Spoir

Is that something that's configurable or visible somewhere? Or is that a limitation of a single link from the controller? I did some testing and it looks like the second shelf controller isn't even doing anything even if it's the only one connected, again I think this is just because I have SATA drives in there, but I wonder which side would be responsible for the limit. Ugh, I knew I should have leaned towards SAS drives. I'm leaning towards 2.4 GBps is the limit of a cable, 4 lanes that do ~600MB/s makes sense.

Hello all, is there a reason why I'm limited to 2 GB/s for this setup? Server is an R730 with 2x E5-2680 v4 "Problem" Controller is an LSI SAS9207-8e 8-Port External HBA and is on the far-right riser that also contains a x8 NIC. All drives are heavily used / refurbished HUH728080ALE604 contained in a DS4246 with an IOM6 controller connected via a QSFP SFF-8436 to SFF-8088 cable. DiskSpeed reads the following. Current Link Speed: (ok) width (ok) ( max throughput) Maximum Link Speed: 8GT/s width x8 (7.88 GB/s max throughput) Attempted to change tunables to over 4k with negative results. Reverted change to defaults. Connected both cables to disk shelf and rebooted, but since the drives aren't SAS I really wasn't expecting anything to change (and nothing did) Is there anything else I can look into? First image shows problem array Second image shows the onboard hba that services the R730's 2.5" drives as a comparison. Output of lspci -d 1000: -vv for the problem controller is also attached. LSPCI.txt

Hello all, is there a reason why I'm limited to 2 GB/s for this setup? R730, controller is an LSI SAS9207-8e 8-Port External HBA All drives are heavily used / refurbished HUH728080ALE604 contained in a DS4246 with an IOM6 controller connected via a QSFP SFF-8436 to SFF-8088 cable. DiskSpeed reads the following. Current Link Speed: (ok) width (ok) ( max throughput) Maximum Link Speed: 8GT/s width x8 (7.88 GB/s max throughput)

Hello all, I'm having a repeatable issue with my array where it will completely fill up one of the 9 data drives to 100% and then KEEP trying to write to it, primarily the mover. I've attached several screenshots and logs, but this has happened several times now. To resolve it I open up qdirstat and manually move files to a different drive using krusader. In the screenshots, you can see a sample of the shares settings, all which leave at least 10GB free, split level any, and use High-water allocation. The first time it happened it was disk 7, now it's disk 5 that is being filled up In terms of hardware, I have a Xeon E3-1270v2, Supermicro x9scl, 32GB Ram, 10hdds ranging from 2-8GB with 2 500GB SSD cache drives. Thanks for any help you can provide! spoirnas-diagnostics-20210130-0822.zip

unRaid was set as local master and I did have a little Yoda head the entire time. Even had it send alerts if anything failed. Still haven't pinpointed the issue yet, but the hosts file did the trick.

Unplugged from router, gave static IP to host. Added a binding in hosts to the tower and I can now access the shares with the username and password. Will investigate further. Seems to be a dns issue?

Hello all, I'm pretty new to unraid. I've spent the last 4 days researching and testing out my new system for a NAS + Gaming VM setup. I am having issues with private and secured shares on my Windows 10 VM. After exhaustive research, I have tried many things to get it running. So I'll state how I have it set up and what I've tried and hope someone has an answer. Shares: Music, Movies, UserFiles (Private) UserFiles has a user with read/write access and a very simple password (1234) Symptoms: Through file explorer, Windows VM can see and access both Music and Movies, but prompts for password for UserFiles to which it then fails (access denied). username: user, password: 1234 Laptop (W10 as well, same version) prompts for password when accessing \tower and is able to read/write in all directories (including UserFiles) Server2012 VM can access all directories, is prompted for credentials for UserFiles and can access files. Failed Attempts to resolve issue: Restarted both vm and unraid several times Created local user on W10 machine with matching name and password Created samba user with matching user to windows logon and password Cleared credential manager net use * /d (Even though nothing was listed) net use z: //tower/UserFiles \u:username Disabled SMB2 and SMB3 and restarted (and tried the other methods again) Changed workgroup on both ends to an all caps workgroup. Ensured Unraid was master browser Enabled the registry change to allow unauthorized access (can't remember the exact setting atm) Accessed shares with IP address: This actually works fine, but doesn't fix the issue of not being able to connect with hostname. So I can access the private shares using \\192.168.1.2\UserFiles but not \\tower\UserFiles Somewhere in my travels I lost the ability to have the shares populate in the network though This lead me to think I am having a DNS issue, but not one I'm familiar with. My router is a brand new Nighthawk R6900 on stock firmware. I would have thought that if it was a DNS issue that the other machines would be having the same problem, but they are not. Anybody have other avenues to try? I am currently at work so I may be slow to respond to attempts. Thanks!