Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Jeffarese

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey, one question. Given that I'm running in a more or less powerfull machine (R9 3900x, 64GB RAM), with plenty of resources, is there any settings/tweaks that can be done to increase the performance further? I'm currently sitting at 1700 torrents and sometimes I get timeouts, it seems that nginx can't handle it that well (even if rTorrent itself is a beast)
  2. Ah yeah, that seems to be the problem. In order to access the container I do docker exec -it binhex-rtorrentvpn /bin/bash That logs me in as root. How is the normal procedure to access it as nobody? just docker exec -it --user nobody binhex-rtorrentvpn /bin/bash?
  3. I did `tmux ls` and it said that "no server running"
  4. Is there any way at all to attach to the running irssi process to be able to control it? Or to restart irssi without restarting the whole container? It would be nice to start it on its own `screen` so we can attach to the process.
  5. I just installed the latest RC7 and one of the ethernet ports on my motherboard (X570 Aorus Master) won't work. https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570-AORUS-MASTER-rev-10#kf This port is the one I was using previous to the update. I changed the cable to the Realtek 2.5G port and it works fine tho, but I would prefer to use the Intel one. Attached diagnostics. orthanc-diagnostics-20191125-1449.zip
  6. Jackett was auto updated and a segfault appeared in logs: Oct 24 02:07:54 Orthanc Docker Auto Update: Stopping jackett Oct 24 02:07:54 Orthanc kernel: jackett[15933]: segfault at 10 ip 000015497d9b8fa0 sp 00007ffcf94158d8 error 4 in libpthread-2.27.so[15497d9af000+1a000] Oct 24 02:07:54 Orthanc kernel: Code: 07 00 00 00 48 89 df b8 ca 00 00 00 0f 05 64 48 c7 04 25 f0 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 b8 83 00 00 00 e9 a8 fb ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 <8b> 47 10 89 c2 81 e2 7f 01 00 00 90 83 e0 7c 0f 85 9b 00 00 00 48 Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc kernel: veth13798ed: renamed from eth0 Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc kernel: br-d45ab5905980: port 10(veth98599ed) entered disabled state Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc kernel: br-d45ab5905980: port 10(veth98599ed) entered disabled state Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc kernel: device veth98599ed left promiscuous mode Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc kernel: br-d45ab5905980: port 10(veth98599ed) entered disabled state Oct 24 02:07:57 Orthanc Docker Auto Update: Stopping lidarr Oct 24 02:08:01 Orthanc kernel: veth3683ba0: renamed from eth0 Oct 24 02:08:01 Orthanc kernel: br-d45ab5905980: port 5(vethd40c869) entered disabled state Everything works fine (as far as I can tell), but I'm worried about seeing a segfault on the logs. Anybody knows what could be happening? Attached diagnostics orthanc-diagnostics-20191024-0547.zip
  7. I installed it and I wasn't able to hardlink. It said something like: Cannot create hardlink: Function not implemented yet. It wasn't a crash, it was a message saying it's not implemented. Why does that happen? Is that going to be like that in the final release?
  8. It does, as I'm saying, but it's implemented in a way where that .db file is in the share where the user data is stored, so it's out of the cache in a normal configuration.
  9. This container is a full nextcloud container. I used it without anything else external.
  10. What MariaDB container? The problem is that there are two shares. One where you store the config, which should be on cache. The other where you store the data, which obviously is in the array. This was created in a way that the owncloud.db is on the share that you need to store in the array.
  11. Didn't know about that website, good to know! Maybe some of the websites ship outside Germany, I'll take a look.
  12. What he says happens even with the share being in the cache drive. I ended up not using nextcloud because of this.
  13. Is anybody getting the tracker icons correctly? They are not showing in mine, never did, and there's a lot of 404 requests trying to access a URL that doesn't exist (something like "http://localhost:port/trackers/trackername".
  14. Hello, I'm upgrading a server I have at home and I'm looking at Epyc & Threadripper CPUs. My needs are: 1 VM as main development server which also acts as CI/CD running tests Multiple VMs for testing VPN & firewall Media center (automation with Plex, Sonarr, Radarr...etc) I currently have aprox 80TB and I'm planning on keep increasing this storage a lot, so I need plenty of room for storage expansion. I also need to have some NVMe drives in RAID 0 / 10 for some very intensive IO tasks. I do NOT need GPU power. Looking at the new Epyc 7002 series they actually seem cheaper than current Threadrippers, the only thing it's holding me back in that regard is that at least here in Europe Epyc motherboards are pretty hard to get get. Also, is there any reason to chose Threadripper over Epyc in my use case? high frequency is not needed for my use case at all, so I think it would be a waste of power. In any case, which boards would you recommend? Anybody have similar setups? Thanks!