Jump to content

Ernie11

Members
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ernie11

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Hello Jonp, Thank you for the reply. I have tried so many combinations that honestly I cant remember them all. With the information you provided I think I will step aside from trying this for now and see if maybe other people who have more knowledge can get it running. Maybe in the future I will update this post with the attempts I made.
  2. Hello, Im trying to run Dota 2 on a Linux Mint VM but I have been unable to do so. I tried to use vulkan, dx11, dx9, opengl and nothing. I think it has to do with how Steam is recognizing the VNC im using to project the screen. Below is the display specs that Linux Mint shows and the error. Does anyone have an idea? Could it be that im missing a driver? Im on the latest Mesa driver for what I know. Thanks.
  3. Hello Testdasi, So you are saying that if I open create a VM with VNC and use the VM to install drives, nomachine, ect I cant change the graphics card to something else? I have to stay on VNC? If thats the case then I have to create a VM from scratch using the gpu from the start?
  4. Hello Everyone, Has anyone tried to passthrough the integrated graphics of AMD to a VM? I have tried lots of combinations but haven’t been able to. Below is my setup. I’m trying to pass the integrated graphics to a Linux Mint VM. Is there a tutorial someone can share or if someone has done this can you please explain how you did it. Thanks. M/B: ASRock B450 Pro4 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. Version P3.10. Dated: 03/07/2019 CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 3500 MHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Enabled Memory: 16 GiB DDR4 Kernel: Linux 4.19.56-Unraid x86_64
  5. Hello Everyone, Im having an issue with getting a vm to run with the onboard graphics. I create the VM using VNC and then install nomachine. But when I turn it off and start it selecting my onboard graphics I get an error on my disk1 which is where the VM resides. I have to rebuild my disk1 because of this. I though the first time was something wrong I did from all the testing but it has happened again. Am I doing something wrong? Can I passthough my onboard graphics to a VM? Thanks M/B: ASRock B450 Pro4 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. Version P3.10. Dated: 03/07/2019 CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 3500 MHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Enabled Memory: 16 GiB DDR4 Kernel: Linux 4.19.56-Unraid x86_64 -realtime mlock=off \ -smp 3,sockets=1,cores=3,threads=1 \ -uuid (took this out) \ -display none \ -no-user-config \ -nodefaults \ -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,fd=27,server,nowait \ -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control \ -rtc base=utc,driftfix=slew \ -global kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=delay \ -no-hpet \ -no-shutdown \ -boot strict=on \ -device pcie-root-port,port=0x10,chassis=1,id=pci.1,bus=pcie.0,multifunction=on,addr=0x2 \ -device pcie-root-port,port=0x11,chassis=2,id=pci.2,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x1 \ -device pcie-root-port,port=0x12,chassis=3,id=pci.3,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x2 \ -device pcie-root-port,port=0x13,chassis=4,id=pci.4,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x3 \ -device pcie-root-port,port=0x14,chassis=5,id=pci.5,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x2.0x4 \ -device ich9-usb-ehci1,id=usb,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x7.0x7 \ -device ich9-usb-uhci1,masterbus=usb.0,firstport=0,bus=pcie.0,multifunction=on,addr=0x7 \ -device ich9-usb-uhci2,masterbus=usb.0,firstport=2,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x7.0x1 \ -device ich9-usb-uhci3,masterbus=usb.0,firstport=4,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x7.0x2 \ -device virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.2,addr=0x0 \ -drive file=/mnt/user/domains/Linux/vdisk1.img,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk2,cache=writeback \ -device virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.3,addr=0x0,drive=drive-virtio-disk2,id=virtio-disk2,bootindex=1,write-cache=on \ -netdev tap,fd=29,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=30 \ -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=(took this out),bus=pci.1,addr=0x0 \ -chardev pty,id=charserial0 \ -device isa-serial,chardev=charserial0,id=serial0 \ -chardev socket,id=charchannel0,fd=31,server,nowait \ -device virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=1,chardev=charchannel0,id=channel0,name=org.qemu.guest_agent.0 \ -device usb-tablet,id=input0,bus=usb.0,port=1 \ -device vfio-pci,host=38:00.0,id=hostdev0,x-vga=on,bus=pci.4,addr=0x0 \ -sandbox on,obsolete=deny,elevateprivileges=deny,spawn=deny,resourcecontrol=deny \ -msg timestamp=on 2019-08-06 02:19:37.194+0000: Domain id=5 is tainted: high-privileges 2019-08-06 02:19:37.194+0000: Domain id=5 is tainted: host-cpu char device redirected to /dev/pts/0 (label charserial0) 2019-08-06T02:24:19.031357Z qemu-system-x86_64: terminating on signal 15 from pid 8607 (/usr/sbin/libvirtd) 2019-08-06 02:24:19.831+0000: shutting down, reason=destroyed
  6. Hello, I think I figured it out after 2 hours more of tinkering. The initial ram was set to 1GB and the max to 5GB. I’m guessing I was running on 1GB this whole time. Once I set both to 10GB it started to work better. Doesn’t feel like a 3 core 10GB ram computer yet though. My 10 year old apple with 2 cores 4GB runs better. Now I’m trying to run a game on it to see what it can do. I will post again if it’s still sluggish with the diagnostics.
  7. Hello Everyone, I have created an Ubuntu VM on my unraid but its super slow. I have everything pinned to core0 and my VM is pinned to core 1-3. I got it to install after having to reboot the VM like 4 times since it would get stuck each time. Once it was installed I was able to install anydesk on it and it worked faster than VNC. The problem is that opening anything makes my 3 cores go to 90%+ and it will stay there. The program (most times just firefox) wouldnt even finish opening and I would have to restart the VM. I uninstalled Ubuntu thinking it was the OS thats the problem and when I tried Linux Mint im getting sort of the same thing. The installation had no problems. I couldnt get anydesk running on it but thats fine. When I open firefox it pins my cores to 70%+ and firefox hasnt even loaded the home page in 20 minutes. I have 5GB of ram assigned to it. Does anyone know what the problem could be? M/B: ASRock B450 Pro4 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. Version P3.10. Dated: 03/07/2019 CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with Radeon Vega Graphics @ 3500 MHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Enabled Memory: 16 GiB DDR4 Kernel: Linux 4.19.56-Unraid x86_64 OpenSSL: 1.1.1c Ernie.
  8. What I meant on my previous post is that when I change the split level to the top 3 directories and then use kruzader it does balance the information on the disks. Even though it makes the folders in advance. Both my drives fill up equally. The only problem is that I end up with information all over both disks because of the split 3. When I change to split 2 for tv shows it just writes everything to the same disk and doesn’t split.
  9. Hello. I looked in Kruzader and I dont find an option so it doesnt make the destination folders first. But this brings a new question, why does it make new destination folders when "top 3" is used?
  10. I think i just understood your post and the flaw with coping large amounts of data to an array with a software. Is there a software for unRaid that does not create destination folders ahead of time? This would let unRaid choose a new disk based on the settings after each folder is complete. It does create the destination folders ahead of time. Then it fills it just like you said.
  11. Hello. I did some testing and im more confused now. I have 2 x 4TB array HDDs. I set a TV Shows share to "Most-free" and to "Automatically split only the top two directory..." and copied my TV Shows to it and see what happened. Before it all started there was 25GB in Disk1 and 15BG in Disk2. It started to copy everything to Disk2 like it should since its the one with less information on it. Once Disk2 got to over 25GB and it finished copying the current folder it does not switch to Disk1 for the next folder (season). It keeps using Disk2. I then deleted everything I transferred and did it again but this time with the share setting "Automatically split only the top three directory....". I expected it to work this time but this time it started to put the individual episode on different disk and not by season either. My TV shows folder setup on my unassigned drive. TV Shows (folder) > Series Name (folder) > Season Number (folder) > Episodes (files) Im guessing TV Shows folder on my unassigned drive becomes the share and I transfer the folders with the series name to the share right? I experimented the same with Movies and it went from putting all the movie on the same disk (top two directory) to putting the movies, subs, images of the same movie on different disks (top three directory). It seems to skip the folder I want to split on in both cases. Am I doing something wrong?
  12. Hello. Even if split level was wrong wouldn’t there be at least something being written to the second disk? The split folder for movies is top level. So the idea is that movies get spread across the disks but everything related to the specific movie gets stored together. This is is what I want as layout. Movies (user share) > Movie_1 folder > movie, subs, images, etc. This is what I want written. Example. Disk1 Movie_1 folder > movie, subs, etc. Movie_4 folder > movie, subs, etc. Disk2 Movie_2 folder > movie, subs, etc. Movie_3 folder > movie, subs, etc. For TV shows I put to use second level since I want everything from a season on a disk and split onto other disks but I don’t mind having a series have season 1 on disk1 then seasons 2 on disk2.
  13. Hello Everyone. Im a new user to unRAID and im trying to transfer the data from my current HDDs to my array. I have followed the video spaceinvaderone has created which was really helpful but I notice something that I have not found the answer to. I got 1.2TB of media I need to transfer and when I used kruzader to do this I notice it all gets copied to the same disk. I selected all the files and dragged to the user share and selected copy. The share is setup to use "All" disks (2 array disks right now) and has a setting of "Most-free" but it still only copies to the same disk. If I copy a little data until my first disk has more data than the second disk then make another copy of a little data then it writes to the second disk. So my question is, does Kruzader consider one "drag and copy" as one transfer and thats why its only copying to the same disk? Is there a way to transfer large amounts of data but that it still follows the setting of the share? Thanks, E.