eric.frederich

I just created a Win11 VM and trying to use WSL2 within it. It's my understanding WSL2 uses a real Linux kernel running under Hyper-V (whereas WSL1 was more of a translation layer; like the inverse of WINE). When I launch it, it seems to be working but I get this error in my terminal: wsl: Nested virtualization is not supported on this machine. It seems to be working under WSL 2 though. PS C:\Users\eric> wsl --list -v NAME STATE VERSION * ub24 Running 2 What do I need to do to get rid of this message? Things I've tried These were mainly from Google's Gemini AI. On the Unraid host I verified I got a 1 returned from cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/nested I've enabled Hyper-V on the Windows guest. On the Unraid VM xml I've added within <cpu> section: <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/> , then later switched vmx to svm I've added within <features> section: <kvm><hidden state='on'/></kvm> Verified that <cpu> had mode='host-passthrough' set. On the Windows VM I've created a .wslconfig file in my home directory with the following contents. [wsl2] nestedVirtualization=true

Thanks... not sure that makes me feel any better though ;-) Thankfully I'm getting a new NAS sometime soon (it's on a slow boat from China). Minisforum N5 NAS Pro with ECC RAM. Mayne this is something ECC RAM would have fixed?

I downloaded an Ubuntu iso file through a binhex-delugevpn app. The resulting download has a single bit flipped. Timeline: Since 2017, there have been 51 parity checks. Only one had any errors in 2017 after an unclean shutdown. All other parity checks have 0 errors. Aug 2nd: parity check (no errors) Aug 13th: iso downloaded via torrent Aug 19th: bit flip noticed after checking against sha256 sum, parity check initiated Aug 20th: parity check finished (no errors) I have resisted clicking "Force Recheck" on the torrent in the deluge UI because I suspect it will notice a bad chunk and correct it. I wanted to leave it in this broken state to come here and ask if there is something else I should try before doing so. Because there are no errors I should assume that this is not bit rot and maybe some other corruption occurred during various moving of the data? Deluge settings for that download: Download folder: /data/incomplete (/mnt/user/download - cache: yes) Move Completed folder: /isos (/mnt/user/isos - cache: yes) So my understanding would be: deluge downloaded the data into a cache enabled volume (/data/incomplete) deluge moved it to another cache enabled volume (/isos) Unraid's mover moved it from the cache to the array I'm not sure at what point deluge verified the torrent. Perhaps after download and before moving? Maybe it doesn't verify the entire checksum but just the chunks?... not sure. Is there anything else I should check? What do you suspect happened? Can I be fairly confident I have no bit rot because there were no parity check errors?

Posting the conversion from IRC in case anyone else is interested in the details or potential stop-gap workarounds.

Somone on Libera #unraid channel suggested changing over to `ghcr.io`. I tried this on my mariadb container. I edited it and set it to `ghcr.io/linuxserver/mariadb`. It pulled the image and started it. When I went to "check for updates" it still says "not available" even now after it's been set to `ghcr.io/linuxserver/mariadb` Would appreciate some help understanding what's going on here. Are there error logs to look at somewhere?

I'm in desperate need to replace my existing aging Unraid server. I'd prefer to go pre-built. Does this N5 or N5 Pro look like a good option? Currently I run mainly Plex, NextCloud, and a torrent client. I'd also like to run a VM or 2. It seems some tech influencers are excited about this but I'm not sure if it's genuine or not. https://nascompares.com/2025/01/08/minisforum-n5-pro-nas-revealed/

All 3 of my lscr.io containers have been saying "not available" when I check for updates. I used the terminal from the web UI to run `docker pull lscr.io/linuxserver/swag` as root and it pulled fine, so it's not a DNS issue. What could be the problem? Why just these 3 (swag, mariadb, nextcloud)? I'm on 6.10.3. I don't want to update right now as I plan on building a new NAS as soon as the Minisforum N5 comes out.

Almost a year ago (Oct 28th 2022), I got hit with some PHP version error. I changed my image to use a fixed tag (linuxserver/nextcloud:24.0.6) and have been using that fine ever since. I feel like I shouldn't be running a year old software though. Is it find to just change it to (linuxserver/nextcloud)... will it upgrade fine?

Just got a new laptop yesterday... what a dumb time for me to update this Docker image. I got hit with a PHP version error. Just changed my tag to "linuxserver/nextcloud:24.0.6" and thankfully it seems to have worked. I didn't get that message about mid-upgrade that someone else got.

I've been unable to download stuff, even things like Ubuntu iso torrents. It'll make some initial connections to a peer or two then nothing. I updated my openvpn config file and crt from IPVanish, nothing. I've used the same openvpn config file and crt in a qtorrentvpn container and it is able to download torrents. No idea what is going on.

Hi. I'm having difficulty running this on anything other than port 8080. The problem is that port 8080 is in use by another container of mine. I had to stop that container to even get this thing to start up. I have changed both Host Port 3 as well as the WEBUI_PORT and I cannot connect to the web ui. I am using the custom network proxynet (as shown in SpaceInvaderOne's YouTube videos) for running behind a SWAG (nginx) LetsEncrypt reverse proxy. Side node: the reason I'm trying this qtorrentvpn is becaues for some reason my deluge container stopped being able to download. I can't even download an Ubuntu ISO torrent. I updated my openvpn config files and crt files. No idea whats going on there. The same config files are working fine here on qtorrent. In my deluge container the torrents seem to start to download then immediately stop. They'll have a peer pop up then disappear.

Cool thanks for the reply. Maybe you can clarify something for me then. It's my understanding that: WireGuard is baked into the Linux kernel TailScale is built on top of WireGuard The Dynamix WireGuard plugin for UnRaid simply provides a web-ui to manage the WireGuard already baked into the kernel. Is all of that correct? If so, I'm curious how they don't conflict with each other.

I currently have WireGuard working with UnRaid via the Dynamix WireGuard plugin. What do I need to do if I want to try out this TailScale? Can both run at the same time or do I need to uninstall the WireGuard plugin? I only have two clients, so I don't care if they're lost.

Awesome work @HyperV thanks. It worked for me. Where is that code maintained? I wanted to see if it was fixed in a newer version of if we should file a bug. All I found was this which seems to be 5 years old and completely out of date. https://github.com/limetech/dynamix The DockerClient.php in that repo doesn't even have any Docker-Content-Digest.

I'm having this issue as well. I'm also on 6.8.3... I haven't updated my images in 2 months. Now every one of them is showing "not available". I hopped on #unraid IRC channel on FreeNode and asked there too. It's pretty quiet there, but the one person who did check was also having the issue... again on 6.8.3 I wouldn't assume it's a problem with this specific version until we hear from someone on a different release saying "it works for me". That hasn't happened yet.