Posted June 4, 201510 yr Now that Docker supports exposing and forwarding whole port ranges since v 1.6 any chance of updating DockerMan to support same?: What I was thinking was the ability to do this: to eliminate this: from what I have read here (open to correction) a docker container can alse be run with run -d --name="CONTAINERNAME" --net="bridge" -p 59960-59970:59960-59970/tcp -v "VOLUME":"VOLUME":rw Would love some opinions. Thanks, The Capt.
June 7, 201510 yr Author I have been experimenting with it just to ensure it works: I can run a deluge container for example from the command line with: /usr/bin/docker run -d --name="Deluge" --net="bridge" -e TZ="Europe/London" -p 48921-48930:48921-48930/tcp -p 58846:58846/tcp -p 8112:8112/tcp -v "/mnt/cache/Docker/AppData/Deluge":"/config":rw -v "/mnt/user/Downloads/Deluge":"/downloads":rw needo/deluge and the port range 58921-48930 are set up correctly and the container runs. The DockerMan WebUI however still lists all the ports individually like my 2nd screenshot in the OP. Is this even a possible improvement to DockerMan? Thanks again, The Capt.
June 8, 201510 yr Going to move this to the roadmap as it's not a defect report, but a feature request.
June 8, 201510 yr Author Thanks for moving this, the subheading of the Defect Reports subforum reads: "Post bug reports and feature enhancement suggestions here." That is why I thought it was the correct location for it. Thanks, The Capt.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.