magmpzero

Hey all: I have been searching and reading a ton about timing of harvester/farming including bug reports / github issues with nas times. I am still a little unclear and was hoping someone would take a minute and help me understand it a bit better. Here is an example of my log: 2021-05-21T07:38:26.001 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 0 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.15400 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:38:35.406 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 2 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.67500 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:38:42.863 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 0 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.15500 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:38:50.154 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 0 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.16802 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:39:09.484 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 1 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 8.33100 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:39:15.320 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 1 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 7.28700 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:39:24.514 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 0 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.17500 s. Total 103 plots 2021-05-21T07:39:25.875 harvester chia.harvester.harvester: INFO 0 plots were eligible for farming 632e3571bf... Found 0 proofs. Time: 0.15203 s. Total 103 plots What concerns me is that sometimes when I have plot(s) pass a filter, the time goes up. For example, the first hit with 2 plots is good at .675000s but you can see a bit later I have 1 plot pass but time is 8.33100. I am guessing the time is going up because right now, I am farming on a machine with my plots share mounted via smb. Question 1: Am I correct in thinking this is all fine given that is still under 30sec but greater than 2? Question 2: Let's say I get lucky and one of my plots may have a proof. Does that full plot have to be transferred via the smb mount? I am pretty confident I can't transfer 100gb in under 30 sec with my network setup from the unraid array. I am really just trying to determine if I need to stop farming remotely given these times and just farm directly on the unraid server via a docker container. I know a bunch of us are off creating plots and storing them on our array, so just trying to figure out if we even have a chance at winning given the speed of unraid reads.

Everyone starts somewhere. In order to get any farmed XCH / Chia off of your wallet on unraid, you will need to create a new wallet somewhere and transfer your chia to it. For example, if you want to sell your farmed chia, you will need to transfer it to a wallet on an exchange that sells chia. I currently use gate.io as they support the ability to buy and sell chia.

This is great. I have it up and running now (well, syncing). I plan to use this just as my farmer and will not be doing many plots on unraid. I was previously farming on my windows computer via a smb mount of my plots. I think having farming local will help ease my concern of a long delay due to network etc. Quick question that I didn't see in the documentation, where is the syncing bloclchain stored? Is this outside the container so it will persist across updates etc? I am assuming it is being stored in appdata mount but just wanted to verify.

Yeah, I think it is a linux problem because I futzed around in the cli for a while. when fdisking or doing anything I kept getting errors / warnings about the GPT mismatch GPT PMBR size mismatch (4294967294 != 35156656127) will be corrected by write I reformatted multiple times on a real mac machine and tried several drives (I bought 4). I even tried creating new partitions under linux but could never get anything to work. Unfortunately, I can't do any further testing as I shucked the drive(s) and put them in my array.

I do. Just yesterday I plugged in a 8tb hfs+ external drive and was able to use without problem.

Great plugin! I use it all the time. Quick question: I bought a bunch of 18tb external drives for shucking but thought I would try to use one on my mac. Formatted normally and verified it was a good drive. Unassigned devices failed to work on such a large drive and would only show about 800gb free (if I remember right). Is this a known problem and is it a problem with linux hfs+ support or something to do with unassigned devices?