Jump to content

jondak

Members
  • Content Count

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About jondak

  • Rank
    Member

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello, Maybe the uuid problems happened because perc h700 was in raid mode and the new card is in jbod mode. From what I found perc h700 doesn't have a true jbod mode. Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
  2. Try to enable smb1 in Windows 10 p https://www.windowscentral.com/how-access-files-network-devices-using-smbv1-windows-10 Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
  3. jondak

    Cant add share

    You are using 2 parity disks. They are not cumulative. https://wiki.unraid.net/Parity Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
  4. Thank you aptalca worked by pulling a older version: linuxserver/openvpn-as:2.6.1-ls11
  5. Was mostly interested about the secure erase function. Any importance about the version of this ?
  6. Hello, first of all some information about my setup: 2* 8 tb seagate ironwolf parity drives model ST8000VN0022 Controller: Dell Perc H310 SATA / SAS HBA Controller RAID 6Gbps PCIe x8 LSI 9240-8i M1015 flashed in IT mode ( the drivers are compatible Link HGST webcache ) Running Unraid Pro 6.6.2 I want to upgrade the 2 parity drives to 12 tb HGST / WD - Ultrastar DC HC520 (He12) without Power Disable Feature What i am uncleared about is the model number to get: 1. HUH721212ALE604 - 12 tb 7200 rpm sata 512e SE ( secure erase) 2. HUH721212ALE600 - 12 tb 7200 rpm sata 512e ISE ( instant secure erase) 3. HUH721212ALN600 - 12 tb 7200 rpm sata 4Kn ISE ( instant secure erase) I am leaning towards number 1 but i am intereset to know your input / experience regarding this models in Unraid Cheers.
  7. Enable disk shares > scan > disable. I use disk shares to keep my disks organised as I want it. Cheers. Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
  8. Hello, I use this to catalog my disks: https://www.whereisit-soft.com There is also https://www.wincatalog.com but I never used it but seems similar to whereisit. Cheers. Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
  9. Hello, i require some help editing a script to generate par2 files for the movie folders. I want to use it to protect my movies from bitrot or other errors. My case: \\unraid\diskXX\movies \720p \yearxx \movie \yearxy \movie \1080p \yearxx \movie \yearxy \movie \movies without subtitles \720p \yearxx \movie \yearxy \movie \1080p \yearxx \movie \yearxy \movie At the moment I am mounting each year as a map network drive using a cmd file which generates the par2 files in each movie folder. I open a command promt and use par.cmd x:\ (x being the network drive) The par2.cmd is as fallows: @ECHO OFF REM this command script requires Windows 2000/XP SETLOCAL REM check input path IF NOT EXIST "%1" ( ECHO The path does not exist. GOTO :EOF ) REM set options for PAR2 client SET par2_path=C:\Users\Jon\AppData\Local\MultiPar\par2j.exe REM SET par2_blocks=64 SET par2_redundancy=2.19 REM recursive search of sub folders PUSHD %1 FOR /D /R %%G IN (*.*) DO CALL :ProcessFolder "%%G" "%%~NG" POPD PAUSE GOTO :EOF REM create PAR2 files in each sub folders :ProcessFolder PUSHD %1 %par2_path% c -rr%par2_redundancy% -fo -rd2 -lr100 "%~2.par2" * POPD GOTO :EOF ENDLOCAL What I would like is to mount the "movies" and "movies without subtitles" folders as a map network drive and for the script to create in a drive called Y:\ the same folder structure and put the par2 files in each corresponding folder. The reason is with my current use it also write to parity when i generate the par2 files and when i move them to a separate disk outside of the array. Also if anyone use has better ideas i all for them. Thank you. par2.cmd
  10. I use on my pc a Raidsonic icy box IB-3620U3 http://www.raidsonic.de/products/external_cases/external_cases_35/index_en.php?we_objectID=481 I used in it 8 tb drives without isues. Don't know about 12 tb but they say it don't have limit. Cheers Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
  11. https://wiki.lime-technology.com/UnRAID_Manual_6 Search for virtio and there is the order. Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
  12. I have both of them in the array: 3 seagate ST8000VN0022 - 2 as parity , 1 as data 2 WD80EFZX - as data the seagates runs hotter (as they are 7200 rot) than the WD The preclear stats: WD80EFZX: Step 1 of 5 - Pre-read verification: [15:29:54 @ 143 MB/s] SUCCESS Step 2 of 5 - Zeroing the disk: [15:18:13 @ 145 MB/s] SUCCESS Step 3 of 5 - Writing unRAID's Preclear signature: SUCCESS Step 4 of 5 - Verifying unRAID's Preclear signature: SUCCESS Step 5 of 5 - Post-Read verification: [15:30:37 @ 143 MB/s] SUCCESS Ironwolf: # Step 1 of 5 - Pre-read verification: [11:42:02 @ 189 MB/s] SUCCESS # # Step 2 of 5 - Zeroing the disk: [11:30:07 @ 193 MB/s] SUCCESS # # Step 3 of 5 - Writing unRAID's Preclear signature: SUCCESS # # Step 4 of 5 - Verifying unRAID's Preclear signature: SUCCESS # # Step 5 of 5 - Post-Read verification: [11:40:35 @ 190 MB/s] SUCCESS # For now i had no problems. In Romania the Ironwolf are around 30 euros cheaper so was worth the buy,
  13. Seems i found the culprit in my case. After i restarted to get the webui back and disabled the Dynamix File Integrity Automatically protect new and modified files i had 2 days of transfers without problems. I even used File Integrity build without problems. This morning i activated Automatically protect new and modified files and the server crashed again with the out of memory error taking with it the samba service but i could restarted it from the CLI. My settings are after i disabled the the Automatically protect new and modified files again. My specs: M/B: Supermicro - X9SRL-F CPU: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Enabled Cache: 512 kB, 2048 kB, 20480 kB Memory: 32 GB (max. installable capacity 128 GB) Network: bond0: fault-tolerance (active-backup), mtu 1500 eth0: not connected eth1: 1000 Mb/s, full duplex, mtu 1500 Kernel: Linux 4.9.19-unRAID x86_64 OpenSSL: 1.0.2k Now samba works but copying files crashes after about 20% of a 6 gb file. I will restart once the preclear of a 3 tb disc completes.
  14. Thank you. I started again a test copy to the same disk. For now it works pretty good. I will wait and see if it completes the whole 235 gb or test copy. I have 32 gb ram. Last night i tried to enable the File Integrity automatically protect new files while running a preclear on another drive. I since disabled that setting and checking like this. LE; Still copying strong at 50 mb/s which is ok considering SMR. Seems the File integrity plugin ate all my memory and gave me a scare. After 70 gb or files copying i started a preclear to see if his the culprit. For not it seems ok.
  15. Hello, my starting array is 2 seagate ironwolf 8 tb as parity and 2 wd red 8 tb as data. I have used the array without a problem for 30 days now copying directly to the array without the need for cache drive in the middle with 60-80 mb/s. Some days ago i added i added a seagate ST8000AS0002 SMR drive which i precleared at about 140 mb/s. After the preclear ended successfully i added the drive as disk 3 to the array. when i started to copy directly to the array it copied about 30 gb then the speed droped to a crawl with the array and webui becoming iresponsive.After trying 3 times with the same results i have created a share on that drive only with the cache drive use on it, The speeds to the cache drive were 50-60 mb/s so i test copied 200 gb of test data then went to sleep letting the mover do its thing at the scheduled time. When i woke up this morning and checked the server the webui was unresponsive so i ssh-ed to it. When i use the mover command to see the status of the mover there were some bunch of errors on every single big file in the test. Some of the small folders were moved from the cache but the larger 8 gb + files were still there. I did a diagnostic from the command line which i attached, then /sbin/reboot to gracefully restart the server. I will do one more test on this drive and if unsuccessful will shrink the array and mount the drive as a Unassigned device and test that way. I may be that the write operations with the read necessarily for the parity is to much for this SMR Thank you for your help. jondak-diagnostics-20170404-0812.zip