dakipro
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Thank you kind stranger, you have saved the day (after way too many hours of frustration and manually adjusting the config file)
-
same for me, tried few times for couple of hours without any luck. It worked once a month ago, but not anymore. I will wait for smart people of the internet to make this easier, and I revisit.
-
I am having exact same issue as you @luhzifer, I do not use system level proxy, but privoxy has its port open, and firefox on one of my machines is configured to use it. Worked fine, but problems strangely started few months ago. Changing the PIA endpoints didn't help, restarting helps from time to time, but... it is very annoying. I think it has something with DSN/CDN's to do, as once all requests are resolved the speed is at max, but I haven't found time to investigate further to be honest. Hoped to just find a solution here, as usual
-
I am having the same problem, I am trying to backup my proxmox VMs to unraid over NFS, but I cannot get the "ERROR: Backup of VM 100 failed - job failed with err -116 - Stale file handle" unstuck
-
I did the Q22 fix, but and it helped for a few days, but today all stopped again. Re-downloading and re-applying Q22 did not help in my case I tried using DE Berlin and DE Frankfurt. Even though I get the error from down below, internet does start working, and I am behind the VPN (based on IP) but it is very very slow (think gprs). It is so slow that I cannot even run a speed test. I guess that is because of port forwarding problem? The error I get 2020-11-09 23:37:32 DEPRECATED OPTION: --cipher set to 'aes-256-gcm' but missing in --data-ciphers (AES-256-GCM:AES-128-GCM). Future OpenVPN version will ignore --cipher for cipher negotiations. Add 'aes-256-gcm' to --data-ciphers or change --cipher 'aes-256-gcm' to --data-ciphers-fallback 'aes-256-gcm' to silence this warning. 2020-11-09 23:37:32 WARNING: file 'credentials.conf' is group or others accessible (this warning I get from time to time) The file DE Frankfurt.ovpn client dev tun proto udp remote de-frankfurt.privacy.network 1198 resolv-retry infinite nobind persist-key persist-tun cipher aes-256-gcm ncp-disable auth sha1 tls-client remote-cert-tls server auth-user-pass compress verb 1 reneg-sec 0 <crl-verify> -----BEGIN X509 CRL----- .....
-
Hi, could this container be used to bounce against multiple VPNs via privoxy? I've been using it for years on unraid and it works awesome, one of the best containers out there, I couldn't live without it now. However on my last holiday I was uploading files via my ubiquity vpn to my unraid, and the it guy got jealous and blocked connection between my pc and my home/vpn IP. Now, I was about to boot VM inside my pc, so that my PC would connect to PIA vpn, and my VM would then connect to my home vpn, but then I found that I could still upload via my phone so I used that instead. Could this container be used for this scenario, where my pc would connect to some PIA server, and the OpenVpn would then connect to my home, and privoxy would be used for some browser/client so that I could upload files to my vpn? Or am I missing some obvious way of doing such VPN through another VPN solution on windows?
-
I would also like to use nzbget via VPN if that is somehow possible, meaning to do downloads trough vpn? I found on internet that nzbget does not support proxy configuration, so perhaps it is possible to add it via docker itself, like some parameter or something? I understand that it is not needed since ssl is used, but somehow I would feel much better, not even sure why... Please enjoy a beer @binhex as a than you for another excellent container!
-
Hi, First I must say that I really enjoy using Unraid, I think it is amazing peace of software that solves A LOT of my problems, and I have been searching for it for years. As the title says, share "media" is set to not use the cache, but files do exist on the cache drive itself. People helped me and on this post explained that this is a linux thing, that occurs if I have some data on "cache-only-share" (cache set to Yes) and I move it over the network to some other "no-cache-only-share" (cache set to "No"), that linux will just rename file and make the data end up on the cache drive, under new share (even though that share cache is set to No). I understand why is this happening, but for me this is a pretty common use case, f.eks. downloads(cached) and media share(no-cache), and also for backup-cached-network-share where all PCs would backup over network and then another script would move files to backup-non-network-share, protecting data from ransomware and viruses that would delete my backups. This makes some part of the data ending up on the cache file reducing its space, but even worst it makes data not parity protected. And the worst part is that this is virtually undetectable from unraid unless you know and do look for it specifically (I found out about it using Fix common problems community plugin). It makes using the "no" for cache practically useless, even worst it makes entire unraid system and server unreliable. I have to use yes for cache drive, keeping data even longer on the cache drive until the mover runs. Unraid advertises itself as "Unraid is an operating system for personal and small business" and also it says "Stop worrying about losing your data due to storage device failure. Unraid saves your data even if one device goes bad", but in this use case of moving data around this is just not correct, some data (in reality randomly) ends up unprotected. Perhaps make this No cache not an option when cache drive is in use? Or at least show a big red triangle with some explanation as to why is this combination dangerous? Or maybe even make mover do move files to its expected location? I've come to conclusion from mentioned post that this is rather old and well known case (from the beginning?) but I would really like to hear opinion from some people from Limetech about the issue, as it seems like a very common use case and a serious issue of leaving files unprotected.
-
Hi @binhex is it possible to access/use clipboard from the browser or client when accessing Krusader container? Meaning, I can open a file in krusader editor, and copy/paste to my pc?
-
Hei @binhex, great work as always Any chance of having this container use some proxy for outgoing communication? I am using privoxy from your delugevpn and it works great, however in my country some subtitle providers are being blocked, so I would like Plex to use privoxy when fetching movies/songs metadata from the internet. I read online that plex would use host configuration, thus there is no such config from plex itself, so perhaps you can do some docker magic here? Thanks again for great containers and as usually, buying you a beer!
-
hi, I tried starting the container for the first time yesterday, and I keep getting this error RROR:root:Error trying to get releases from Github. Connection Error. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/check_update.py", line 54, in check_releases r = requests.get(url_releases, timeout=15) File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/../libs/requests/api.py", line 72, in get return request('get', url, params=params, **kwargs) File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/../libs/requests/api.py", line 58, in request return session.request(method=method, url=url, **kwargs) File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/../libs/requests/sessions.py", line 512, in request resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs) File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/../libs/requests/sessions.py", line 622, in send r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs) File "/app/bazarr/bazarr/../libs/requests/adapters.py", line 513, in send raise ConnectionError(e, request=request) ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='api.github.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /repos/morpheus65535/Bazarr/releases (Caused by NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x14df434f3990>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -3] Try again',)) Today it doesn't start either with same error
-
Hey guys, new user here. I would like this dashboard, but I am not quite comfortable of adding it, as I do not quite have control over variables and logs etc. I installed latest unraid, what do I need to (and how) add to have netdata running without worrying of it crashing or overpopulating logs etc? Is it just "install and go"? I read I should add this parameter --log-opt max-size=50m --log-opt max-file=1, where do I add it, I get these fields when I wish to add variable (I think that is what I wish): Config Type: Variable Name: Key: Value: Description: What do I put as key, and what as value? Is it two variables, or how to add this parameter? Anything else I should set up? I basically want to see how much cpu does each container use. Thanks!
-
That is great. Have you thought perhaps of some sort of automatic VPN tunnel test (perhaps in a separated container)? Something that would ping something, and check that all is good? I am just thinking out loud... it might be useful (and reassuring) to just show it on some dashboard or somewhere else, that VPN is up and running, current IP this-and-that, last re-connected timestamp, ping... even simple json response that other dashboards could pick up, or even command line response, whatever is easiest..
-
Thank you! I was 99% sure this is the case, just wanted to hear it confirmed from someone else (you )
-
First thanks for the awesome container(s) Binhex! Quick question, is it possible that privoxy doesn't have a tunnel up, but still provide unsecured traffic to something outside its container? (firefox etc..) I've seen similar (but not the same :)) question being asked about kill switch/firewall that doesn't allow IP leak for built in deluge (as part of the container). My question is, is this still valid if other services or containers use only privoxy part of the container? Meaning, I use my firefox (or any other client) and have proxy set up to use privoxy? If privoxy tunnel fails, would firefox be stopped? (I have tested without privoxy running, and obviously there is no internet as there is no proxy service, but I do not know how to make vpn tunnel fail and then have privoxy running without valid tunnel to test for leaks, if you know what I mean ) Thanks again for the awesome work!