-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
It did eventually finish and I was able to do the same to the second drive and let it run over night. My (hopefully last) question is, does this seem like an excessive amount of reads/writes for brand new drives?? tower-diagnostics-20240730-0813.zip
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
Any idea how long the btrfs operation should take? It's been running for hours now and I only have like 300GB data on the drives.... root@Tower:~# btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: aa9fb921-7e3f-427d-8bfe-43753c232a81 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 353.46GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 354.03GiB path /dev/sde1 devid 2 size 0 used 0 path /dev/sdd1 MISSING devid 3 size 1.86TiB used 326.03GiB path /dev/nvme1n1p1 Label: none uuid: 799888ac-cff8-4a2e-9b18-58cab1dac3d7 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 17.73GiB devid 1 size 200.00GiB used 40.02GiB path /dev/loop2 Label: none uuid: 2ba05aca-92aa-42ac-8a73-daf2d1866102 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 552.00KiB devid 1 size 1.00GiB used 126.38MiB path /dev/loop3
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
OMG, I think cache pool is good now. Diags below. Can you walk me through what we did here? Then also how I should proceed to upgrade to the NVME drives? I'm buying you a beer for sure. tower-diagnostics-20240729-1321.zip
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
to confirm I am going to: stop array unassign both cache drives (so I now have no drives in the pool) start the array stop the array assign both original devices to the cache pool again start the array post diags correct?
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
>>> 64 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x6a24e7da. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. Partition #1 contains a btrfs signature. Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o: n /dev/sdd1 : 64 1953525167 (931.5G) Linux /dev/sdd2: w unsupported command /dev/sdd2: write New situation: Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x6a24e7da Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sdd1 64 1953525167 1953525104 931.5G 83 Linux The partition table has been altered. Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table. Syncing disks. root@Tower:~# btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: aa9fb921-7e3f-427d-8bfe-43753c232a81 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 373.90GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 639.00GiB path /dev/sde1 devid 2 size 931.51GiB used 639.03GiB path /dev/sdd1
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o: n /dev/sdd1 : 64 1953525167 (931.5G) Linux /dev/sdd2: w unsupported command root@Tower:~# btrfs fi show warning, device 2 is missing ERROR: cannot read chunk root Label: none uuid: aa9fb921-7e3f-427d-8bfe-43753c232a81 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 373.90GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 639.00GiB path /dev/sde1 *** Some devices missing I may have messed up as I missed your initial instruction to hit "w" first. So I repeated your instruction but now it is on sdd2. See below for full steps: >>> 64 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0xf405de7a. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. Partition #1 contains a btrfs signature. Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o: n /dev/sdd1 : 64 1953525167 (931.5G) Linux /dev/sdd2: btrfs fi show unsupported command /dev/sdd2: ^C unsupported command /dev/sdd2: ^C root@Tower:~# btrfs fi show warning, device 2 is missing ERROR: cannot read chunk root Label: none uuid: aa9fb921-7e3f-427d-8bfe-43753c232a81 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 373.90GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 639.00GiB path /dev/sde1 *** Some devices missing root@Tower:~# sfdisk /dev/sdd Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.38.1). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdd: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: Samsung SSD 860 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes sfdisk is going to create a new 'dos' disk label. Use 'label: <name>' before you define a first partition to override the default. Type 'help' to get more information. >>> 64 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x6a24e7da. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. Partition #1 contains a btrfs signature. Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o: n /dev/sdd1 : 64 1953525167 (931.5G) Linux /dev/sdd2: w unsupported command /dev/sdd2:
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
root@Tower:~# sfdisk /dev/sdd Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.38.1). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdd: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: Samsung SSD 860 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes sfdisk is going to create a new 'dos' disk label. Use 'label: <name>' before you define a first partition to override the default. Type 'help' to get more information. >>> 64 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0xf405de7a. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. Partition #1 contains a btrfs signature. Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o:
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
root@Tower:~# sfdisk /dev/sdd Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.38.1). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdd: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: Samsung SSD 860 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes sfdisk is going to create a new 'dos' disk label. Use 'label: <name>' before you define a first partition to override the default. Type 'help' to get more information. >>> 2048 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x820aaa46. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. /dev/sdd1 : 2048 1953525167 (931.5G) Linux
-
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
tower-diagnostics-20240729-1204.zip root@Tower:~# btrfs fi show warning, device 2 is missing ERROR: cannot read chunk root Label: none uuid: aa9fb921-7e3f-427d-8bfe-43753c232a81 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 373.90GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 639.00GiB path /dev/sde1 *** Some devices missing
-
Help! unmountable: unsupported or no file system after Cache Upgrade Attempt
All, I have a cache pool of 2x1TB SSDs using btrfs and I was trying to swap to 2x2TB NVME drives. I have all four drives in the chassis and did a pre-clear on the new drives. I tried to follow the instructions here: As soon as I swapped the secondary drive in the cache pool and restarted the array it started giving me the error "unmountable: unsupported or no file system" on both cache drives. I tried switching the cache back to the original secondary in the original order in the cache pool, but now I am still getting the same error. Even when I remove the secondary drive completely I get the same error. I tried to attempt a scrub, but it is grayed out and says the array must be started (even when it is). A check with read-only gives me the below error: bad tree block 1242422575104, bytenr mismatch, want=1242422575104, have=0 ERROR: cannot read chunk root ERROR: cannot open file system Opening filesystem to check... warning, device 2 is missing
-
[Plugin] Nvidia-Driver
Ah, I may have quoted the wrong post as I was reading through this. Diagnostics are attached. It's just odd that it was working fine and then randomly stopped. tower-diagnostics-20231023-1206.zip
-
[Plugin] Nvidia-Driver
I'm in the same boat. I have a GTX 1060 that was working great for transcoding. I recently noticed that my GPU Statistics said "N/A" for everything and the GPU doesn't work anymore. I'm getting a ton of those RmInitAdapter failed messages now, but I didn't change anything with my BIOS or HW. Not sure why this would just start all of a sudden and it seems like it's happening to multiple people.
atlasalex
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited