Jump to content

CiaoCiao

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CiaoCiao

  1. I'm trying to setup my Nextcloud to work with Letsencrypt. (disclaimer : I am very new to this. Willing to learn but the learning curve seems a bit steep...)

     

    The problem I am facing is that I have forwarded the needed ports in my router and setup everything as explained in this video

     

    Yet, I cannot access my Nextcloud.

     

    In the logs of Letsencrypt, there is the following content

    Quote

    -------------------------------------
    _ ()
    | | ___ _ __
    | | / __| | | / \
    | | \__ \ | | | () |
    |_| |___/ |_| \__/


    Brought to you by linuxserver.io
    We gratefully accept donations at:
    https://www.linuxserver.io/donations/
    -------------------------------------
    GID/UID
    -------------------------------------

    User uid: 99
    User gid: 100
    -------------------------------------

    [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0.
    [cont-init.d] 20-config: executing...
    [cont-init.d] 20-config: exited 0.
    [cont-init.d] 30-keygen: executing...
    using keys found in /config/keys
    [cont-init.d] 30-keygen: exited 0.
    [cont-init.d] 50-config: executing...
    Variables set:
    PUID=99
    PGID=100
    TZ=America/Los_Angeles
    URL=*firstnamelastname*.net
    SUBDOMAINS=cloud
    EXTRA_DOMAINS=
    ONLY_SUBDOMAINS=false
    DHLEVEL=2048
    VALIDATION=http
    DNSPLUGIN=
    EMAIL=*myemailaddress*
    STAGING=

    Backwards compatibility check. . .
    No compatibility action needed
    2048 bit DH parameters present
    SUBDOMAINS entered, processing
    SUBDOMAINS entered, processing
    Sub-domains processed are: -d cloud.*firstnamelastname*.net
    E-mail address entered: *myemailaddress*
    http validation is selected
    Generating new certificate
    Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log
    Plugins selected: Authenticator standalone, Installer None
    Obtaining a new certificate
    Performing the following challenges:
    http-01 challenge for cloud.*firstnamelastname*.net
    http-01 challenge for *firstnamelastname*.net
    Waiting for verification...
    Cleaning up challenges
    Failed authorization procedure. mydomainname (http-01): urn:ietf:params:acme:error:unauthorized :: The client lacks sufficient authorization :: Invalid response from mydomainname/.well-known/acme-challenge/c5ExrCYBltBQXThW2cgXibAto8FKit42sn_IbvIctGk: "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
    <html>
    <head>
    <title></title>
    <meta name=", mydomainname (http-01): urn:ietf:params:acme:error:unauthorized :: The client lacks sufficient authorization :: Invalid response from mydomainname/.well-known/acme-challenge/KRzuKlcmy7Z0fHcfYMQgLVOr1F079Tp1OIXwxGX70fA: "<html xml:lang="fr-FR" lang="fr-FR">
    <head>
    <title qtlid="28806">F\xe9licitations ! Votre domaine a bien \xe9t\xe9 cr\xe9\xe9 chez OVH !</"
    IMPORTANT NOTES:
    Error in atexit._run_exitfuncs:
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/atexit.py", line 24, in _run_exitfuncs
    func(*targs, **kargs)
    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/certbot/util.py", line 665, in _atexit_call
    func(*args, **kwargs)
    File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/certbot/reporter.py", line 98, in print_messages
    next_wrapper.fill(line) for line in lines[1:]))
    UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe9' in position 600: ordinal not in range(128)
    Error in sys.exitfunc:
    An unexpected error occurred:
    - The following errors were reported by the server:
    UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe9' in position 600: ordinal not in range(128)
    Please see the logfiles in /var/log/letsencrypt for more details.
    ERROR: Cert does not exist! Please see the validation error above. The issue may be due to incorrect dns or port forwarding settings. Please fix your settings and recreate the container

     

    I've read different posts on different websites and I think I am supposed to add a file or folder somewhere but I didn't understand what and where (it was related to a folder named something along  "well-known acme")

     

    When trying to access nextcloud from outside the network, I am getting a timeout error.

     

    Could you please help me out? I'm having a hard time figuring out what this means and what I'm supposed to do to solve it. :( 

     

    Thank you in advance

  2. 2 minutes ago, johnnie.black said:

    Most likely the docker image.

     

    Set an appropriate (twice the large file you'll be copying) minimum free space for that share (share settings)

     

    You are right! :D 

    Apparently it's the Docker image that's filling all this space. How can I get it out of that disk? None of my Docker containers require fast storage and I'd rather have these 32 GB of cache than a super-fast loading drive monitoring Docker container ?

     

    I'll try to set my user shares properly then! Thank you! :) 

  3. Hello everyone :)

     

    I'm facing two issues with my unRAID cache SSD. It's a 32GB SSD I had bought to use as a cache-drive with Intel's SRT (or RST, I always mix them up) for my 2TB drive in my Windows computer.

     

    But now I'm trying to use it as a cache drive for my unRAID drive array and for some reason :

    1. it's already almost full at launch, before writing anything to the array :
      image.thumb.png.ba80cc7348bbb32d167d18659f71baa9.png

       
    2. Say I'd like to write large files to my array from my other computer. It will start writing at good speeds (thanks to the SSD) until it is full and the copying will simply stall, instead of going slowly at regular HDD write speeds.

     

    Any clue why it's acting like this?

  4. Hello everyone,

    I'm having a slightly different issue.

     

    When I access the community app library to browse it, it takes a VERY long time to load the first page (about 2 minutes). Alternatively, I get this error message :

     

    image.thumb.png.3154856779a3f22b3a1678b2331c6224.png

     

    This persisted when passing from 6.4.1 to 6.5 (stable)

     

    Switching to legacy mode didn't change a thing.

    Previously, it used to take only one or two seconds to load the same page.

  5. Hello everyone,

    I've seen a few (very) old topics including statements that a share size limit was under development.

    Yet, I have not found this feature in my new (and first) unRAID system.

     

    Time Machine is great because it is very simple to setup. But the problem is that it only overwrites old backups with new ones when there is not enough space left to write a new one without overwriting old ones.

     

    So this means it could potentially fill-up all the disks of the share.

     

    Of course you can setup a minimum free space but this is not really what I'm looking for since the disk is also used by other shares.

     

    How can I limit the size without having to plan on how I use the free space of the disk?

     

    Thank you :) 

  6. Hi @matthope,

     

    Thank you for your tutorial.

    I am very new to unRAID, to Linux too. I'm quite confused about my Syslinux file. Here is what mine looks like :

    default menu.c32
    menu title Lime Technology, Inc.
    prompt 0
    timeout 50
    label unRAID OS
      menu default
      kernel /bzimage
      append vfo-pci.ids=1912:0014 initrd=/bzroot
    label unRAID OS GUI Mode
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui
    label unRAID OS Safe Mode (no plugins, no GUI)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot unraidsafemode
    label unRAID OS GUI Safe Mode (no plugins)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui unraidsafemode
    label Memtest86+
      kernel /memtest

    Am I supposed to make it like this? It didn't boot when applied so I had to go back to the above. 

     

    default menu.c32
    menu title Lime Technology, Inc.
    prompt 0
    timeout 50
    label unRAID OS
      menu default
      kernel /bzimage
      append vfo-pci.ids=1912:0014 initrd=/bzroot
      append pcie_acs_override=downstream vfio-pci.ids=8086:a170 modprobe.blacklist=i2c_i801,i2c_smbus
    label unRAID OS GUI Mode
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui
    label unRAID OS Safe Mode (no plugins, no GUI)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot unraidsafemode
    label unRAID OS GUI Safe Mode (no plugins)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui unraidsafemode
    label Memtest86+
      kernel /memtest

    Thank you in advance! :) 

  7. Okay I might have found what was wrong.

     

    For some reason, I had not set the correct VirtIO driver folder location in the "VM Manager" settings. The iso did however show up when creating a VM which lead me to thinking that was fine. I had noticed that the interfces were set to IDE but for some reason changing them manually to SATA would (at that time) prevent me from booting the VM.

    I now have set the correct iso folder location in the VM Manager and now several things have changed :

    • when creating a VM the interface settings are already on "SATA"
    • The VM boots no problem
    • I can install Windows on the disk once the virtio drivers are installed.

    Thanks anyway @bonienl :) 

  8. 2 minutes ago, bonienl said:

    Did you install the virtio driver for disk access (viostor)?

     

    Click on install driver (charger un pilote) and select the CD-drive which holds the virtio drivers. See viostor -> w10 -> amd64.

     

    Thank you for your quick help.

     

    I have indeed already install the vritio drivers from viostor, which is why the disk now shows up. But for some reason Windows will not let me install W10 on this disk

  9. Hello eveyone,

    I am getting this error message when I want to install Windows 10 on a VM.

    I installed the Virtio drivers (the ones for windows 10) which made the disk show up but then now I can't go on and start the setup.

     

    image.thumb.png.062066a61a3c7b438c172d1b9d307818.png

     

    The text in french reads "Windows cannot be installed on this disk. This may be because the hardware does not support booting from this disk. Check the disk controller of this disk is activated in the BIOS menu of your computer."

     

    What am I doing wrong? I don't get it :( 

  10. Hello everyone,

    I am very new to unRAID.

     

    I'm running it on a G4560 (which supports VT-d) on an MSI Z170 Gaming Pro AC motherboard in the UEFI of which I have enabled vritualization.

     

    I have a Windows VM set up to work but I'm having a hard time passing a PCI-Express USB card I bought from AliExpress. The card has a Renesas Technology Corp. uPD720201 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 03).

    It is detected by unRAID in the System Devices

     

    I watched @gridrunner 's super video tutorial about how to list the different USB buses and IOMMU groups. However, there is something I must be doing wrong.

    The first script lists the USB buses and devices as below :

     

    image.png.f5a8aa0bab1c8397844c039272edda82.png

     

    The USB bus I definitely would like to pass through is the number 4, which represents the two front panel USB ports. I suspect that the number 3 is the 2 rear USB ports of the same PCI card but even when I connect a USB key to these ports it doesn't show up.

     

    When I run the second script @gridrunner shared in his video, here is what shows up :

     

    image.thumb.png.84d852bd5acb30889c29103c4a4ca761.png

     

    So the code I inserted inside the Flash drive's config is :

    vfo-pci.ids=1912:0014

    Which makes the Flash config :

     

    default menu.c32
    menu title Lime Technology, Inc.
    prompt 0
    timeout 50
    label unRAID OS
      menu default
      kernel /bzimage
      append vfo-pci.ids=1912:0014 initrd=/bzroot
    label unRAID OS GUI Mode
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui
    label unRAID OS Safe Mode (no plugins, no GUI)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot unraidsafemode
    label unRAID OS GUI Safe Mode (no plugins)
      kernel /bzimage
      append initrd=/bzroot,/bzroot-gui unraidsafemode
    label Memtest86+
      kernel /memtest

     

    (by the way, it's nice that the USB controller supports reset I guess)

     

    Yet, I can't pass through the PCI device in my Windows 10 VM's settings, and I can't see USB devices in the VM's explorer when I connect them.

     

    I have already tried to update the drivers of the USB controller but Windows says the ones already installed are already up-to-date.

     

    Here's a screenshot of the Device Manager in Windows :

     

    image.png.c15b94be1aabe5f9458ec00fe9093d1f.png

     

    The USB controller shows up but I can't detect any USB device plugged in when I go to the file explorer.

     

    I just tried switching to QC35-2.9 instead of i440fx because the Help reads that QC35 may handle PCI-E devices better than i440fx. But maybe that was a wrong move?

     

    I'm really lost and since I'm new to this the only thing I can do is search for people who've encountered the same problem but I can't really find any.

     

    So to summarize :

    1. Problem 1 : USB devices only show up in unRAID if plugged in the front USB ports, not in the back USB ports
    2. I don't have any PCI device to check in the Windows VM settings, only the USB devices plugged in the front USB ports
    3. Even though the Flash config was editted to pass the USB controller through, I can't really use it in my Windows VM for some reason.

     

    Could you please help me? Thank you in advance.

  11. Hello everyone, I am very new to unRAID as well as to Linux.

    I would like to make my printer useable by both my Windows and my GF's Macbook on the network.

    I've already setup the CUPS docker, and the test page print works fine.
    But I have no idea as to how to get the computers on the network to "see" the printer so as to add it as the default printer for them.

     

    I believe the problem comes from Samba but I have no clue about how to get unRAID to share my CUPS's printer on the network.
    I'm really sorry about how simple this may be once you know how to do it... But I've pretty much tried my best to find the solution by myself before posting here.

     

    Thank you very much in advance.

  12. Hi!

    I'm sorry for updating this thread after it remained inactive for quite some time but I just wanted to thank @Robbie Ferguson for this tool he created.

    This helped me choose which drive I should select as parity drive and what size my PSU should be not to be either oboxiously overkill nor underpowered.

    I'm totally new to unRAID an the only NAS I've been using until now is my Synology DS213J so... switching to unRAID is quite a large hop in several regards, and such small but handy tools make my life easier! :) 

×
×
  • Create New...