sgibbers17 Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 I am starting up a new system with 5 3TB drives and I am getting ready to preclear them should I use the flag " -A = force starting sector to be on sector 64 for 4k alignment." Quote Link to comment
garycase Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Not necessary with drives > 2TB Quote Link to comment
sgibbers17 Posted November 11, 2013 Author Share Posted November 11, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply version 1.14 is now available. Hopefully the improved wording on the output will make it more clear in the future when dealing with disks > 2.2TB. Quote Link to comment
Fireball3 Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 Thx Joe L. Here is the link to the preclear thread where the always up-to-date version can be found. Btw: Are you still supporting the unMENU? I noticed that the rsync in unMENU is outdated. Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 Are you still supporting the unMENU?Yes I noticed that the rsync in unMENU is outdated. Do you have a link to a newer compatible Slackware package? Joe L. Quote Link to comment
Fireball3 Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 Do you have a link to a newer compatible Slackware package? When installing out of unMENU there was a notification that the existing (stock) is 3.0.7 I don't know if there is an even more up-to-date version. Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 Do you have a link to a newer compatible Slackware package? When installing out of unMENU there was a notification that the existing (stock) is 3.0.7 I don't know if there is an even more up-to-date version. Then don't install it from unMENU's package manager. Remember, there are many users of unMENU with 4,X versions of unRAID that shipped with older versions of rsync. Quote Link to comment
Fireball3 Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 I shouldn't have but, well, I did. But more because I hoped it would start the daemon - it did not. Edit: Have been reading in on rsync. The latest version of rsync is 3.1.0 (28th, sept 2013). This is a feature release that improves performance, provides several new options, and fixes a few bugs along the way Quote Link to comment
adammerkley Posted November 17, 2013 Share Posted November 17, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply version 1.14 is now available. Hopefully the improved wording on the output will make it more clear in the future when dealing with disks > 2.2TB. I just finished preclearing 2 3TB drives using 1.13. I used -A. Is this going to be a problem? Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply version 1.14 is now available. Hopefully the improved wording on the output will make it more clear in the future when dealing with disks > 2.2TB. I just finished preclearing 2 3TB drives using 1.13. I used -A. Is this going to be a problem? no problem. The "-a" and '-A" are silently ignored on disks greater than 2.2TB. They always get a GPT partition aligned on a 4k boundary. Quote Link to comment
unTER Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply version 1.14 is now available. Hopefully the improved wording on the output will make it more clear in the future when dealing with disks > 2.2TB. I just finished preclearing 2 3TB drives using 1.13. I used -A. Is this going to be a problem? no problem. The "-a" and '-A" are silently ignored on disks greater than 2.2TB. They always get a GPT partition aligned on a 4k boundary. I take it that this won't be a problem as you've just stated, but I wanted to ask again in regards to my situation. I precleared three 3TB drives back in June 2013 but got too busy to complete my unRAID project. I'm back at it now and with one more 3TB drive. I'm going to use preclear v1.14 the new drive. Would there be any benefit of me preclearing the other drives again with this newest 1.14 version since I don't have any data on them yet? Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Thanks for the quick reply version 1.14 is now available. Hopefully the improved wording on the output will make it more clear in the future when dealing with disks > 2.2TB. I just finished preclearing 2 3TB drives using 1.13. I used -A. Is this going to be a problem? no problem. The "-a" and '-A" are silently ignored on disks greater than 2.2TB. They always get a GPT partition aligned on a 4k boundary. I take it that this won't be a problem as you've just stated, but I wanted to ask again in regards to my situation. I precleared three 3TB drives back in June 2013 but got too busy to complete my unRAID project. I'm back at it now and with one more 3TB drive. I'm going to use preclear v1.14 the new drive. Would there be any benefit of me preclearing the other drives again with this newest 1.14 version since I don't have any data on them yet? If they were already successfully pre-cleared (and not yet used or assigned to the array), there is no need to use the newer preclear again. The newer version prevents you from accidentally clearing the wrong drive (better check t see if it is already assigned) on the 5.X series releases and has better error messages and prompts when dealing with drives over 2.2TB. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.