ajgoyt Posted January 22, 2012 Share Posted January 22, 2012 Hey guys running 4.7 Pro for well over a year and have not done any transferring or addons of any kind for well over 2 months, I went to rebuild parity the other day and noticed the parity is super slow @ 46 kb/sec minutes are crazy like 69,5279 left. When i let it try to rebuild most of the day today it only got to 1.1% and disk1 had some errors. All disks show green even disk1 with the errors! But if i refresh the page they (all disks except parity) are all blinking like they are asleep! I have looked through the syslog and I saw some spindowns events, So i naturally changed the spindown to 9.0hours and it took.. But changing the spindown has no effect on speeding up the parity check. Any ideas on what's happening? I have attached the syslog fyi - I can view all my shares from my win 7 machine.... Thanks Aj syslog-2012-01-21.txt Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 22, 2012 Author Share Posted January 22, 2012 Ok tried to stop parity and it's super slow to react (per it had lots of errors on disk 1) and refreshing the webpage doesn't seem to help, finally tried another and now cannot get to the tower page. also cannot see the server through the network, Hardrive LED is still solid... appears to be a disk1 issue causing the slowness or maybe something to do with the spinup-down script!!!!!! see the capture after tried to stop the parity I sat for 20 minutes waiting for all disks to unmount so i can shut it down properly. still will not shutdown properly (finally got the server shutdown after waiting along time) question - can I disconnect disk1 and the try another parity check or? Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 23, 2012 Author Share Posted January 23, 2012 Anyone have any ideas? Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Post a SMART report for disk 1. Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 Sorry for the late reply was traveling - This is a short smart test on disk1 - Looks like a sector errors..... Kind of scared to start parity again. Just started a long smart test on drive 1, will be done in 4+ hours Please advise? === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 Serial Number: MN1220F31JXH2D Firmware Version: MN6OA5C0 User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall] ATA Version is: 8 ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is: Sat Jan 28 06:37:16 2012 PST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. See vendor-specific Attribute list for failed Attributes. General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x85) Offline data collection activity was aborted by an interrupting command from host. Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled. Self-test execution status: ( 249) Self-test routine in progress... 90% of test remaining. Total time to complete Offline data collection: (18096) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. No Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 1) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 255) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 041 041 016 Pre-fail Always - 47540 2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 135 135 054 Pre-fail Offline - 84 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 253 253 024 Pre-fail Always - 65 (Average 216) 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 332 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 005 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 2005 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail Always - 0 8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 135 135 020 Pre-fail Offline - 26 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 1288 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 156 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 336 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 336 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 253 253 000 Old_age Always - 23 (Lifetime Min/Max 16/43) 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always - 2352 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 SMART Error Log Version: 1 No Errors Logged SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 No self-tests have been logged. [To run self-tests, use: smartctl -t] SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS 1 0 0 Not_testing 2 0 0 Not_testing 3 0 0 Not_testing 4 0 0 Not_testing 5 0 0 Not_testing Selective self-test flags (0x0): After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. Link to comment
Joe L. Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Your disk has already failed. RMA it. === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 005 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 2005 Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 Joe - was disk1 why my parity check is acting so weird? Link to comment
Joe L. Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Joe - was disk1 why my parity check is acting so weird? Yes. I hope you were running a NOCORRECT check, otherwise you might have re-written parity with the zeros unRAID returned from the failing drive sectors. Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 Probably not on the nocorrect, The good if you call it was there really wasn't anything on that drive. Question - for now i would like to thrown in a smaller drive in disk1 - and then make a full parity check to back up all the other drives, Is this possible or do i have to use the same size disk or? Link to comment
Joe L. Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Probably not on the nocorrect, The good if you call it was there really wasn't anything on that drive. Question - for now i would like to thrown in a smaller drive in disk1 - and then make a full parity check to back up all the other drives, Is this possible or do i have to use the same size disk or? You can only use a smaller disk if you stop the array, set a new initial disk configuration, which immediately invalidates parity. Then, completely re-calculate parity on the new disk configuration. You'll be without parity protection until it completes the new parity calculation. Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 I can see all my shares and data on the other disks, Do you think i should wait till i get my disk back from RMA? Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Are you running with a missing disk? You could recalculate parity without the drive and then add it back after you get the replacement. Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted January 29, 2012 Author Share Posted January 29, 2012 Correct running with a missing disk1, is it on the Wiki on how to calculate with a missing disk? Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php?title=FAQ#On_version_4.5.4_of_unRAID_onward Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.