. It's a standard linux layout, just more particular to accommodate the parity system.

     

  9. 1 minute ago, Zarroc said:

    the :100/tcp and :000/udp looks to be the container port from what i can see? Is that correct? If so for some reason when I go to edit that setting those two are greyed out. 

    Delete and recreate those two port entries, but with 55001 on both host and container.

  10. 44 minutes ago, Zarroc said:

    Is this what you need?

     -p '55001:100/tcp'
     -p '55001:000/udp'

     

    Those are wrong.

     

    They should look more like this

    -p '8080:8080/tcp'

    with the same numbers on both sides.

     

    If you select advanced mode on the template you should be able to find and correct them.