Meph

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Meph

  1. Tried setting the things back.. after googling i found how to do it.. sysctl -w vm.dirty_ratio=20 sysctl -w vm.dirty_background_ratio=10 But this did not help... any more suggestions? i have no idea what happened.. Can i see somewhere what changes the plugin changed and then change it back? The system seems really slow, cannot really access the fileshares anymore.. i can login via SSH though.. no high cpu load and memory seems fine..
  2. humm.... i just tried this plugin... changed the vm.dirty_background_ratio to 5 and the vm.dirty_ratio to 80.. clicked apply and got presented with a black page... now i cannot access the web interface anymore... picture look like this... any tips how to restore to the default settings again?
  3. Found some forum posts about the same issue i had... turned out i had a logfile growing out of control. over 18GB ... i have now cleaned that file... everything sorted
  4. Thank you! I had the same issue here.. Did not know how this docker stuff does work. But I searched the same error message you had on google and found this article.. My docker image size were already at 20. Set it to 25 now and it started up! What is stored in that image file? and how do i access that data? hmmm i can see that my dockers (plex and resilio sync) writes to /mnt/user/appdata/ folder.. But that isnt the image file, is it?
  5. @Frank1940 Yes, I agree.. I would never use this disk with those many errors.. It's in the pile marked as "Defective" and is going to the recycling center next time im going there.. One thing is strange though. The report for this disc tried to upload as usual to the developer of the plugin, but upload failed. I tried like 3-4 times.. All other reports (like 10-15 reports) have reported just fine. This is the only report where the preclear plugin did not run to the end.
  6. Squid is the leader so far with 75027 hours for a Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB (5900rpm) SATA 3 (6Gb/s) disk! Thats 8.5 years in runtime!!! wow
  7. What is the oldest disk you are running/have seen in working condition in relation to S.M.A.R.T attribute number 9 = Power_On_Hours? I have a 300GB Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm (SATA) disk here with power on hours = 57711 .. Thats over 6,5 years in runtime! This disk has been running in a file server in a RAID5 setup (4disks) for quite some time. It has now been decommissioned by me.....
  8. Ok, this is the infamous Seagate 3TB disk.. I bought 4 of them and now 3 of them has failed... But they are old now.... 1 of the disks still tests fault free... But i will keep an eye on it.. Changed from QNAP to unRAID also because it offers more security in case QNAP hardware fail or the RAID5...
  9. Just of curiosity.. How could SMART report this disk as PASSED??? It failed the post-read verification and the disk does not look healthy at all.... Also the google forms failed to upload this report.. I let it sit for 5 minutes before i reloaded the webpage to get it to respond and then clicked dismiss. The next report that were ok were possible to upload fine in 2 secs.
  10. I can confirm this change works! This should be a setting that is made in unRAID when it is installed. Because default: allocation roundup size = 1048576 creates problems in shares when trying to copy files and reports wrong size used in Windows. I tried to copy 800GB of data to my unRAID server but got the message that the data would not fit even though i had 2TB free.. This made me find this thread... The correct setting should be: allocation roundup size = 4096 Setting this was a little unclear cause another guy talked about changing in a file on the USB... Here is the correct way to change it (It's often not explained in this forum i have noticed): In the unRAID web GUI (v6.3.5) click Settings -> SMB (under Network Services) then you add "allocation roundup size = 4096" (without the " ") in the text box "Samba extra configuration".. After that im not 100% sure if the settings will take effect or if you have to stop and then start the array.. I ended up with rebooting unraid after that it is working correctly! Finally! Maybe someone could report this as a bug (or change request)? Or I will when i get the time in a few weeks or so... Below you can see the that the allocation size has changed.. Size on disk: now shows 4KiB instead of 1MiB!
  11. The mode "most-free" does count the free GB and not how free the disk is %-wise i guess from testing... So for unRAID setups with disks with big size difference there will be a problem like this..
  12. Hello! I'm new here. I searched a lot for this and the different methods to fill up the disks. See the picture below. I would want disk 3-5 to recieve some data too. The High-water and Most-free goes after number of GB free on the disks i suppose after testing.. My problem is that it will take a long time for the other disks to fill up. There would be nice with a feature to fill them up %-wise.. Since users with disks with different sizes runs into this "problem" i have... I want to fill up the disks evenly in case the unRAID would fail due to 2 disk failures and i would also like them filled evenly because of disk wear... In the high-water case, and my screenshot below the disk3-5 would not start to fill up until disk 1-2 are 87,5% full...
  13. To let you know i'm a new user with unRAID. Installed it yesterday. Running on a HP Proliant DL380e Gen8 with 3,5" disks in front.. 8 slots.. (not 360e as i first though...)... Snatched a picture from internet.. it looks like this (ignore the red arrow and circle in the picture): Running with 1 CPU inside it and 32GB RAM.. Works great.. I need to fix 2 more HDD sledges since i only got 6 of total 8 Running old disks at the moment in it... 3 x 2TB and 3x 500GB.. Disks are SATA because they are cheaper... Controller supports SAS discs too i think.. When disks starts to fail i will replace them with 4TB disks probably... EDIT: Regarding the B320e controller inside it, i disabled it in BIOS and the HBA controller inside it takes over... Thats a hint for you guys trying to install with a RAID card...