Jump to content

luca2

Members
  • Posts

    659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by luca2

  1. I checked the BIOS and it seems to be fine, just unchecked some OC that was there applied to RAM (was stock just find out today).

    The mentioned Machine check events logged now does not appear, but I get in the vm logs this error:

    2024-05-24T16:34:58.679547Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Unable to power on device, stuck in D3
    2024-05-24T16:34:58.683538Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Unable to power on device, stuck in D3
    2024-05-24T16:34:58.821550Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Unable to power on device, stuck in D3
    2024-05-24T16:34:58.825543Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Unable to power on device, stuck in D3

    Any idea what this refers to?

     

     

  2. My system was working fine and some days ago a vw failed working.

    My system:

    Model:	Custom
    M/B:	Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS PRO Version Default string s/n Default string
    BIOS:	American Megatrends International, LLC. Version F36d Dated 07/20/2022
    CPU:	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core @ 3700 MHz
    HVM:	Enabled
    IOMMU:	Enabled
    Cache:	L1 - Cache: 768 KiB, L2 - Cache: 6 MiB, L3 - Cache: 64 MiB
    Memory:	64 GiB DDR4 (max. installable capacity 128 GiB)
    Network:	eth0: 1000 Mbps, full duplex, mtu 1500
    Kernel:	Linux 6.1.74-Unraid x86_64
    OpenSSL:	1.1.1v

    I got this error:

    May 24 17:08:58 Tower kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
    May 24 17:08:58 Tower kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 1: Machine Check: 0 Bank 5: bea0000000000108
    May 24 17:08:58 Tower kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 0 ADDR ffffff8184063e MISC d012000100000000 SYND 4d000000 IPID 500b000000000 
    May 24 17:08:58 Tower kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 2:a20f10 TIME 1716566908 SOCKET 0 APIC 2 microcode a201016
    May 24 17:14:03 Tower root: Fix Common Problems: Error: Machine Check Events detected on your server
    May 24 17:14:03 Tower root: mcelog: ERROR: AMD Processor family 25: mcelog does not support this processor.  Please use the edac_mce_amd module instead.

    Can anyone help me out? I am stuck.

     

  3. Hi, I am running this docker with PIA (openvpn) and I can download torrents but I cannot upload. I guess it has to do with my router blocking the uploads.

    There are ports 58846, 58946, 8112 and 8118 from app to host as shown in the docker tab. Can anyone explain how they actually work?

    I guess I need to add some rules to my firewall to let a port be forwarded to the wan (which one?).

    Hope someone can help me out.

     

  4. 31 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

    This usually means that your are trying to transfer a key that was previously backlisted, i.e., not your current key.

    It was a working plus license. I did not receive any message of it being blacklisted till now. Will contact Unraid.

    Thx.

  5. I replay to myself as I think it is easier this way to explain what I realised. It may make more sense after that.

     

    I attached the content of lab-network.xml (corresponds to virbr1 I am trying to set up) which contains this error: the IP network 192.168.122.0 I posted is the same as virbr0 (the one that is already provided by default by Unraid for virbr0).

     

    I then changed it to a new not used network: 192.168.133.0 and this is what I get after asking virsh # net-dumpxml lab-network:

    <network ipv6='yes'>
      <name>lab-network</name>
      <uuid>e00fd28e-5bfc-4e83-8163-0c17e34562ae</uuid>
      <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0'/>
      <mac address='52:54:00:05:a0:07'/>
    </network>

     

    Still virbr1 is not up and running as virbr0. I pinged 192.168.133.1 from host and there is no answer.

     

    So I thought maybe someone can tell me how virbr0 is defined and where is the config file stored ... and from there I could solve my problem with virbr1.

  6. Hi,

    I read this content which contains a lot of usefull info. But there are still some issues and I hope someone can help me out.

    https://wiki.unraid.net/Manual/VM_Management#Configure_a_Network_Bridge

    Start point: I want to create a virtual network for testing vm´s that should be completely isolated from the host and from other vm´s in br0 / virbr0 / any vlan´s / dockers and from any host's network file sharing protocols running. But it should connect to internet.

    It should still need to connect to internet. I basically want a test-environment.

     

    I haven´t changed anything at the router.

     

    Following Bastl´s @bastl approach helped by @ken-ji I managed to create a new virtual nic (virbr1 called lab-network). The only thing I am not able to reproduce is to get access to internet.

     

    lab-network.xml:

    <network>
      <name>lab-network</name>
      <bridge name="virbr1"/>
      <forward mode="nat"/>
      <ip address="192.168.122.1" netmask="255.255.255.0">
        <dhcp>
          <range start="192.168.122.2" end="192.168.122.254"/>
        </dhcp>
      </ip>
      <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:db8:ca2:2::1" prefix="64"/>
    </network>

     

    virsh # net-list
     Name          State    Autostart   Persistent
    ------------------------------------------------
     default       active   yes         yes
     lab-network   active   yes         yes
    

     

    Default (does provide internet access):

    virsh # net-dumpxml default
    <network>
      <name>default</name>
      <uuid>db01278f-bf88-44da-43d4-e0b4eb46f456</uuid>
      <forward mode='nat'>
        <nat>
          <port start='1024' end='65535'/>
        </nat>
      </forward>
      <bridge name='virbr0' stp='on' delay='0'/>
      <mac address='52:54:00:72:08:e9'/>
      <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'>
        <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.2' end='192.168.122.254'/>
        </dhcp>
      </ip>
    </network>

     

    Lab-network:

    <network ipv6='yes'>
      <name>lab-network</name>
      <uuid>e00fd28e-5bfc-4e83-8163-0c17e34562ae</uuid>
      <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0'/>
      <mac address='52:54:00:05:a0:07'/>
    </network>

     

    What I am missing?

     

    Rgds

     

  7. Hi,

     

    I was not sure where to post this question. My goal is to setup vm´s that are completely isolated from other vm´s and the host.

     

    I have been resarching but do not want to start messing up in my unraid server with instructions from other OS´s/Sytems.

     

    I have read it can be done passing through a network card (I do not have free pci slots now for this) or setting up vlans (a managed switch is required; I own one but need to figure out how this can be done).

     

    Would like to hear from someone who has done or is running such a setup what is the easiest approach to this. And if you could suggest some reading (article/web) where the logic is explained would be great.

     

    Rgds

  8. Hi,

    Is there any procedure I should follow to test an unraid system (flash) and all the data stored in the shares and check if the hacker put anything malicious in it?

    The user got attacked by a hacker who got unlimited access to the system (a desktop connected to unraid) for 1 hour.

    I already powered off + reset the router, formatted a different desktop in the network, tested the usb(unraid) for viruses and connected this desktop to unraid again. No other pc´s are connected to unraid.

    Any thoughts are welcome.

    Rgds.

     

  9. Hi,

    After reading some posts about this topic I could not find anything specific for a 5900x. I want to assign 8 cores to a vm. Just curious if anyone has done this before and can share with me his experience.

    This are the core pairs:

    imagen.png.6b8d0f2cdb6224029b1c94f3554195de.png

    I guess they are paired like this because they are the SMT pairs, right?

     

    After further reading I found this: "The 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X and 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X are parts that have two 8-core CCDs besides the cIOD. The 5900X is carved out by disabling any two cores per CCD"...

    imagen.png.a82162ee3068e77e260539840606cf4a.png

    Can I assume that 1 CCD has cores 0-11 and the second CCD has 12-23?

    Rgds

  10. Hi,

     

    I am succesfully running several windows vm´s with the provided templates.

     

    I recently found a problem running a called Valorant, that uses an anti- cheat-engine that makes a lot of trouble. It is not an Unraid problem, but I would like to find a solution for this, since I saw a video of someone solving it running kmv+amd

    He mentions he enabled this:

    options kvm ignore_msrs=1

    options kvm report_ignored_msrs=0

    options kvm_amd npt=1 avic=1

     

    I was wondering if this can be implemented without any impact on the other vm´s?

    Where should this be placed .. in the Flash>Syslinux configuration?

     

    Anything I should change in my actual xml (I attach the one this guy in YT posted and my xml)?

     

    In case you need any other data pls let me know. I am running on 6.10.0-rc2.

     

    Rgds

     

     

     

     

     

     

    myXML youtubeXML

  11. On 1/31/2022 at 3:02 PM, trurl said:
    Jan 29 10:39:42 shogun emhttpd: unclean shutdown detected
    ...
    Jan 29 10:40:03 shogun kernel: mdcmd (36): check nocorrect
    ...
    Jan 30 05:45:16 shogun kernel: md: sync done. time=68713sec
    Jan 30 05:45:16 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: exit status: 0

    Unclean shutdown automatic parity checks are non-correcting.

     

    Then you manually ran a correcting parity check which corrected the errors the non-correcting parity check found.

    Jan 30 12:44:39 shogun kernel: mdcmd (37): check 
    Jan 30 12:44:39 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: check P ...
    Jan 30 12:44:39 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: P corrected, sector=0
    ...
    Jan 30 20:07:40 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: P corrected, sector=5438978488
    Jan 30 20:07:40 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: stopped logging
    ...
    Jan 31 08:00:55 shogun kernel: md: sync done. time=69376sec
    Jan 31 08:00:55 shogun kernel: md: recovery thread: exit status: 0
    

    Run another non-correcting parity check to verify.

     

    Do you know why you had unclean shutdown?

    Hi, sorry for delay, but could not test it till yesterday. You are right, this is exactly what happened. I ran a third parity check and it showed no errors.

     

    I don´t know why I had an unclean shutdown. Sometimes the server just cannot shutdown, so I have to do a hard reset. Usually it has to when I have been messing up editing the xml of the vm´s.

     

    Thx another time for support! Have a nice day.

  12. I am running latest stable. I did a parity check (30 January) and 696 errors showed up. Then I did next day another one and the same 696 errors were found.

    Is there a way I can check what errors did parity check find?

    Anything I should to look into?

    Rgds.

    image.png.c1104bfebe3c6a3cea01625df5a4a6e0.png

  13. Hi, is it possible to access files from an external hard drive mounted using UD in binhex-krusader docker? I read about ntfs-3g here:https://wiki.unraid.net/Mounting_an_external_USB_drive_having_an_existing_NTFS_file_system_in_READ/WRITE_mode_to_transport_files_from/to_unRaid_server but I would like to manage transfer of files using binhex-krusader´s docker.

    If it is not supported, what is the best way to achieve transfer of files between ext.hdd nounted with UD and unraid share?

     

×
×
  • Create New...