Jump to content

SphericalRedundancy

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SphericalRedundancy

  1. Unfortunately no I didn't, I kept having other issues as well so I migrated my files off of my unraid server and stopped using it.
  2. This still has not been fixed and its pretty ridiculous depending on the type of rules you want to use. Using something as simple as the rule below means you can only have 8 hosts per share without messing in the exports file. 192.168.10.5(sec=sys,rw,sync)
  3. I currently have 8 NFS shares that are all working as expected configured as a private NFS share but I noticed today when I attempted to add a 9th NFS share that although the entry gets added to the /etc/exports file it does not actually export the new share as shown by showmount or exportfs -v. I noticed that when I run exportfs -ra to re-initilize the NFS service and have it export shares configured in /etc/exports it shows an error message about incorrect syntax for a bad option list. This points to line 9 in the /etc/exports file but line 9 is a completely different share that is currently working normally and exported successfully. If I remove line 9 by disabling that share in the Unraid GUI, the syntax error just moves up one line but I don't see any issues with the content of /etc/exports and I wouldn't expect any errors considering I haven't manually edited the file. All entries in /etc/exports were added by Unraid itself. I've attached some other images below for reference, the NFS share that is not working as expected is /mnt/user/tv. Unraid share settings in GUI: Content of /etc/exports: # See exports(5) for a description. # This file contains a list of all directories exported to other computers. # It is used by rpc.nfsd and rpc.mountd. "/mnt/user/backups" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=102 192.168.1.10(sec=sys,rw,sync) "/mnt/user/comics" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=108 192.168.1.38(sec=sys,ro,sync) 192.168.1.33(sec=sys,ro,sync) 192.168.1.17(sec=sys,rw,sync) "/mnt/user/downloads" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=100 192.168.1.51(sec=sys,rw,sync) 192.168.1.52(sec=sys,rw,sync) 192.168.1.44(sec=sys,rw,sync) 192.168.1.27(sec=sys,rw,sync) 192.168.1.53(sec=sys,rw,sync) "/mnt/user/ebooks" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=109 192.168.1.38(sec=sys,ro,sync) "/mnt/user/instructional" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=110 192.168.1.38(sec=sys,ro,sync) "/mnt/user/movies" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=107 192.168.1.47(sec=sys,ro,sync) "/mnt/user/other" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=112 192.168.1.33(sec=sys,ro,sync) "/mnt/user/proxmox-isos" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=105 192.168.1.14(sec=sys,rw,sync),192.168.1.15(sec=sys,rw,sync) "/mnt/user/tv" -async,no_subtree_check,fsid=106 192.168.1.47(sec=sys,ro,sync) Output of exportfs -v Any help with be very much appreciated as I don't understand what is happening. Thank you,
  4. Yea it's on lan, was using chrome, same thing for firefox though.
  5. So I just did this and its all working great except that after I installed the red hat qxl display controller driver, the black border around my mouse cursor was removed. So when I mouse over the file explorer, or anything that's got a white background, I can't see my mouse at all. Anyone got any ideas?
  6. Is it normally so slow? It takes several seconds after clicking or typing for anything to happen.
  7. When there are updates for docker images and you run the update for all containers, if your time is off the docker pull/run command will fail because of a cert error but it will not display in the log shown, it'll show 0 bits pulled for the new image and rebuild the container using the existing image and show the update as successful even though no update has been applied.
×
×
  • Create New...