xxbigfootxx
-
Posts
89 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by xxbigfootxx
-
-
All finished and parity is valid. Everything working great. Thanks again!
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Are you going to replace an existing disk with the 6TB or add it as a new disk?
Just add it back in as a new disk. I've started the parity sync/ data rebuild, so will hopefully have good news tomorrow when it's completed. Thanks for all your help @JorgeB!
-
Would this be the correct process for that?
1. Remove the 6tb parity.
2a. Add the 8tb as a parity drive. Allow the array to rebuild.
2b. Start the array Allow the array to rebuild.
3. Pre clear the 6th (old parity)
4a. Stop the array
4b. Add the 6tb (old parity) to the array.
4c. Start the array
-
11 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Without a disable disk there's no real need to use the parity swap procedure, but it can still be used if you disable the data disk first, like mentioned here:
So how would i go about inserting a disk that is larger than the current parity? Add the old drive back in, wait for the data rebuild then action the steps in the link to stop array, unassign the disk, restart array, stop again, assign new 8tb disk as parity and the 6tb as same data drive that was rebuilt?
Would that be the best way to do it? Or is there an easier/faster method?
-
1 minute ago, JorgeB said:
And parity was re-synced?
Yes it was
-
28 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
or did you do a new config?
New config
-
7 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
And that still doesn't answer what happened to disk6, if parity was valid with it it's not without it.
After a few reboots the disk was showing as unassigned. Disk was showing errors before
-
51 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
How come now it's disk3? What happened to disk6?
I tried all slots just to test the error. Same on all disk slots
-
54 minutes ago, itimpi said:
Are you also trying to rebuild disk4?
No disk4 was removed from the server.
-
On 10/10/2020 at 11:23 PM, itimpi said:
I would do this after checking that all the cabling (both power and SATA) looks OK.
Okay so the pre-clear finished with no issues. But now parity swap won't work?
-
10 hours ago, itimpi said:
I would do this after checking that all the cabling (both power and SATA) looks OK.
I've changed the SATA and power and running pre-clear just for peace of mind. Will let you know after I restart the parity swap
-
10 minutes ago, trurl said:
Connection problems on new parity
What would you recommend doing? Should i leave it for another day and see how it goes?
It is a brand new drive, but i haven't run a pre-clear on it. Should i cancel the parity swap and do the pre-clear then try again?
-
I'm also having the same issue. One of my drive died and the only spare i had was an 8TB, so decided to action the parity swap.
It has been running for about 20 hours and has not moved from 1% but i am getting reads on both drives in the GUI.
Have attached the logs
-
I've also got this issue on mine. Server has only been running for 2 days at this point.
du -sm /var/log/*
0 /var/log/btmp
0 /var/log/cron
0 /var/log/debug
1 /var/log/diskinfo.log
1 /var/log/dmesg
1 /var/log/docker.log
0 /var/log/faillog
0 /var/log/lastlog
1 /var/log/libvirt
1 /var/log/maillog
0 /var/log/messages
0 /var/log/nfsd
1 /var/log/nginx
1 /var/log/openvpnserver.log
0 /var/log/packages
0 /var/log/pkgtools
1 /var/log/plugins
0 /var/log/preclear.disk.log
0 /var/log/removed_packages
0 /var/log/removed_scripts
0 /var/log/removed_uninstall_scripts
1 /var/log/samba
0 /var/log/scripts
0 /var/log/secure
0 /var/log/setup
0 /var/log/spooler
0 /var/log/swtpm
1 /var/log/syslog
128 /var/log/syslog.1
1 /var/log/vfio-pci
1 /var/log/wtmpI seem to have two syslog files, one that is named syslog1 that is using all the log memory. Can anyone tell me what that is?
-
8 minutes ago, jonathanm said:
It's not your configuration, it's your router. Google your router model, along with the search terms nat loopback hairpinning reflection
If it's not supported does that mean that i'll have to stick with the local adresses instead of using the subdomain?
-
I'm having an issue with my subdomains that i've configured. All are accessible outside my network with no issues at all, but i can't seem to connect internally.
I know there must be some setting that i've done incorrectly, but i can't figure it out. Anyone know what might be causing it?
let me know what logs to provide if needed.
-
On 11/29/2018 at 2:22 AM, busa1 said:
Please let me know if you have any news for me.
Did you manage to get this resolved at all @busa1?
-
15 hours ago, ghost82 said:
Can you issue the following command from the vm:
networksetup -getdnsservers ethernet
I get this error when trying to run networksetup
When you say the network config for the device, do you mean the VM Manager settings? I'm bridging my default ethernet adapater as i only have the one network port on my mobo.
No firewall set in my modem, its a Netgear D7000v2. Are there specific ports i need to open or anything?
-
1 hour ago, Chad Kunsman said:
Is there a one single location or single guide that walks through how to get GPU (Nvidia) passthrough working on Catalina? I'm referring to all the little tiny things from start to finish you have to do or might have to check on, such as tiny xml edits and adjustments, weird tweaks, etc.
I've had no issues getting linux and win10 going with passthrough, including USB controllers, but even hours and hours of fiddling has gotten me nowhere with GPU passthrough and Catalina. And I know there are little bits and pieces of useful information in multiples places and threads but it's a big challenge trying to wrangle them all together. Stuff like "Oh try this..." or "Change this line in your xml".
Have a look at this:
-
2 hours ago, ghost82 said:
Ensure that the host (Unraid) is setup properly for network connectivity (test: ping from unraid).
Ensure you created a bridge in unraid and ensure that the vm is using the bridge (test: ping from the vm, you have the terminal available during installation).
Ensure you are using type vmxnet3 or try e1000-82545em for network connectivity.
I've attached some screenshots below. I definitely have internet access from Unraid and have been using it without fail for a few months now.
I'm pretty sure the VM has internet becuase its not showing the 'network connection required' error but rather that it can't connect to recovery server specifically. I can't ping my modem, but i can ping google IP, 8.8.8.8, DNS seems to be an issue as i can't ping google.com.
Not sure why mine is failing but everyone else seems to run so smoothly. I am running an Ryzen CPU if that makes any difference?
-
Been a month, is anyone able to help??
-
Can someone please help. I'm getting an IP but can't talk to my router or ping internet.
Server has internet, and is working great. I've tried reinstalling the VM about 10 times, each one following the SpaceinvaderOne MacOS installation guide.
Any help would be great.
-
Still having this issue. I can't install any MacOS VM as they all come back with that same error. I've tried changing all i can in the XML. My server definitely has internet access, i think it might have something to do with the VM network bridge that's unable to receive internet access...?
Anyone have any more ideas? @SpaceInvaderOne
-
12 minutes ago, ghost82 said:
Ensure that you have vmxnet3 as virtual network, and change to e1000 only after downloading from server.
This is my current XML file:
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='52:54:00:a4:47:7b'/>
<source bridge='br0'/>
<model type='vmxnet3'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/>
</interface>Even using the default settings from @SpaceInvaderOne VM innstall guide it seems to result the 'recovery server error'.
100% CPU usage issue
in General Support
Posted
Same here. I've been noticing the server run quite sluggish and i even installed more RAM into it.
I can see in the logs there are a few erros with a PCIe bus, can someone help with what the exact issue is?
zeus-diagnostics-20201016-0920.zip