January 18, 201214 yr It all depends on what hardware you require to support, and what functionality you want. I stick with beta11 because it was the last release which, for me, has a working nfs implementation, and it supports all my hardware. If later releases pose no nfs problems for you and/or you have a problematic realtek network interface, you may choose to run a later release.
January 18, 201214 yr I want to run it as a guest on Esxi using fairly standard hardware I chose for compatibility, supported Intel NICs for example. Some plugins I want require 5.0-b11 or later, but apart from that and 3TB hard drive support there are no other features I would require, at least until p+q parity comes along. I suppose a simpler way of asking would have been, If 5.0-b11 wasn't going to be stable for me, would it be apparent pretty quickly? or would it take months for a potential instability/fault to arise?
January 18, 201214 yr I cannot predict how long it would take instabilities to become apparent to you but, apart from a brief excursion into b12a, I have been running b11 since the week it was released - I have encountered no problems.
April 2, 201214 yr Hi, i attach my actual syslog. I have the following pluggins installed: snap0.47, powerdown1.02, screen4.03, utempter1.14, inotify-tools3.8 and bwm-ng0.6. I want to install my new 1 x IBM M1015 (LSI 9220-8i) flashed with IT firmware to support more disks. Can anyone confirm to me if 5.0b11 is stable and will work for my setup. Rgds. syslog-2012-04-01.txt
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.